Pages:
Author

Topic: theoretically there are 21 mil btcs, in reality, many bitcoins are lost (Read 2165 times)

sr. member
Activity: 259
Merit: 250
100% Positive EBAY Feedback Since 2001
Oh boy, it's this discussion again. This point holds for any limited resource.

I think that either DannyHamilton or DeathAndTaxes gave a pretty reasonable explanation into this whole economic edge to the limited supply dwindling, though there's no way that I'm likely to find it.

Good explanation from DannyHamilton responding to this thread: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/bitcoin-extinction-647618

So to the point...how does a capped financial system, which at some point will only be able to diminish in total quantity (and will do so continuously) manage to escape eventual extinction (regardless of divisibility), or at the very least dramatically reduced availability to the point of compromising the very economies it creates...?

Regardless of divisibility?

What do you mean by "regardless of divisibility"?

Divisibility is exactly the reason that this isn't a concern.

As bitcoins are lost, the available supply is reduced.  Economic effects result in the remaining bitcoins being worth more.  This means that instead of spending 10 mBTC for a sandwich, you are eventually spending 10 µBTC (see how divisibility makes that possible?).  As a result, the remaining bitcoins are spread thinner.  This means that each individual with the same wealth has less bitcoins than they would have had in the past.

If any of these individuals lose their bitcoins, the supply is diminished, and the value of the remaining bitcoins increases.  Eventually (a few centuries from now) instead of spending 10 µBTC for a sandwich, you'll be spending 10 nBTC.  As a result, the remaining bitcoins are spread thinner.  This means that each individual with the same wealth has less bitcoins than they would have had in the past.

If any of these individuals lose their bitcoins, the supply is diminished, and the value of the remaining bitcoins increases.  Eventually (a few millennia from now) instead of spending 10 nBTC for a sandwich, you'll be spending 10 pBTC.  As a result, the remaining bitcoins are spread thinner.  This means that each individual with the same wealth has less bitcoins than they would have had in the past.

And so on, and so on.

Eventually there is only 1 pBTC (0.000000000001 BTC) remaining in existence.  But because of divisibility, it is broken into 1,000,000,000,000 yBTC pieces spread throughout the economy.

This process can repeat as many times as you like.

sr. member
Activity: 378
Merit: 250
And don't forget the satoshi's being left like garbage by ppl who don't care. That's still happening everyday
legendary
Activity: 1260
Merit: 1029
No need to put decimals on satoshi (if it ever happens that 1 satoshi is 1$). You have Namecoins and other coins that have far less value than Bitcoin which can serve that purpouse. Some of them are mined together already so security of network is same. Basicly, price would be: 1.99 which would be 1 satoshi and 99 namecoins or something similar.
There are enough altcoins that are tied to Bitcoin that can release pressure.
full member
Activity: 210
Merit: 100
It's safe to assume that from now and into the future the number of lost Bitcoins will not increase very much, because in the past people didn't think much of Bitcoins and formatted drives without thinking twice.

I agree with this very much. LOL

Yeah, it is true, people who buy BTC with their hard earned money nowadays know about the real world price of them so they just don't lose track of them. But it'll happen today and even tomorrow, since there'll always be people who just don't pay attention and format their hard-drive, don't have backups, lose their phones, etc...
BTC will always be lost! Imagine having the only remaining BTC while all the others are lost!

True! It'll get less, that's for sure. At least as long as bitcoin continues to gain value! But coins are bound to get lost by definition. Once really lost, they can't effectively be recovered. This is bound to happen at some point and in some quantities.
sr. member
Activity: 378
Merit: 250
FURring bitcoin up since 1762
It's safe to assume that from now and into the future the number of lost Bitcoins will not increase very much, because in the past people didn't think much of Bitcoins and formatted drives without thinking twice.

I agree with this very much. LOL

Yeah, it is true, people who buy BTC with their hard earned money nowadays know about the real world price of them so they just don't lose track of them. But it'll happen today and even tomorrow, since there'll always be people who just don't pay attention and format their hard-drive, don't have backups, lose their phones, etc...
BTC will always be lost! Imagine having the only remaining BTC while all the others are lost!
member
Activity: 98
Merit: 10
★☆★Bitin.io★☆★
This might be an issue in the distant future. If current life expectancy doesn't improve dramatically none of us will be here to worry about it. If it becomes a big enough issue the developers at that time can add a minimal amount of block reward coins back in to keep a stable supply.  

by simply adding another million to the circulation is inflationary..
no thanks..

i would rather have it that in a few decades time once it starts nearing the 20th million boarder of bitcoins mined, that people realise that there are only 19mill in active circulation, thus the fight for hoarding coins gets that much stronger. and people realise that 1-5% cant be accessed.

it will teach people to be more careful and increase the rarity factor. adding excess coins would ruin the scarcity factor and ruin the whole trust that bitcoin cant be tinkered with. after all if they add 1mill extra in a few years, whats to stop them keep adding extra's later

now i will meander over to gold.

you realise that old tech (defunked computers) end up in landfill, making precios metals like gold become 'out of circulation' the amount of sunked pirate ships over the centuries with chsts of gold coins, lay at bottoms of the oceans, out of circulation.. lets not suddenly start making gold using bacterial waste to counter gold stocks.

keep bitcoin rare, keep it away from inflation


I completely agree in principal. With divisibility the supply is much larger than the 21 million obviously. I was just exploring the what if scenario. It is a habit I have that annoys my wife at times as well.
legendary
Activity: 4410
Merit: 4766
This might be an issue in the distant future. If current life expectancy doesn't improve dramatically none of us will be here to worry about it. If it becomes a big enough issue the developers at that time can add a minimal amount of block reward coins back in to keep a stable supply.  

by simply adding another million to the circulation is inflationary..
no thanks..

i would rather have it that in a few decades time once it starts nearing the 20th million boarder of bitcoins mined, that people realise that there are only 19mill in active circulation, thus the fight for hoarding coins gets that much stronger. and people realise that 1-5% cant be accessed.

it will teach people to be more careful and increase the rarity factor. adding excess coins would ruin the scarcity factor and ruin the whole trust that bitcoin cant be tinkered with. after all if they add 1mill extra in a few years, whats to stop them keep adding extra's later

now i will meander over to gold.

you realise that old tech (defunked computers) end up in landfill, making precios metals like gold become 'out of circulation' the amount of sunked pirate ships over the centuries with chsts of gold coins, lay at bottoms of the oceans, out of circulation.. lets not suddenly start making gold using bacterial waste to counter gold stocks.

keep bitcoin rare, keep it away from inflation
sr. member
Activity: 406
Merit: 250
This might be an issue in the distant future. If current life expectancy doesn't improve dramatically none of us will be here to worry about it. If it becomes a big enough issue the developers at that time can add a minimal amount of block reward coins back in to keep a stable supply. 
sr. member
Activity: 252
Merit: 250
I mean, many bitcoins exist in block chain, but nobody in the world knows their private key. They are in a unspendable state. Anyone has a guess how many these coins are?
From economy point of view, a healthy currency should grow its supply at the small rate, to reflect more human output, and not inflate itself. Bitcoin is a deflationary currency, and the rate of deflation probably greater than we think.

Yes, when u think about it, its pretty scary how deflationary bitcoin is.
Alot of coins generated in the start were lost/forgotten, and with each new day, u probably have some new cases of loosing coins.

While the actual accurate data is a mistery, im happy with deflation; it makes bitcoin even more rare, and i believe that is a good thing.

Cheers

legendary
Activity: 1789
Merit: 1008
Keep it dense, yeah?
Oh boy, it's this discussion again. This point holds for any limited resource.

I think that either DannyHamilton or DeathAndTaxes gave a pretty reasonable explanation into this whole economic edge to the limited supply dwindling, though there's no way that I'm likely to find it.
legendary
Activity: 1722
Merit: 1000
Satoshi is rolling in his grave. #bitcoin
I mean, many bitcoins exist in block chain, but nobody in the world knows their private key. They are in a unspendable state. Anyone has a guess how many these coins are?
From economy point of view, a healthy currency should grow its supply at the small rate, to reflect more human output, and not inflate itself. Bitcoin is a deflationary currency, and the rate of deflation probably greater than we think.

Yes, when u think about it, its pretty scary how deflationary bitcoin is.
Alot of coins generated in the start were lost/forgotten, and with each new day, u probably have some new cases of loosing coins.

While the actual accurate data is a mistery, im happy with deflation; it makes bitcoin even more rare, and i believe that is a good thing.

Cheers
sr. member
Activity: 405
Merit: 250
100 million satoshis to a bitcoin...consider for example 1 satashoi eventually getting to $1  1 bitcoin would then = $100 Million or large enough for a small economy.

haha, dream big! Only if USD turns into Zimbabwe dollar, which is a possibility.

LOL  I do not expect that to happen in my/our lifetimes but in a few hundred years? maybe..maybe not as there may be something totally different..in the future and my crystal ball is in need of repair

However the UK average wage for working folk 300 yrs ago was   approx 15 pounds a year..In 2013 it was 26,500 pounds a year almost a 2.000 fold increase

http://www.johnhearfield.com/History/Breadt.htm


If a bitcoin would follow a similar path ..in 300 yrs it would be 2,000 times its current $ value ( $120,000 or equivalent ,assuming the dollar still exists which I doubt ) . The difference being is that the bitcoin price has not yet stabilized for the comparison so we will wait and see (probably about 5 yrs at current adoption rate) what level that will be.
newbie
Activity: 18
Merit: 0
I know that someday there will be lots of people including me looking through old drives and long forgotten websites searching for that 4 or 5 satoshi that might be still there
sr. member
Activity: 336
Merit: 260
100 million satoshis to a bitcoin...consider for example 1 satashoi eventually getting to $1  1 bitcoin would then = $100 Million or large enough for a small economy.

haha, dream big! Only if USD turns into Zimbabwe dollar, which is a possibility.
sr. member
Activity: 405
Merit: 250
Does not matter.

1 bitcoin could be used for the economy of a small country.

+1

100 million satoshis to a bitcoin...consider for example 1 satashoi eventually getting to $1  1 bitcoin would then = $100 Million or large enough for a small economy.

It is obvious that if ever it starts to come close to that value in the distant future.. the satoshi itself will probably be divisible to however many decimal places is required

Here's one of the threads where the issue is discussed from 2011

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4020.20

What the OP is talking about here would likely take hundreds of years to happen.  BitCoins aren't going to leach out of the system that fast.  Besides, if BitCoins succeed I bet it will only be 5 or 10 years before someone else starts another digital currency akin to BitCoins.  It is likely that if Crypto Currency takes off you will have several different ones competing with each other and so the whole world won't have to exclusively use BitCoins.

Adding another decimal place to the RIGHT of the zero isn't inflation.  1 BTC will still be 1 BTC, you simply will be able to use smaller portions of it in your transactions.
legendary
Activity: 3598
Merit: 2386
Viva Ut Vivas
Does not matter.

1 bitcoin could be used for the economy of a small country.
full member
Activity: 154
Merit: 100
I suppose the more lost coins the better for us!
hero member
Activity: 742
Merit: 502
Circa 2010
I doubt we'll have as significant losses as we have had in the past considering that people are more aware of the value of Bitcoin rather than it being a worthless piece of data on your drives. It's the same with wallets, you would check the contents before you chucked it out to make sure you don't have any cash in there. Aside from claims, there is no verifiable means of proving that the coins are in an address where the private key is unknown.
hero member
Activity: 686
Merit: 500
Personally I think the more bitcoin that gets lost the higher the value should go. I say this because there is less to go around. If we are all sharing a piece of big pie that has 19million slices it is certainly worth more then the same pie that has 21million slices.

Naturally. Supply and demand and all that. What did Satoshi say about lost coins? Something about a gift to the rest of us. Grin
sr. member
Activity: 252
Merit: 250
Personally I think the more bitcoin that gets lost the higher the value should go. I say this because there is less to go around. If we are all sharing a piece of big pie that has 19million slices it is certainly worth more then the same pie that has 21million slices.
Pages:
Jump to: