Topic: The Objective Standards Guild - Testimonium Libertatem Iustitia (Read 5185 times)

The one pretending to represent something here is you ( and your shit ego ) , or else you would have just not opposed the OP from the start.

Nobody cares about how you believe you have beaten OG ? Explain elsewhere.

The objective reader is only interested in why you keep running away from the on topic question.

Why do you not support the introduction of transparent objective standards as a basis for the trust system?

Answer ? Or too afraid?

Sorry, but I've already beaten you on the forum OG.

Well ask suchmoon. She's the master at both.

Look I just challenged her to answer why she opposes the introduction of transparent objective standards as a basis for the trust system and........ running , hiding whatever she's vanished.

Go see if she is still running or hiding. You seem to be friends with these types of degenerate scammer protectors and supporters now.

Also you need to stalk me more. You've been slacking lately.
I dont want to go back to being ignored again. It's very hurtful.

Also on your Bpip why is not most words posted a metric?
I want CH to be more famous. Please don't forget to total all his friends words too. TOAA et al

I find it amusing that nobody can propose any robust argument that opposes the intro of transparent objective standards as a basis for the trust system.

And yet.....NO DT1 including theymos even supports it lol

Make you wonder why?

I guess running away and hiding are part of the same process that occurs when you know you're talking shit and about to be pulled apart in public ...all over again.

There is NO way to dispute the subjectivity that remains fosters the abuse, crushing free speech and dilutes warnings or even deliberately blocks legitimate warnings. Those that want to retain it have a clear agenda.

If you want to try then go ahead.

You don't.  You need a leader to move it past a discussion topic.


What is the difference between running away and hiding?

Suchmoron fails to understand the concept.

There is no leader? Why do you need a leader to introduce transparent objective standards?

I mean what point would there be to a leader?

Nothing wrong with corrupt authority that wants to oppose transparent objective standards so it can continue to create a 2 tier system the subjective corrupt system there is now. Is that what you meant to say?

Take away the subjective nature and it forces everyone to abide by a set of transparent objective standards.

Why are you opposing it suchmoon ?
You should be supporting it  

Let me hear the basis for your objection? So I can crush your flimsy crap publicly again.

You wanna stay on chipmixer and continue to prevent legitmate scammer warnings on your pals or alts right?
Whilst punishing others for far less?

Dont run away.

LOL no I’m not taking over anything..

So... you wanna take over the guild because authority is bad? 

May I suggest for your first executive order as the new guild president to consider firing the ^^^ plagiarising sockpuppeting shit bumper ^^^ who's been pretending to represent the guild in TECSHARE's absense.

Anyone in oppose of this threads has an opposite view against the real motives behind Bitcoin of forming an decentralized community in the world.

Don't let some of the great words by the TECSHARE forgotten. Implementation of objective standards is what would make this forum a better place for real development in decentralized technology.

I agree, for me the lists being mentioned or formed at the start was an error

It should have just been a thread to see who ( regardless of past actions) going forward would agree to use transparent objective standards as a basis for their red tags.

I mean anyone NOT supporting transparent objective standards would have a real problem fielding an argument that would stand up to scrutiny.

I mean theymos knows that merits aka collusion credits are likely negatively correlated to trust or certainly nothing to do with trust in financial terms.  He also was told and probably knew sticking both control systems together like that both super wide open to corruption with such obvious rewards for abusing them was bat shit crazy.

Still, he did it and then started adding additional incentives to abuse.

I mean this guild or agreement would not even be necessary if he removed the dumb as fuck red tags and went with flags2 and 3.
Flag 1 needs to been tightened up or you'll still get that for liking lemons.

There is no credible or solid argument against any of the points TS et al made actually.
Hence why theymos and everyone else didnt bother to field any lol.

It boils down to DT wanting to retain the power to punish anyone for saying anything they dont like and ensuring they maintain the ability to ensure only they fit the chipmixer criteria and other unfair advantages.

The other blame must be put at the feet of darkstar and the other corrupt campaign managers that know these trust abusing free speech crushing scammer protecting scum are gaming the system but still sponsor their actions.

Hence why that coward and other shit bird campaign managers run a mile when you mention transparent objective standards

Corruption and collusion would be destroyed once you employ transparent objective standards.

I didn’t participate in this thread, even though being named, because I don’t completely agree with it and didn’t want to get lumped into some category..

Many things I do agree with here are their are cliques of power hunger and many hellbent on searching tirelessly in effort to find opportunities to wield said power, taking control of the forums idealistic direction greatly inflated by the insanity of merits “for good posts” being tied to voting power for ideological leadership..

A slight revamp of my trust list is in order eventually when I get some time, and some of us are going to have to step up in attempt to fill the great void left by our late friend TS’s absence..


With all the insanity going on in the world these days from the China virus lockdowns including blatant intrusions on personal liberty and governments and media showing their asses as to how absolutely corrupt they are, I am only more and more affirmed that authority, in and of itself, is evil.. Democracy or not..


The Times 03/Jan/2009 Chancellor on brink of second bailout for banks.

Let’s not forget the mission..

Bitcoin isn’t a get rich quick scheme, it’s a remove power and authority scheme..
Remove the chancel aswell as the banks..

Why do you object to the introduction of objective standards as a basis for the trust system?
Something to fear?

Also what makes you believe there is any leader?
Why would a set of objective standards require a leader?

Why would the idea of  introducing some objective standards into the trust system suddenly not be worthwhile because one person is offline for 2 months.

You are totally wrong, you don't even understand my real motives.

Nothing is gone, objective standards should remain here forever.

Your love for you master is impressive, but resistence is futile.

Your pathetic gang is long gone:


And your master is offline for 2 months now.

Your efforts for resurrecting this gang are in vain!

* BUMP * ( with love )

Vod is already the resident sad children's party magician in the clown car. I am afraid if we take that away from him he might eat a bullet.

Since malboroza is a scammer supporter then I don't think that would be sensible.
Since you don't support the objective standards guild then your nomination is clearly more moronic scammer supporting spew.
Stfu imbecile.

Besides I heard  that Marlboroza is already the secretary of the double standards scammers guild.
Sportsbet.io are sponsoring some very suboptimal members here.

Just don't start drawing dicks across boards, Mini Me.
Thanks but no thanks, you are doing just fine as secretary of objective standardz guild but if techy needs magician, I will gladly jump out of clown car and apply to position. I've heard he likes to watch them pulling hares out of a hat.

Yeah, I noticed he has a habit of doing that.

I would like to nominate marlboroza as bitcointalks Secretary of Objective Standards.

Do I have a second?