we (Diamond[DMD]) can fulfill all requirements beside non moderated thread
in my opinion a clean up of thread by remove as example bug-reports of already fixed bugs and so on make reading the thread much easier
moderating of a thread is well used not a tool of censorship but a tool to reduce redundant information and outdated info
s
Sorry but I disagree. There's NO EXCUSE WHATSOEVER to have censorship on official threads, IRCs, etc. The ONLY "reason" for it is to effect absolute control over what is posted and that goes against the most basic rule of freedom, the freedom of speech. And, I would add, against what crypto is supposed to represent. Threads shouldn't be "easy" to read; they should be free. And, like everything, such freedom comes with positives and negatives. The former so far outweight the later that it shouldn't even be a consideration.
As for the excuse regarding repetition or outdated posts -which is not a negative for many researching would like to know not only that the bug got fixed but what the process was to get it fixed-, it is easily solved by keeping the OPs promptly and adequately updated -which should be a top priority for all the people in charge-.
Self-moderated threads should be closed and replaced for non-moderated ones. It is that simple and anyone who has nothing to hide, should clearly see the need for this and act accordingly... immediately if they want to be considered for entry in THE WALL OF HONOR.
ADT v1 was not self moderated and we had a whole load of issues with people promoting other coins in the thread when we moved to ADT v2.0 we went for self moderated to stop us having to contact the mods every day to get spam removed the only way we will ever swap back is if the comunaty want it and I don't see that happening any time soon if coins are not on the list just because of self moderated it proves that you have no interest In doing the right thing
Well we are going to have to agree to disagree then on that point. Freedom of speech will never, under any and all circumstances, be even up for discussion. And if you believe that it is because I have no interest in doing "the right thing", that's just too bad; reality is that,
best case scenario, you just choose not to deal with a supposed problem of spam. It is
your choice. I cannot be more clear about this one:
No censorship of ANY kind for ANY reason whatsoever.
I think you should consider modifying that criteria. For example, the
SolarCoin Forum has occasionally had problems with spammers posting ads for prescription drugs and other random consumer goods, etc. Obvious kinds of spam. Naturally, our forum admin deletes that crap. I hope that doesn't mean SolarCoin would be automatically excluded from consideration for the Wall of Honor.
As a matter of fact, Solarcoin IS being considered for entry in THE WALL OF HONOR list. And, I am afraid, there will not be exceptions regarding that basic requirement. As yoiu can see, we deal with spam, hatred, racism and all kinds of SHIT like that here. So can you.
In principle and pending further research, Solarcoin does indeed have many requirements we look forward in candidates to our WALL OF HONOR. But is your official threads, IRCs, Twitters, etc. are moderated, sorry but it just won't do.