When it comes to reputability among companies, it is always relative, we can't say that a reputable company can't do a thing with 100% assurance, we should only vouch for ourselves and give them some degree of doubt regardless of what we perceive them to be. A lot is happening underground in companies that you may not know, and if truly a company is reputable, are their employees? Bad actors could be found in the sanest environment, they are just desperate for the benefit. That is another angle I like you to view it from.
I know a few companies they've called out in the past in this regard despite people believing they are reputable, and in most cases, the employees with that responsibility may be sacked or changed as the case may be after investigation, but has the deed not been done already despite the management are innocent? There are also individual cases that are secluded when the customers are persons of interest. For these, we should always know that our data are no longer private when shared so far it is human beings we are dealing with.
Yes, bro, you are right. This thing you said actually made me remember a telecommunications company in my country that once had issues with network disruptions some years ago. According to the news, the reason for their network disruption was because of the bad actor that was working underground for that company. For all his years of service, the company did not know that the staff didn't have good intentions for the company.
For customers that are using that network in my country, before you purchase a sim card, you will have to pass their KYC requirements during the sim registration, and what if the bad staff has its hand on all the vital information of customers? That was just what I was wondering about.
For the majority of us, that is what we think. I know it's crazy but I think anomalies can also happen secretly on them, so it's better to not be confident at all times and defend them because they might only laugh at us in the background.
You are right.
