Topic: The PCR test is creating Covid cases rather than finding them... (Read 292 times)

^^^ Kinda interesting detail you have there Tash. But make it even simpler...

In the wee grades of elementary school, we all learn spelling. Making words out of the alphabet, and making sentences out of those words, is called spelling. If you spell a word wrong in those wee grade levels, you are casting the spell wrong. If a person you cast the spell "to" doesn't recognize intuitively your incorrect spelling, the spell might give him a totally incorrect understanding. And an incorrect understanding might produce an incorrect result.

Be sure that you spell your words correctly so that everybody involved knows exactly what kind of a spell you are casting. And to think that they executed the witches at Salem for casting spells. We are ALL Harry Potters a little... if we can spell.

So, modern schooling teaches witchcraft to all the kids... especially if the school doesn't teach God and the Bible along with the spelling.

Covid-19 Tests Are Cancerous - This Is No Joke
https://rense.com/general96/covid-19-test.php

It's easily possible that the PCR is creating the Covid disease, kinda the way that tvbcof says in an above post. But what I meant was a little different. I meant that the PCR was creating cases, whether or not they have even one virus in them.

Since you can multiply anything with the PCR test, if your choice is a strand of Covid RNA, you will multiply that strand in the PCR, for any person who has/had that strand of RNA in his body at the time of testing. In other words, if the PCR happened to grab the last strand of that particular RNA in swab of the person's body, the multiplication of it in the test, will show that he is a case, even if he doesn't have even one more piece of that strand in his whole body.

Possible, that the PCR test is creating Covid cases instead of just simply finding it. its sad reality we really can't tell how it happened exactly but I also heard it somewhere that they speculating that it is one way how covid spread i don't know but maybe.. maybe... because there are healthy people who has no sickness at all and when they do PCR test the result was Positive how does it happend?.. it's not really reliable as some study it, so we better be careful.

Didn't you see all the nano sized "pokeys" sticking out the sides of the micro sized thread? Of course not. Nano is too small to be seen at that limited magnification.

Please stop trying to use common sense, okay?

watch the video and see the size of the tweezers.
https://i2.wp.com/www.thelastamericanvagabond.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/04/Screen-Shot-2021-04-05-at-1.44.58-PM.png

this is not "nano" size fabric strand.. its micro size
common sense shows this by looking at the reference width of tweezers and then looking at the fabric thickness

also look he has it dipped in water.
yes you can make fabric move in water to avoid showing hands moving it

seems a guy just rubbed his mask/swab against some black fabric and is recording .. pretty much pocket lint
he put on his swab/mask

try to use common sense

https://www.thelastamericanvagabond.com/new-reports-black-string-like-objects-masks-swabs-danger-or-conspiracy-theory/

maybe you dont reaiise this but nano tech can mean many things.. but those many things are limited
and robots/radio signals and stuff isnt it

so you pulling up a video talking about nanotech 5G robots changing human dna.. is you showing you cant use common sense and cant do research on facts

maybe try quoting science and not 'amateurs'

then once you know what is factually possible vs impossible.. you will then 'know if these things are hoaxes'

Nanotechnology is nothing new and is not some sort of a 'conspiracy theory'.  Pick up any scientism rag  such as New Scientist and you'll find tons of stories about this sort of thing.  Moncef Slaoui has been heavy into this kind of technology for decades and a vocal advocate for it.  Suddenly he was plunked in to head up 'operation warpspeed'.  To look and see if there is anything interesting to be seen with the swabs is a common sense thing to do, and especially since nobody who has a career in any scientific field will touch it since it would be career suicide.  Masks similar.

https://www.technocracy.news/operation-warp-speed-head-and-gates-foundation-are-pushing-bioelectronics-and-vaccine-patches/

so because its not a cotton Q0tip an idiot thinks the swab is a nanotech 5G antenna..
..
ok tvbcof has officially jumped off the cliff of reality and fell into the sea of insanity

common sense and intelligence can see that its hoax/conspiracy/fantasy. but thank you tvbcof for admitting that you have no common sense or intelligence when you say you "have no to know if these things are hoaxes"

Here is a kind of an interesting amateur analysis of one of the test swabs that 'they' rub around in the area close to the brain:

  https://www.bitchute.com/video/t1LFQ6frXVEG/

Another similar exploration on a mask also showed a very similar black thing with very similar reactions to the environment.

I have no way to know if these things are hoaxes, but also no real reason to believe that the various analyses are related to one another.  Even if they are not, copy-cat hoaxes actually are a thing.  Anyway, these are interesting observations to match against other observations.

i already said they 'search for' E S and N protein sequences

the human sequence if found would nullify the test.
finding human sequence would never result in a covid positive test.

what you dont realise is:
DNA has 4 'chemicals'
adenine, cytosine, guanine, thymine

RNA has 4 'chemicals'
adenine, cytosine, guanine, uracil

the thing is.. to amplify human DNA they need to first split dna into single stranded dna (ssdna)
this is a process in of itself thats different to DSrna splitting
 and then add the 4 chemicals of dna to then  to bind to the sing strands to then create 2 pairs of dna

if they put in the RNA chemicals into DNA mix. the ssDNA wont do anything as there is no thymine in it to create a complete DNA.. thus amplification does not happen

..
same goes for RNA. to amplify RNA they need to put RNA chemicals into the mix which creates double stranded RNA(dsRNA)
which they then split into 2 RNA of opposites. this is a process in of itself thats different to DNA splitting
and then add more RNA chemicals to create 2 pairs of dsrna.

putting DNA chemicals into an RNA sample wont amplify RNA as its missing the uracil

..
please do try to learn how things are done and the processes involved. heck even try to learn the common sense differences between RNA and DNA


maybe ill make it simple.. adding RNA reagents to a DNA sample
                                       G T A C G T A C  add chemical  G T A C G T A C
G T A C G T A C              /                                               |  |    |  |  |    |
|  |  | |  |  | |  |                                              C A    G C A    G    
C A T G C A T G              \                                                  
                                       C A T G C A T G   add chemical  C A T G C A T G
                                                                                      |     |  |  |    |  |
                                                                                      G    A C G   A  C

as you can see the amplification fails as it did not create 2 strands of dna. as pieces are missing

maybe ill make it simple.. adding DNA reagents to a RNA sample
                                                                          G U A C G U A C  add chemical  G T A C G T A C
                                            G U A C G U A C          /                                          |  |    |  |  |    |
G U A C G U A C add chemical |  |  | |  |  | |  |                                          C A    G C A    G    
                                            C A    G C A    G          \                                                  
                                                                                 fail
..
so as you can see. trying to amplify human DNA wont amplify viral RNA..
                            trying to amplify viral RNA wont amplify human DNA
using DNA amplification on RNA causes more issues.

..
there are other processes in place that separate RNA from DNA before amplification. as a double check .. things like chloroform and RNase agents. which bind and clump to DNA but dont bind to RNA. using things like rnase laced magnetic particles they can extract the DNA clump without removing the RNA stuff

..
then they look at the RNA left over and amplify it using the RNA agents. and then look for the E S  N proteins identified as sars-cov-2

..i think this is as basic lay-man as i can make it. if you still dont understand or unwilling to learn. then stop wasting another year in ignorance and find another subject to talk about

Says the ignorant franky1, who can't seem to back up much of anything he says, while BADecker backs up almost everything... like the OP, for example.

says the ignorant badecker.
he would rather explain his thoughts as random causes than find out the actual cause.

yep when badecker cant understand anything. he always blames it on governments or god

Actually, random is completely it.

For some strange reason people think that "random" means "accidental" or "spontaneity." Nothing has ever been proven to have come about through spontaneity. Everything comes about for a reason, by cause and effect. What this means is that "random" has another meaning. What is that meaning? "Random" simply means that people are too ignorant and incapable to find out what the causes and effects really are. "Random" means that people are ignorant.

Now you are not as ignorant as you were before you read this. And thanks for prompting me to explain my above post that you quoted.

So random isn't it, our luck is on our side, how lucky we are as a family. I think we're blessed.

chunks or complete chromosome 8..
sections or full sequence..
either way. positive for it=covid negative by default(test is void/classed as fail)

again.. positive for small sequence of chromosome8 = test result never being covid positive

covid positive is not the measure of the 'chunk' of chromosome8.. its the measure of E S N proteins of the virus.
E S and N protein sequences are not chromosome8(or chunks of chromosome8)

chromosome8 chunk sequence as you refer to it. is a separate thing. used as a counter-test to void a test if it shows as positive for the chromosome8 chunk

.. i would explain more but you cant even grasp the basics.

showing positive for a section of chromosome8 means something went wrong.

lets word it another way..
a straight man making love wants to make sure he is making love with a woman. if he finds a scrotum sack(Chromosone8) then he stops and leaves and doesnt complete the sexual act. he classes it as a failed test and does not say its positive 'for woman'
if he doesnt find a scrotum sack. he then continues to look and checks for breasts(e) clitorus(s) and a vagina(n)..
and then he amplifies his exploration
if it takes him 35 attempts to recognised breasts/clit/vagina. then he give up
if he can recognise breasts clit and vagina without many attempts then he is positive that its a woman

a amplification to test for covid will never occur if sections of chromosome8 are there. thus it will not find covid.

get it yet?

We're not talking about Chromosme 8 as a complete Chromosome necessarily. What we are talking about is the fact that one of the sequences in the PCR test, is exactly the same as a sequence within Chromosome 8.

What does a swab have?
1. Possibly some complete Chromosomes 8;
2. Possibly some parts or chunks of Chromosome 8;
3. A bunch of other stuff.

When they get a positive comparison, what is that comparison of? At least some of the time, the segment of Chromosome 8 that matches the segment the PCR uses to test. You get a false positive.

However, if you don't like the video, that's okay. Dr. Andrew Kaufman knows what he is talking about. More than you? Nobody knows this for a fact. But he sure writes and explains better.

no its not..
the PCR test looks for different things.
maybe you should try to learn first and post seconds

the E S N proteins are not chromosome 8
chromosome 8 is used as the opposite of a covid positive test
if chromosome 8 shows up the test will never be covid positive

Of course, that's why. I'm not going to contradict you on this one.