I'm not sure that higher odds (i.e. lower multipliers, or payouts) stand for a more aggressive approach, while lower odds for a more conservative one. As it seems to me, we can't actually draw such a distinction here (aggressive or conservative) when we refer to odds on their own. Personally, I would consider a more aggressive strategy the one which involves a higher percentage of your balance that you stake at each roll. Conversely, if you go small, that should be considered a more conservative strategy
Sorry for misunderstanding, higher odds = higher multipliers and payouts, along with higher bets you have really aggressive play
In dice higher odds, i.e. higher win chances, stand for lower multipliers, i.e. the amount received on a win (payout)
But enough nitpicking as this is not my point altogether. The heart of the matter, or point at stake if you please, is that no matter how high or low your payout, multiplier, or odds might be, over the course of your gambling life it all eventually comes down to the house edge (and whether you can live with it)
So we can't really say that we are betting more aggressively with higher multipliers than with lower ones, at least not if we make thousands and thousands of rolls. By extension, that basically means that it is the percentage of our balance at stake which is what defines the aggressiveness, or lack thereof, of the utilized strategy (aka risk exposure)
Fortunately I've chosen to play in 
