@The Pharmacist - page 2. | Bitcointalksearch.org

nutildah

legendary

Activity: 3010

Merit: 8114

Quote from: bill gator on May 27, 2019, 07:47:51 AM

I don't care to bring Nutildah down;

Well that's a bunch of bullshit as you proved in the next breath.

Quote from: bill gator on May 27, 2019, 07:47:51 AM

they sincerely believe that their inability to sell their legendary account with positive feedback makes the act acceptable. I think, that's a weak leg to stand on.

1. Just FYI, it was a Hero account back then. It also had more negative feedback than positive back then, still does.

2. I never said I thought it was acceptable. I said it was a mistake, and I admitted it. Unlike you, I also never tried to hide the fact that it happened.

3. Its also not as bad as engaging in a career as an account seller, or actually having traded accounts in the past. Even attempted murder carries a lesser sentence than murder.

4. If you want to tag me for it on your own then feel free, but then you can no longer claim you have the moral high ground.

bill gator

legendary

Activity: 1372

Merit: 1123

Quote from: Lauda on May 27, 2019, 08:09:51 AM

You can cry and scream all you want, but your time here is done and no tag will be served.

You can abuse the trust-system all you want, but my time here is just getting started.

Side-Note: Refreshing the page to see the little touches you put on your posts is so cute Tongue

Also, we're getting off-topic. This is about The Pharmacist, Nutildah and the consistency of TP's actions. I'll step out of this, because I only really wanted to voice that TP has been upholding their stated principles.
Unlike most of the laughable muppets; Ms. Piggy, Oscar the Grouch, Big-Bird - The whole crew.

Lauda

legendary

Activity: 2674

Merit: 2965

Terminated.

Quote from: bill gator on May 27, 2019, 08:05:29 AM

You can cry and scream all you want, but your time here is done and no tag will be served.

Quote from: The-One-Above-All on May 27, 2019, 08:09:04 AM

You are boring me, dance monkey.

The-One-Above-All

member

Activity: 252

Merit: 56

Quote from: Lauda on May 27, 2019, 08:00:52 AM

Quote from: bill gator on May 27, 2019, 07:47:51 AM

We're asking you for revenge Kitty-Queen.

FTFY. I am as consistent as this place can get, and revenge is not something that I shall be participating in.

Quote from: The-One-Above-All on May 27, 2019, 07:57:14 AM

Quote from: Lauda on May 27, 2019, 06:00:08 AM

Nutildah won't be tagged solely because slimy hypocrites asked for him to get tagged after he started speaking out against them.

thanks I am quoting that for future use.

Feel free to quote it, I've already stated it before CH. If you ask for it out of spite/revenge, then it isn't happening.

LOL this excuse is not one a DT should be giving. I mean obviously an observable liar and scammer like you should not be on DT anyway. However if someone is observed to be scamming or facilitating scammers and someone points it out they must be tagged for the sake of the board. NOt to spite one person who pointed out clearly you are a liar and scammer yourself. What a fucking retard you are lauda. You are meant to be on DT for the sake of the board not to use it for your own personal gain you scum bag.

Also just to add some further insight to this case in the initial post.

Nutildahs case of account selling is the WORST here

He deliberately wants to facilitate scamming by selling it

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.50719875

In his mind anyone selling their account is knowingly EVIL and wanting to help scammers . Read the above link. He fully intends on being evil and helping scammers for his 0.3btc

This is totally different intent and relationship to scamming than someone buying or selling accounts that are not even imagining scamming.

INTENT is everything with scamming and scammers.

bill gator

legendary

Activity: 1372

Merit: 1123

Quote from: Lauda on May 27, 2019, 08:00:52 AM

I am as consistently inconsistent as this place can get, and revenge is something that I shall be participating in.

FTFY

Implying that I'm asking for revenge, when Nutildah has done nothing to me, and I'm not asking you to do anything to them is painfully idiotic.
I don't know why you've chosen this route to defend your actions, but it's just making you look more silly than you already do.

Can we go back to nicknames? Pajeet Gator and Kitty-Queef 2020. Wink

Lauda

legendary

Activity: 2674

Merit: 2965

Terminated.

Quote from: bill gator on May 27, 2019, 07:47:51 AM

We're asking you for revenge Kitty-Queen.

FTFY. I am as consistent as this place can get, and revenge is not something that I shall be participating in.

Quote from: The-One-Above-All on May 27, 2019, 07:57:14 AM

Quote from: Lauda on May 27, 2019, 06:00:08 AM

Nutildah won't be tagged solely because slimy hypocrites asked for him to get tagged after he started speaking out against them.

thanks I am quoting that for future use.

Feel free to quote it, I've already stated it before CH. If you ask for it out of spite/revenge, then it isn't happening.

The-One-Above-All

member

Activity: 252

Merit: 56

Quote from: Lauda on May 27, 2019, 06:00:08 AM

Nutildah won't be tagged solely because slimy hypocrites asked for him to get tagged after he started speaking out against them.

thanks I am quoting that for future use.

demonstrates clear double standards ... speaking out against them? you mean it nutildah is a supporter of scammers and liars like you. Just like the pharmacist is. If I look up the extortion thread, the shady escrow or many other threads where you are observably being scrutinized for your shady behavior I notice the pharmacist is there protecting you.

It has been speculated lauda purchased the nutildah account then announced it was for sale. We think someone else bought it off nutildah because nutildah was a dark holder and nem original stakeholder (millions of dollars) and then this account was recently begging for 0.02btc loans. Either it was sold or the original owner is the biggest loser on this board.

I notice also that the pharmacist even said he is not smart enough to know if you are actually guilty of wrong doing with the escrow but will stick up for you anyway because he is loyal. This again sticking up for people who could be scammers out of loyalty is shady and not the behavior of a DT.

Same for this nutildah account. They will not red tag their own gang. BUt will make up any excuses they like to avoid doing so.

The entire bunch are corrupt and untrustworthy.

bill gator

legendary

Activity: 1372

Merit: 1123

Quote from: Lauda on May 27, 2019, 06:00:08 AM

Nutildah won't be tagged solely because slimy hypocrites asked for him to get tagged after he started speaking out against them.

Sometimes I think you post just for my personal amusement. I know, I know, that's a bit grandiose - your posts have been getting funnier lately, though.
How about they get tagged solely for the reason you've listed in my feedback? EDIT: NOT AN ACTUAL REQUEST! Do I really need to label everything so it's not willfully misinterpreted?

Code:

Account sales encourage scams, spam, and account farming.

We're asking you for consistency, not revenge, Kitty-Queen. What if I say please? Please.

Quote from: Quickseller on May 27, 2019, 12:36:32 AM

AFAIK, he is one person who has been consistent in this regard.

I haven't been able to find any others. Even some of the members that have left me negative trust and excluded me are including and have left positive trust for people like Nutildah.
I don't care to bring Nutildah down; they sincerely believe that their inability to sell their legendary account with positive feedback makes the act acceptable. I think, that's a weak leg to stand on.

Quote from: The Sceptical Chymist on May 27, 2019, 12:55:30 AM

I'm not going to tag anybody in 2019 for an account sale in 2016.

It's so refreshing to be able to take someone at their word.

Theymos has said that negative trust should be reserved for those that you believe are scammers, and my negative feedback is unwarranted for exactly this reason.
You all know that I am not a scammer, and you are taking advantage of a situation to tag me specifically where you have given others a pass for worse offenses.

Quote from: unibitcoinist on May 26, 2019, 11:36:39 PM

I don't think you too have the so called "double standard" here.

We're waiting for proof of their "double standard". Where have they contradicted themselves on this?

Lauda

legendary

Activity: 2674

Merit: 2965

Terminated.

Nutildah won't be tagged solely because slimy hypocrites asked for him to get tagged after he started speaking out against them.

Bitcoin_Arena

copper member

Activity: 2030

Merit: 1788

฿itcoin for all, All for ฿itcoin.

Or maybe you should go tag him yourself @unibitcoinist, I don't think The Pharmacist signed a contract anywhere that he is supposed to do whatever agenda comes across your mind whenever you want it to be done.

The Sceptical Chymist

legendary

Activity: 3332

Merit: 6809

Cashback 15%

Your account was registered in February of this year and somehow you've gotten so concerned with forum politics that you're asking why a single account didn't get tagged way back in 2016? Yeah, I'm sure you're not an alt account of one of the troll posse members.

To answer the question: I have no fucking clue why I didn't tag him back then. Maybe I didn't notice it. Maybe I removed the tag, which I tend to do for members who've shown themselves to be trustworthy over time. Don't remember, and at this point I don't care. I'm not going to tag anybody in 2019 for an account sale in 2016.

That's the only response you're going to get from me, so if that satisfies your question (or not), you can now lock the thread.

Quickseller

copper member

Activity: 2870

Merit: 2298

Quote from: unibitcoinist on May 26, 2019, 11:36:39 PM

Nutildah attempted to sell his account in late 2016.
Why didn't you tag him?
Can you share the reason behind this?
I don't think you too have the so called "double standard" here.

TP has previously said he won’t go back years after the fact to tag accounts for this and to my knowledge he hasn’t. AFAIK, he is one person who has been consistent in this regard.

unibitcoinist

member

Activity: 121

Merit: 40

Nutildah attempted to sell his account in late 2016.
Why didn't you tag him?
Can you share the reason behind this?
I don't think you too have the so called "double standard" here.

Topic: @The Pharmacist - page 2. (Read 715 times)