Topic: "The Pharmacist" need some madical assistance (Read 2659 times)

are you saying: "many people are engaged in illegal work in this world but why only i am punished?" btw, you should just move on because he is not in DT so his trust rating will not affect your account. but if you really want to get it removed or atleast changed to neutral then you should improve your behaviour and ask the pharmacist to reconsider his rating in a month or two. just my 2 cents!

then you need to open your eyes and read again, every people showing interest in buying account will received reg trust.thats  the motherfucker said to me and all, and those 2 people are interested to buy accounts thats why they asking for more information.

You were selling an account, that's why you got the red trust from The Pharmacist. In the thread that you have brought up, grim007 and Omegasun didn't even place a bid. It's cool because you did some actual effort to find someone that posted in the Auction section who didn't get any red trust from The Pharmacist. Just consider The Pharmacist's red trust as a "trendy thing" in this forum and move on. A lot of users has it.

Still not a reason to throw insults at others, neither in your first post up there nor your post right now.
Have some manners and talk to others in a civilised way, for pete's sake.

yeah i got it,call me mad,crazy whatever you want. but i don't care, he thoughts i'll begging him to remove my trust,huh. he is the worst creature in this world and a jobless cock

Geez, watch your language, would you?

why this mother fucker now ignore this man from red trust?username: grim007
Omegasun  https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/on-auction-full-member-1550020
you son of a bitch has no rights to misuse your Sr. activity power by giving unnecessary red trust,it could be a natural rating if needed bcoz no one is a scammer until anyone submit a valid proof.got it you bitch motherfucker The Pharmacist?

There you go. The fact is, he doesn't trust you. Sure he may need 'madical' assistance but what can we do about that? Just get over it. I happen to find his posts brutal honest and to be completely truthful I almost always laugh out loud at his remarks. If you don't agree with him then hit ignore, leave him some of your own retaliation negative trust and move on.

You should first check the trust page of that guy before writing some passive aggressive post that makes you sound like a total joke

Does it matter who I am? so why why are you afraid give him your red trust? so you just abuser?

And who are you, exactly?   This was your very first post from what's obviously an alt account.  I don't answer to you, fuckstain.

so you not trust whoever sell btctalk account right? then why you not leave this user negative trust too? https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/zybik-515387

his thread https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/wts-hero-member-account-with-neutral-trust-500-post-15-btc-1516192

show us if you didn't abuse trust system

I don't know why a druggists wants to judge others...lol


but anyways he looked like a jobless Crook , so i ignored his feedback. I suggest u do the same OP. Some of them here are as small as 14. I feel sympathy for them before i even think to retaliate with a negative feedback.

Eh, the question above is asking what I'd like to buy from Canada, and yes I have an interest in those OTC muscle relaxers but I can do without and my post was only half serious.  Leave it to QS to report that post, who should be the last person on this forum talking about trust, honesty, or anything related to those things.

Edit:  Good to see you around, Vod.

What are you crying about?  You left him twice the negative feedback he left you.

Stop being a hypocrite.   

But in short what you did was dishonest and you misled the person you were dealing with in to believing a 3rd party was acting as Escrow.  

Dishonest behavior = a justified negative feedback.

I would disagree on this point. From my experience, the majority of sold accounts are used in a way that does not result in anyone getting scammed. Additionally, I believe that there are a small number of serial scammers who buy accounts to scam, and that if they were unable to buy accounts that they would be able to scam with either their own farmed accounts or their own newbie(new) accounts.

There are also a number of purchased accounts that have built up fairly decent amounts of trust due to trading honestly over fairly long(ish) periods of time.

If no money was attempted to be stolen (nor that someone attempted to facilitate the theft of money), and you cannot reasonably say that certain actions would later lead to an attempt in the future (successful or not) attempt to steal money then you cannot reasonably say that someone is a scammer.

If you were to extend beyond the above criteria of when to leave negative trust, then you will quickly reach the point of leaving negative trust because you do not like their opinion and/or you do not like them personally and/or you do not like their business practices (of which do not result in the loss of any money).

For example, if a reputable person were to extend beyond the above criteria, could say that since you are selling this Art on eBay, which also owns PayPal, which is used by many scammers, you are helping a platform that is used by many scammers, and are therefore helping scammers, and deserve negative trust.

Another example would be that someone claims to be "from" a certain zip code, but actually lives far away from that zip code, however they work within a few miles from that zip code, and the closest post office to their work is in the zip code they claim to be "from", and that a reputable person were to leave negative trust because they are "lying".

A neutral rating is much more complex because it is only used for "comments" and does not affect the trust score of the person leaving it.

Congrats The Pharmacist, you got a fanclub creating off topic threads (OP - where's the scam accusation here?) and you got QS busting your ass.

I'm starting to think you might be doing something right here

Not suprising that you defend alt accounts and the selling of accounts Quickseller considering your recent history, especially around fake Escrow arrangments.

It doesn't take a genius to recognise the fact that sold accounts are often used to scam others therefore the seller is just as guilty as the buyer.



So by your definition I presume you feel that all those people that left you neutral/negative feedback are wrong as you did not plan to steal from others?

It looks like he is trying to get some "madical assistance", via soliciting the shipping of illegal drugs to him in the US. (the post in question has been reported and may be deleted).

False. The feedback that he leaves does not point any anyone actually stealing from others, nor attempting to (and/or planning on) stealing from others, which is what negative trust is designed for.