Topic: THEYMOS - FACTS BASED POST - only interested in hearing HIS OPINION . Thanks. (Read 1126 times)

Please moron do not seek to silence me with your stupid remarks and sexual deviance any longer.

Read my what makes a HQ LQ thread. Then come back after that free education.

Opinions without accompanying reason/evidence/logic  that form the basis of that said opinion are not validated and therefore suspect if there are contrasting opinions that are accompanied by a strong case.

Find a flaw in the OP and present it or fuck off you demented little gimp.

You consider Lauda unethical or sub-optimal, also there nothing much good done by her here rather than just gaining trusts with exhortations and scamming or threatening users here.


Yes, you are not the one to decide her actions on the net, but you should judge her here on the forum and show what you think about here on here trust ratings. Also, you should take care that scammer should not gain power in the forums trust system which is totally ignored by you here.

Read the title of your threat you tard

Most sensible attempt at a refutation so far.

I only have one question...

What does the fox say?





I gotta say, you do ramble a lot... and I sometimes tend to ramble myself, but you are driving me insane.
I tried following your thought process for a while but whew...

Before you attack me, here's a little something from Pharrel Williams to put it all into perspective, and soothe your soul at the same time:

https://youtu.be/ZbZSe6N_BXs?t=53
Here come bad news, talking this and that.
Well, give me all you got, don't hold it back.
Well, I should probably warn ya, I'll be just fine.
No offense to you, don’t waste your time.

Because I'm happpyyy

Clap along if you feel like a room without a roof
Clap along if you feel like happiness is the truth
Clap along if you know what happiness is to you
Clap along if you feel like that's what you wanna do!


... good luck with your fight.

You obviously are or you are trying to get off topic. Successful refutation of my central point that invalidates it.

So let me simplify for you suchscamoon.

Prove (with evidence where the OP is saying something untruthful or unreasonable.  A successful refutation of my central points.

I mean just objecting or just saying no to something can be a rebuttal.

Typical suchscamoon. Won't provide any attempt at a successful refutation but will try to divert on some small point to direct away from the fact he has no counter.

I'm starting to think there is another meaning of this word and we're just too stupid to understand what's being asked.

Moron don't try to sound intelligent. You are observably stupid.

Now

1. tried to bring a rebuttal is not bringing one. Please understand what a rebuttal is first.
2. bring me the exact rebuttal (there is not one) or make your own (this will be funny) or just remain silent?

Don't ask me where ... lol

Stop sig spamming and remain silent unless you bring new substantiated relevant information. I am trying to train you monkeys in the hq lq post.

Read that thread and do not reply unless your post meets those criteria.

Those smarter than you are not attempting to refute the OP because they know it is impossible to refute the facts therein contained.

Some may give unsubstantiated opinions but no rebuttal. Try to understand bitch.

So nobody reply until you can bring a sensible fact based rebuttal. No point you all just cycling over and over with groundless opinions.

Bitch look:

People have tried bringing rebuttal to you, you just like other shitposters who type huge walls of texts, ignored it. Don't ask me where, I'm not going to search it for you, because its there literally in every fucking you keep writing tremendously blegh type of posts.

Can you FFS get some closure, and deal things in a normal way? I'd suggest getting rid of the wall texts but I guess its too late for that.

There is no "gang". Just Lauda's alts.

LOL - please settle down fool.

He gave an opinion not a fact based rebuttal. I'm sorry that you can not understand ... go read the what makes a hq and lq post thread I have provided. Then have a think about that.

Theymos just has a different definition of scam than what is here https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/scam  and to the vast majority of  of the board at the time the details of the scam was widely broken

Theymos has not maybe read the entire OP actually it seems that he states that .

Calm down moron and relax. There is no need to get upset this is a reasonable debate based on observable events. Nothing more.

Pick one tiny segment of the OP (about all your mind can cope with) and pick it apart using facts and logical debate. I will entertain you.

FACT... DO NOT DERAIL THIS THREAD - ON TOPIC.

Theymos said fuck off...

Oh some very different speculations on my point of starting this thread..... interesting.


Look to every person here it is a very simple challenge - well perhaps not for most of you but still..

1. examine the OP

2. bring forth a rebuttal based on fact.


I see nothing but an opinion of a person but if they would engage me in a real debate it would prove impossible to maintain this those opinions using

1. the accepted definition of a scam

2. the observable events.

The only part of Theymos reply that is possible to entertain in light of the facts and the definition of a scam https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/scam

Is that Lauda (although by suchmoons and my own definition is untrustworthy/scammer needing red trust)....by Theymos definition (who does not for some reason accept darkcoin/dash as a scam or believe maybe that lauda was part of an extortion attempt or believe his escrow actions are negative or negative enough to counter his good works.) may choose to believe Lauda is up for debate weighing his bad and good deed against each other.

 This is a possible view point to take. However for me TRUST is different from net postive or net negative in terms of you can not do untrustworthy things, then do some useful things and become trustworthy again. Well not worth risking if you have people that have never done anything at all untrustworthy and done some good things.


I mean for sure if you can find some rebuttal - bring it and we can debate it.

This is what forums are for debating. Let's see.

I mean If I am keeping you from making some merit stats or whatever no need to reply.

I see no rebuttal only opinions.

GO VISIT WHAT MAKES A HQ AND LQ post get an idea of what your post should contain.

I think that he bet on Theymos not giving a f*** about this topic and that would have turned him  (in his own mind) in some kind of virgin martyr that is suffering every second screaming for help while wild batcats are tearing her apart.

There are lots of people who are actually afraid of completing their lifelong objective as that would leave them without a purpose in life, ch is the same, he needs this whole nonsense to go on as without it he has nothing to do around here.
Damn this whole drama reminds me of a Graham Greene book...

and you are trying to get some attention from the people that cryptohunter thinks are in the same gang?  

Ding ding ding, was waiting for that one, guess what your prize is?

Maybe theymos is also part of the "gang".

Did OP really expect theymos would be on his side?

It’s got to be temp ban level trolling right now