Pages:
Author

Topic: @Theymos - how about verifying for Brave/BAT? Easy extra revenue. - page 3. (Read 838 times)

legendary
Activity: 2674
Merit: 2965
Terminated.
Meaning you support of FED/US Gov when accepting US$? Meaning you supported/endorsed every project/person you took BTC from? Is that your honest policy or just bullshit you came up with for the sake of replying because your ego won't let you to let it go?
Non sequitur. Your pathetic excuse of a meat-bag can't even create a single valid argument for your own case.

Don't ask me to fuck-off. Just walk away. It's that easy. Get some fresh air. It's nice.
Royally fuck off. You're an undesirable, just like BAT is. Were it desirable, it would have been added already. Unless thermos really needs the money, he needs to be out of his (flawed) mind to agree with this suggestion. Due to your sig.-based shitposting, I will have to introduce my ad naseum mode on this thread. Maybe The-One-Above-All will support your case. Smiley
legendary
Activity: 2436
Merit: 1561
...
Yes. Supporting or standing-by evil makes you no better than the evil itself.

Meaning you support of FED/US Gov when accepting US$? Meaning you supported/endorsed every project/person you took BTC from? Is that your honest policy or just bullshit you came up with for the sake of replying because your ego won't let you to let it go?

>Getting this triggered over forum post
You do have some issues don't you? Seriously, take regular breaks from internet sometime. Not even joking.
Seriously, fuck-off and stop shitposting with your signature elsewhere. This thread is worthless; not that anyone has agreed with you. Only BAT bagholders might come to voice their support, that's about it. Cancer, you and BAT both are.

Don't ask me to fuck-off. Just walk away. It's that easy. Get some fresh air. It's nice.

legendary
Activity: 2674
Merit: 2965
Terminated.
OK? How's that a reason not to accept/sell tokens from the ones who do use it?
Yes. Supporting or standing-by evil makes you no better than the evil itself.

>Getting this triggered over forum post
You do have some issues don't you? Seriously, take regular breaks from internet sometime. Not even joking.
Seriously, fuck-off and stop shitposting with your signature elsewhere. This thread is worthless; not that anyone has agreed with you. Only BAT bagholders might come to voice their support, that's about it. Cancer, you and BAT both are.
hero member
Activity: 2366
Merit: 838
The "privacy" browser demands kyc for publishers to receive their cryptocurrency
I think this incoherence is enough reason for theymos to avoid supporting such project.
And this is a Bitcoin forum. This forum has more than enough bitcoins, there is no reason to risk the forum and theymos' reputation supporting such a project
If I want to be private while browsing on the Internet, I will use Tor Browser as alternative to Brave browser. In fact, I used both of them but stopped using Brave months ago (around the time they asked for KYCs to receive BAT tokens). I agree with you that such the incoherence in their 'slogan' and their development activities and promotions recently are not good for their reputation.

There are still people who do KYCs just to earn BAT tokens from Brave browser and it is easily understandable because there are lots of people use Google Chrome or derivatives from Chrome and Google-related applications without fear of losing personal information.
legendary
Activity: 2436
Merit: 1561
You do realise that your post has zero substance other than "I don't like it"? BAT being garbage or not is irrelevant to the topic anyway, it has value - that's what matters.
Stop promoting shady shit such as BAT. Anything Chromium based is inherently never going to be as good as non-Google-injected software. He might as well give his parents names and daily routines to Google directly. BAT should have never existed, not the token nor the browser. The alternatives are much better despite being much smaller.

OK? How's that a reason not to accept/sell tokens from the ones who do use it?

The "privacy" browser demands kyc for publishers to receive their cryptocurrency
I think this incoherence is enough reason for theymos to avoid supporting such project.
And this is a Bitcoin forum. This forum has more than enough bitcoins, there is no reason to risk the forum and theymos' reputation supporting such a project
But MUH, you do realise that your post has zero substance? OP is an ignorant wanker hoping to score some cheap-ass merits. Maybe some of those generous-givers that throw merit at low-valued garbage such as Loyce might reward him for this. Theymos has sacrificed enough by introducing that half-arsed garbage Grin.

>Getting this triggered over forum post
You do have some issues don't you? Seriously, take regular breaks from internet sometime. Not even joking.

legendary
Activity: 3108
Merit: 3199
Looks like lauda is back from Summer holidays  Cheesy

@OP

I guess that he dont will be doing the verification for Brave .
Anyway i dont like this browser Brave and dont like the BAT, i tryd it but its for the trash can.
legendary
Activity: 2674
Merit: 2965
Terminated.
You do realise that your post has zero substance other than "I don't like it"? BAT being garbage or not is irrelevant to the topic anyway, it has value - that's what matters.
Stop promoting shady shit such as BAT. Anything Chromium based is inherently never going to be as good as non-Google-injected software. He might as well give his parents names and daily routines to Google directly. BAT should have never existed, not the token nor the browser. The alternatives are much better despite being much smaller.

The "privacy" browser demands kyc for publishers to receive their cryptocurrency
I think this incoherence is enough reason for theymos to avoid supporting such project.
And this is a Bitcoin forum. This forum has more than enough bitcoins, there is no reason to risk the forum and theymos' reputation supporting such a project
But MUH, you do realise that your post has zero substance? OP is an ignorant wanker hoping to score some cheap-ass merits. Maybe some of those generous-givers that throw merit at low-valued garbage such as Loyce might reward him for this. Theymos has sacrificed enough by introducing that half-arsed garbage called Grin.

Law doesn't excuse ignorance. Maybe flags shouldn't. Roll Eyes
legendary
Activity: 2436
Merit: 1561
Brave and their shit token are terrible. I would avoid getting involved with it. This pajeet revenue is unnecessary.

I've never supported their Chromium-based garbage and have been interested in flagging them ever since this garbage system was introduced. No time to look around yet though.

You do realise that your post has zero substance other than "I don't like it"? BAT being garbage or not is irrelevant to the topic anyway, it has value - that's what matters.
legendary
Activity: 2352
Merit: 6089
bitcoindata.science
Theymos will not risk his personal info to apply the KYC verification just to get those rewards from brave.

The "privacy" browser demands kyc for publishers to receive their cryptocurrency
I think this incoherence is enough reason for theymos to avoid supporting such project.
And this is a Bitcoin forum. This forum has more than enough bitcoins, there is no reason to risk the forum and theymos' reputation supporting such a project
legendary
Activity: 2674
Merit: 2965
Terminated.
Brave and their shit token are terrible. I would avoid getting involved with it. This pajeet revenue is unnecessary.

I've never supported their Chromium-based garbage and have been interested in flagging them ever since this garbage system was introduced. No time to look around yet though.
legendary
Activity: 2436
Merit: 1561
Theymos will not risk his personal info to apply the KYC verification just to get those rewards from brave.

He's not anonymous you know, and, to my understanding, he/forum complies with US laws so it's not like he's compromising anything + you don't submit any personal info to verify as publisher. Although you'd need to verify personal or business details with Uphold to withdraw/convert (currently they're the only ones processing payments for brave).

Much bigger entities bothered to do it (recently Wikipedia), and I wouldn't be surprised if BTCTalk had better earning potential.


* just another bitcoin-purist rant *
legendary
Activity: 1652
Merit: 4392
Be a bank
No.
There are lots of reasons why not, I guess this is one people won't pick up on too much:
, but such earnings (in BAT tokens) could be converted to BTC propping its price Wink
Market economics. You are so desperate to pump your kleptocurrency du jour you are willing to defy rationality.
Your stupid bats would be ever less valuable.

edit for those interested in researching this shit you could do worse than starting here https://archive.is/GElE9
https://twitter.com/J9Roem/status/940311559426985985
https://twitter.com/J9Roem/status/942857701662609409
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0rctxZWPi6A&t=7745s
copper member
Activity: 2142
Merit: 1305
Limited in number. Limitless in potential.
Theymos will not risk his personal info to apply the KYC verification just to get those rewards from brave.
legendary
Activity: 2436
Merit: 1561
With Brave getting decent traction and couple of big boys (including Wikipedia) signing up recently - it's kind of strange to see BTCTalk not yet being verified as publisher.

The overlap of Brave and BTCTalk users must be pretty big - so there's definitely great potential for extra, non-trivial revenue from tips and auto-contributions. All for the one time effort of verifying.

I understand prevailing anti-altcoin sentiment, but such earnings (in BAT tokens) could be converted to BTC propping its price Wink

I'm sure there are plenty of good ways to spent extra funds ie. on hiring more mods (or for increasing rewards for current ones), fighting spam, or just community contest etc.

Just a suggestion.



Pages:
Jump to: