Topic: THEYMOS, CYRUS, COBRA - RED TRUST THE SCAMMERS NEW WEAPON - page 2. (Read 820 times)

Would it be optimistic to ask for a list of names, or are you just going to continue ranting vaguely?

Yes, and that's because of all the threads cryptohunter started and all of the other ones he's posted in.  And now it appears he's at it again with a new account, rehashing the same old shit and thinking a new account with an unsullied reputation will convince everyone that the same BS arguments have any validity.

Don't be fooled.  Put OP on ignore just like I suggested everyone put cryptohunter on ignore, else it's going to be the same growing snowball of nonsense that the forum has already been hit with since this past December or so.

Its been discussed ad nauseam. There aren't any intentions on forcing people to adhere to a standard set of rules for who you can or can't find suspicious. People have differences of opinions on what constitutes being red trust worthy. If someone makes a bad judgement call, then people will disregard their feedback. If that person has a history of poor quality feedback, they end up removed from DT.

Anyway, local rules aren't absolute. You can use them to tell individual people that are harassing that they aren't allowed to post, but if you say that no one with a S, T, X, or Z in their username may post in my threads, the moderators won't help you out.

If you don't have something good to say, You better remain silent or go somewhere else with your Dog. 

Since this seems to be an experiment week, i assume you trying to figure out whether or not a post like this will be deleted.

Why start a whole thread to discuss only with 4 members whom one is not an admin, another one invented btc and left ( probably won't come back only to read your b.s) and the other two are  probably too busy to reply you, whatever is it you smoking is killing the last bits of brains cells on you.

If your post is not deleted then there should be a good explanation of why. I notice other persons (not DT members) not complying with the local rules are deleted. I am reporting it now. I will see what happens.

Please stop spamming your signature at every given chance. Or remove it. All of these huge mixing, gambling sigs in meta that are being worn by the DT members are blinding.

If you don't want other forum members responding to the thread then you should have sent them individual PMs, PASS

Local rules - only the most senior admin may comment on this thread.  

Only Cobra, Cyrus and Theymos may reply. Satoshi can chime in, if he feels strongly about the situation, which I expect he would.

Red trust is clearly being used by certain DT members as a weapon to silence whistle blowers and crush free speech here in general.

If anyone mentions the prior observable wrong doing of certain DT members they are immediately given red trust to silence them.
One needs to only say they will encourage others to review those DT's post histories and you will get red trust.
If one complains and tell the DT members they are not allowed to give red trust for presenting facts regarding them or their friends wrong doing. They they say " I can, I will, and I just have". Their abuse is brazen and open.

This is 100% perverting the very reason for having default trust.

I can bring clear observable evidence to demonstrate what I am claiming is true and taking place on this forum.

What are you going to do about this situation?  It seems a core of about 5 or 6 DT are doing this, but the entire DT system is full of others that will do NOTHING about this kind of abuse and will actually condone it.

There are numerous instances of clear double standards and corrupt behavior.

The implications for free speech here are quite bleak. It seems irresponsible to allow individuals that have been demonstrated untrustworthy on numerous occasions to be given leverage on this board to gain trust of the most vulnerable and silence any whistle blowers. Since their past untrustworthy behaviors are clearly observable there can be no sensible and responsible reason to let them continue in these positions of trust that leaves the entire board vulnerable to their actions.

Why are these people not blacklisted from the trust system?

At the very least bring them in line with a clear RULE. Red trust to be issued for proven scams and scammers or those you can present a STRONG case are about to scam or have scammed. All other red trust must be removed and those breaking this rule will be black listed?

What is so difficult about issuing this command to save the board from this abusive and corrupt bunch of DT members that have grasped control of the trust system?

Other members seem to have recognized this a while back