Topic: The real Satoshi? - page 2. (Read 373 times)
Why name yourself Satoshi if your name is Solotshi, what is the point of being anon? This will result like the Dorian Nakamoto thing.
It could be a reason that Satoshi was a criminal, thus he wanted to protect his identity in order not to give to the invention the name of "the creation of a criminal" and make people think that it is something bad.
This would be a great case that Solotshi was the creator that never passed my mind.
You don't have evidence if satoshi was a criminal then.
It could be a reason that Satoshi was a criminal, thus he wanted to protect his identity in order not to give to the invention the name of "the creation of a criminal" and make people think that it is something bad.
This would be a great case that Solotshi was the creator that never passed my mind.
If we are going to based his backgrounds, skillset and ideas he can really be a good candidate to the real Satoshi as they are basing the writing style of paul to Satoshi. However the very big question that came into my mind after reading the whole story.
If Paul is really the real satoshi who is now in Jail (the fact that he is currently in Jail and was been investigated already. I think it is rarely impossible that the investigation team won't be able to find any trace of him as the founder of Bitcoin). The writing style also can easily be copied or having a similarity is not that very solid proof.
If Paul is really the real satoshi who is now in Jail (the fact that he is currently in Jail and was been investigated already. I think it is rarely impossible that the investigation team won't be able to find any trace of him as the founder of Bitcoin). The writing style also can easily be copied or having a similarity is not that very solid proof.
Jump to: