Topic: The success of a project is not the responsibility of bounty hunters alone - page 4. (Read 428 times)

Lol If it's right so why they still run bounty campaign. When you meet some one say like that, just ask so why he still launches bounty campaign?

I have come across some people who said/say, "Bounty hunters have nothing to contribute to our projects."
                                                                                                 OR
                                                              "We did not see the impact of bounty hunters on our project, therefore we are not paying them or better still we will reduce their reward."
                                                                                                 OR
                                                              " There are no investors on this forum."

These are all flimsy excuses given by the team whose projects failed.
They forgot to ask themselves if their projects are truly presentable or if their project has what it takes to convince the interests of potential investors.

The duty of a bounty hunter is not to get money out of the pocket of an investor to invest in a project, rather, it is to just create awareness about the project. E.g, by wearing the signature and avatar of the project on the forum. This will only call the attention of the investor. It is now left for such a project to showcase the stuff it is made of. If it contains nothing meaningful, I am sorry, it might not succeed, no matter how much awareness or marketing is done. Only very few projects scale through this without good substance, which is now very rare.

Gone are the days that investors invest blindly. They now take their time to study and analyze the project before giving out their money.
If you notice, people come on the telegram groups of projects to ask questions and if they are not satisfied, they leave.

Therefore, bounty hunters should not be blamed if a project fails, rather, the developers should go back to the drawing board and correct whatever needs to be corrected. Better still, they should ensure that they have done what is needed to be done, before coming to present what they have for the crypto community.