Pages:
Author

Topic: The quality of this forum has gone down significantly (Read 685 times)

legendary
Activity: 2590
Merit: 3008
Welt Am Draht
Yeah Satoshi Nakamoto would be surely proud.

Your one line is not exactly enriching the discourse here either.

People have stated that the merit system has drained the blatant piss takers of their ammo and I agree with them. Also cryptotalk has lured many of the most dire posters too. It's still not great but it is better than it was.
member
Activity: 224
Merit: 36
ch4534ch3ckn3v3rch453481tch
Actually, the forum is improving in my opinion.

Yeah Satoshi Nakamoto would be surely proud.
hero member
Activity: 2016
Merit: 531
FREE passive income eBook @ tinyurl.com/PIA10
Don't go so harsh on OP; he's gone into hiding since 18th March and will only emerge after the pandemic. Cheesy
hero member
Activity: 1540
Merit: 759
Whats your suggestion to improve the quality of the space?

May I answer instead of him?

I suppose these low quality posts are made by people who wear signatures, that pays for each post. And participants prefer quantity over quality.  These campaign need bounty managers like yahoo or CryptopreneurBrainboss. They not only just count number of posts per week, but also give warnings if the quality is low, drop from campaign or put on a blacklist from participating in their campaigns.

Or, better yet, start paying bonuses, or just in general, for merited posts.

You'd see the quality of posts go drastically higher if merit had to be won in order for these campaigns to pay.
hero member
Activity: 2072
Merit: 603
Just wanted to share this. Came back from a break, now it's full of rubbish threads by "legendaries" whored accounts that discuss rubbish, looks like one of the fake forum on forumwarz. WTF.
Your post history indicates your break was after July 30, 2018. I don't know what you mean exactly because your OP isn't going into any detail, maybe you've visited Altcoin Discussion?

During your break many good posts were created, you only need to know where to search them. Of course you'll find some crap everywhere but it's easy to skip it, my impression is rather before you had your break, the forum was spammy.
Here are some interesting posts: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/is-it-needed-a-history-education-board-5232037

And there is much more, the list contains only a tiny part.

I feel like he just came to forum back again and started reading the stuff all over. May be he ended up on the another planet after reading rubbish which is actually logical talk over the time and as per the on going activities around us.

Oops! May be he forgot to catch up millions of things.

Go deeper in the forum and read! You cant just judge with single reading

Its better you comment what improvement you want rather than suggesting the forum quality is dropping.

Start the change from yourself man, then we will follow if you think its scrap everywhere and will improve.

sr. member
Activity: 658
Merit: 256
Freshdice.com
You joined Bitcointalk in late 2017, and you think the current state is worse? Bruh. If you think threads right now are rubbish, what more in late 2017? I'd say Bitcointalk's current state is great compared to the past as a lot of people stopped due to the merit system and a lot of people capitulated due to bitcoin's drop in price.
Merit system is a proof that the quality of this forum have improved, how? I am not sure but as I have observed, topics are multiplying faster than before because users are wanting merit from other users in this forum, everytime a "subject matter" is having potential to be discussed in this forum, topics would immediately rain down, and IN MY OPINION, this makes this forum, more interactive. Also, when it comes to the moderators, they are more active on deleting and moving irrelevant topics, then properly segregating them to their 'proper' places in this forum.
legendary
Activity: 2212
Merit: 7064
Cashback 15%
I wonder one thing... has OP visited any other crypto forum in his life?
If you think this one is bad, you probably compared it to some other that is better.
I would like to found out more about that secret cryptoEldorado forum heaven   Tongue
legendary
Activity: 2464
Merit: 2094
I joined in aug 2017, and tbh quality wise this forum is at far better place than before.
Thus you also have to admit that the meir system that has been implemented for the past 2 years has changed the forum for the better and to be honest that I feel the same way. Theymos has worked wonderfully to make this forum a good and quality place to discuss about bitcoin and other matters related to this, the merit system is a great effort to reduce shitposting made by forum users.



I think most forum users already know what the report to moderator button function and the OP need not bother to state that "now it's full of rubbish threads by "legendaries" whored accounts that discuss rubbish" because you can use the button to report one or two posts that you consider trash made by Legendary members. I know that there may be Legendary members who behave as you have mentioned, but I will oppose you if you say that all currently active Legendary members behave the same.

Not everything is the same and you have to call it as a certain person because not all of them and in my opinion this is a discriminatory statement against Legendary members who have contributed a lot in the forum.
legendary
Activity: 3234
Merit: 5637
Blackjack.fun-Free Raffle-Join&Win $50🎲
This is the problem when most are here to make up their chipmixer max quota.

Do you really think that the participants of the CM Signature Campaign are the biggest problem in this forum, especially in terms of the quality of their posts? Of the total 56 members who have CM signature, in last 3 weeks there is only 10 of them or less who post 50 or more post which entered the quota of paid posts.

I am not objective as a participant to talk about the quality of posts in CM signature campaign, but I think most members on this forum will agree that we are not shitposters who are only hunt our max weekly post quota. After all, all information is publicly available in our spreadsheet.
copper member
Activity: 2184
Merit: 4238
Join the world-leading crypto sportsbook NOW!
I expected OP to have been registered in 2010 or something. Instead it's 2017.

The fact that the OP laid this turd of post in meta, then skedaddled makes it look more like someone's troll account that anything else.  Maybe the OP has been around since 2010?  If so, why not post from your real account if you're concerned about the quality of posts on the forum?

If increasing the quality of the forum is the objective, explain what's so bad about it, make some practical suggestions, contribute in a way that will inspire people to follow your lead.
member
Activity: 112
Merit: 44
When you have to make 60 posts a week to make $20, people tend to shitpost all over the place.
Any Legendary member (which OP referred to specifically) can make way more than $20/week, and I don't see them as being the problem with shitposts--maybe the drama threads, but members who've been around a few years tend to make interesting posts, if not always substantial ones.  It's usually the people who come here for the sole purpose of earning money through bounties that are the problem.

But anyway, I haven't seen any major decline in bitcointalk in the past few years.  It seemed to be waaay worse before the merit system was implemented, and that was over two years ago.  I'm also pretty sure the real decline started when signature campaigns took off, but that was around 2012 or so if I'm not mistaken.  It was certainly already bad when I registered in 2015.

Came back from a break
How long was your break?

The pharmacist say while spamming bitmixer and foxpops avatar. Milking the forum for every cent it can squeezes out of it
Previously he was caught sneaking under a sock puppet to spam other sigs and got caught because he was attempting to move out of a campaign with that puppet account for one that had slightly higher payout.

When he was challenged to present his biggest achievement here in the last 5 years. He said it was getting on to the chipmixer sig campaign.
Lol at the problem with those just wanting to earn from sigs.
What a slimeball.
The OP is entirely correct. The "legends" that remain are a disgrace to their elders and betters.
The forum has suffered a huge brain drain. The standard of general debate and reason has plunge to a level where any average person can arrive and immediately recognised they are surrounded by imbeciles.

The alt market diluted itself to destruction for the majority of projects. So all those earning meager returns from gaming the board and bounties have paused. The next bull will see them return.

The technical board's will retain a certain level since they key contributors and enthusiasts are largely untouched by the other board's.
A ton of bots and spammers that you could avoid to a large degree have left for now. A huge number of excellent contributors and sharp minds are long gone. Before 2013 and certainly before 2016 the was always numerous interesting debates and discussions where you would learn something useful. Now most of the boards are regurgitated "opinions" that ate poorly considered.  Not that it matters because it's usually an opinion on something entirely moronic.

This is the problem when most are here to make up their chipmixer max quota.
It is still a valuable resource for information but not meta board.


full member
Activity: 658
Merit: 126
Actually, the forum is improving in my opinion. Many people had quit since it became hard to gain easy profit but still, there is a lot of spamming and scamming going on especially in the altcoin section.

To extend on what btcltcdigger said, people tend to spam when they can't get the post requirement even though they may be seniors members with good posts history, you can't expect them to constructively post all the time. Just browse some topic in the beginner section, you will see people answering the same question many times. Though, we can avoid this if bounty managers lower the post requirement or for example cancel the minimum post requirement and impose a maximum so that members don't get forced to complete the requirement. This way, their payment will be proportional to their posts and they don't risk not getting paid.

This is really a great suggestion, but I doubt campaign managers will agree, they need more exposure for the campaign. But imagine without the pressure of achieving the minimum post required, or having lower mimimum post requirement, they can be relaxed in understanding and researching the topic before posting something just because they needed to. They can have more time of research especially when the topic is a little bit difficult to comprehend. This way, the forum will have more constructive post.

hero member
Activity: 1974
Merit: 756
To boldly go where no rabbit has gone before...

You still don't. You care about potential money it can bring you

Don't we all? For those who say "for the tech" or non-monetary profit, I call BS. Wink

True words my friend, true words
hero member
Activity: 2016
Merit: 531
FREE passive income eBook @ tinyurl.com/PIA10

You still don't. You care about potential money it can bring you

Don't we all? For those who say "for the tech" or non-monetary profit, I call BS. Wink
legendary
Activity: 2520
Merit: 1721
MrStork Exchange Service
-snip-
Signature campaigns...
When you have to make 60 posts a week to make $20, people tend to shitpost all over the place.
-snip-
Yes, that's one of the reasons, that the signature changes a person's quality when targeted to have to complete 60 posts a week.
Especially when the yobit signature makes old accounts come back to life and fills the forum with lots of junk posts.

But for accounts that do contribute a lot to the forum, the posts they make remain in control and not out of topic, the quality of the post remains priority..
hero member
Activity: 1974
Merit: 756
To boldly go where no rabbit has gone before...
I expected OP to have been registered in 2010 or something. Instead it's 2017. It is really saying that quality here is lower than it was then when it was heaving with ICO garbage and bounty zombies?

Perhaps they're thinking of somewhere else.

Many joined during the boom. Even I myself discovered this forum when the interest spiked up. Before that, I didn't even give two shits about crypto Cheesy

You still don't. You care about potential money it can bring you
hero member
Activity: 2016
Merit: 531
FREE passive income eBook @ tinyurl.com/PIA10
I expected OP to have been registered in 2010 or something. Instead it's 2017. It is really saying that quality here is lower than it was then when it was heaving with ICO garbage and bounty zombies?

Perhaps they're thinking of somewhere else.

Many joined during the boom. Even I myself discovered this forum when the interest spiked up. Before that, I didn't even give two shits about crypto Cheesy
hero member
Activity: 2464
Merit: 934
I joined in aug 2017, and tbh quality wise this forum is at far better place than before.
sr. member
Activity: 542
Merit: 251
Just wanted to share this. Came back from a break, now it's full of rubbish threads by "legendaries" whored accounts that discuss rubbish, looks like one of the fake forum on forumwarz. WTF.
I think this is true in the digital goods market place. I remember when I joined it wasn't so bad, but now it just seems to be hacked accounts and such without actual solid things for sale.
legendary
Activity: 2310
Merit: 1075
Just wanted to share this. Came back from a break, now it's full of rubbish threads by "legendaries" whored accounts that discuss rubbish, looks like one of the fake forum on forumwarz. WTF.

isn't it already full of rubbish discussion even before? but the thing is since the forum grew so much this forum is now more than just about the talks about bitcoin and it is inevitable to have a rubbish discussion. and
to be honest, the forum is a lot better than before.
Pages:
Jump to: