Damn, Vod had registered one of the best IP addresses. How many bitcoins you paid for such static address???
I bet you registered the localhost as well, right?
You better change your nick to Rich, instead of Vod
Topic: @theymos is it true that you forced OG to remove Laudas tagg ? (Read 1784 times)
Damn, Vod had registered one of the best IP addresses. How many bitcoins you paid for such static address???
I bet you registered the localhost as well, right?
You better change your nick to Rich, instead of Vod
And i would like to ask to confirm your facebook profil to have proof that you are you which you denied last time.
Thule, I gave you Vod's IP about 6 months ago. Haven't you done anything with it yet? Your lawyers would be most interested in it, I'm sure.Here, I pinged him for you. Vod's IP address is 127.0.0.1. That should be all the info your lawyers need.
And thats his IP based on what proof ?
[But if you want to be included say the word please and i will do it quickly now since i will be in Toronto in June anyways.
I want to be included!!! "the word please". <--I actually said that out loud as you asked.
Anything else I need to do so I don't get bumped again on a technicality?
And i would like to ask to confirm your facebook profil to have proof that you are you which you denied last time.
That's some high quality lawyering right here. Do you want me to confirm my Geocities page?
i need to be present which was a waste of time.
Most people who live in the real world understand that you can't take someone to court unless you're in court too. That's not exactly going to change depending on whom you sue.Most people also don't consider non-frivoulous cases to be "a waste of time", but be sure to let the judge know how little you think of your own case.
I want to know how the lying pajeet is going to sue me in the UK when I live in BG and that fool lives In pajeet land, a pajeet who trades accounts yet happens to be in Canada and Bulgaria regularly.. imaginary friends imaginary private jet, imaginary wife.,
It’s all in his pajeet head,
i need to be present which was a waste of time.
Most people who live in the real world understand that you can't take someone to court unless you're in court too. That's not exactly going to change depending on whom you sue.Most people also don't consider non-frivoulous cases to be "a waste of time", but be sure to let the judge know how little you think of your own case.
You can write as much as you want but i don't wanna hear bitching about me when suchmoon is going to be hold responsible and that i didn't gave her a fair chance and warning to remove that abuse.
HEY - Why does suchmoon get to jump the line? You were suing me first, remember?
You are a big mouth Vod.
I didn't come after you for several reasons.One of them being the defention for negative trust feedbacks not clear.
Theymos changed that fact.Another one was because the chamber claimed i need to be present which was a waste of time.
But if you want to be included say the word please and i will do it quickly now since i will be in Toronto in June anyways.
And i would like to ask to confirm your facebook profil to have proof that you are you which you denied last time.
You can write as much as you want but i don't wanna hear bitching about me when suchmoon is going to be hold responsible and that i didn't gave her a fair chance and warning to remove that abuse.
HEY - Why does suchmoon get to jump the line? You were suing me first, remember?
You are choosing the way it goes.I'm only reacting based on your actions.
Do you not even remember your own fucking posts? less talk and more pajeet action please. 15 members of DT have tagged you so far - looking forward to seeing that grow.
Pajeet gonna Pajeet with Pajeet lawsuit and Pajeet talk from Pajeet land.
night night my little pajeet flower - come at me bro
Point me to the post where i stated that i worked with a lawyer during holidays .Would be a way easier proof than trying to manipulate by asking questions.
You are choosing the way it goes.I'm only reacting based on your actions.
Do you not even remember your own fucking posts? less talk and more pajeet action please. 15 members of DT have tagged you so far - looking forward to seeing that grow.
Pajeet gonna Pajeet with Pajeet lawsuit and Pajeet talk from Pajeet land.
night night my little pajeet flower - come at me bro
I guess everyone who is opening a lawsuite must be an extortionist in your defenition.
Less talk, more action Pajeet.
your lawyers worked on a holiday weekend in your pretend land, but I still see no OBSERVABLE EVIDENCE. Everything you post is a waste of internet space, it could be used for porn or cat pictures instead you know
Why do you claim they worked in a holiday weekend ?You started to put these arguments to me without having any claim from me about it.The Chamber was choosen way before holidays and it was them recommending me to post that offical thread and save the evidence that suchmoon have seen it.
You can write as much as you want but i don't wanna hear bitching about me when suchmoon is going to be hold responsible and that i didn't gave her a fair chance and warning to remove that abuse.
You are choosing the way it goes.I'm only reacting based on your actions.
I guess everyone who is opening a lawsuite must be an extortionist in your defenition.
Less talk, more action Pajeet.
your lawyers worked on a holiday weekend in your pretend land, but I still see no OBSERVABLE EVIDENCE. Everything you post is a waste of internet space, it could be used for porn or cat pictures instead you know
Why are you asking me to close that topic ?
Didn't you posted a feedback which is
You ask an extortionist to close the topic ?
and here suchmoon
Queen of manipulation.
Dangerously untrustworthy ......yeah because of what ?
Threatedned to sue forum users .....Why don't you describe it in full announcing to sue forum users who abused trust feedback against him ? Woudln't sound scammy anymore to majority right ?
False scam allegations ?Which ones ?The ones i offered Theymos to check himself ?
Where did i ever threatened with doxing someone @suchmoon ?
You just proofed again that you are the queen of manipulation and i'm happy i chosed you as first to feel legal actions.
Keep posting more of these kind of lies.I'm already collecting everything which you will have an opportunity to proof.
Also TheNewAnon and his defenition of extortion
So holding someone accountable for his abuse via lawsuite is extortion.
I guess everyone who is opening a lawsuite must be an extortionist in your defenition.
Nice to have the evidence that suchmoon even made the call to defame me which leaded instantly to more negative trust.
Have a nice one.
Didn't you posted a feedback which is
Quote
This user is trying to get users to remove their feedback through coercion, which is the definition of extortion. Extortion is a criminal offense.
You ask an extortionist to close the topic ?
and here suchmoon
Quote
In the 6 months since my original feedback Thule kept proving to be a dangerously untrustworthy individual. Threatened to sue forum users. Brought up false scam allegations. Now is demanding to remove negative feedback by threatening with doxing.
Queen of manipulation.
Dangerously untrustworthy ......yeah because of what ?
Threatedned to sue forum users .....Why don't you describe it in full announcing to sue forum users who abused trust feedback against him ? Woudln't sound scammy anymore to majority right ?
False scam allegations ?Which ones ?The ones i offered Theymos to check himself ?
Quote
Now is demanding to remove negative feedback by threatening with doxing.
Where did i ever threatened with doxing someone @suchmoon ?
You just proofed again that you are the queen of manipulation and i'm happy i chosed you as first to feel legal actions.
Keep posting more of these kind of lies.I'm already collecting everything which you will have an opportunity to proof.
Also TheNewAnon and his defenition of extortion
Quote
This user is trying to get users to remove their feedback through coercion, which is the definition of extortion. Extortion is a criminal offense.
So holding someone accountable for his abuse via lawsuite is extortion.
I guess everyone who is opening a lawsuite must be an extortionist in your defenition.
Nice to have the evidence that suchmoon even made the call to defame me which leaded instantly to more negative trust.
Have a nice one.
Why is this thread still open? OP's question has been answered and the ongoing conversation is turning into the same circlejerk as always.
I pressured several people to remove inappropriate, unconstructive ratings amongst each other.
So are you finally admitting you moderate trust ratings instead of trying to pretend you don't while working privately behind closed doors to manipulate and pressure people using your authority here to achieve the outcome which serves you personally by making administration simpler for you rather than being fair and equitable? It is almost like you are ignoring the real causes of these problems and they have happened before... No matter, there is no need for objective standards, you are Theymos, you ARE the law. Go anarchy.The anarchy comment was facetious. I don't think anarchy is viable for anything except small groups with high levels of trust. I was alluding to the fact that Theymos persists with these delusions of maintaining some kind of anarchist policies around here when he is literally doing the exact opposite. Anarchy means without rulers, not without rules, and the rules are completely arbitrary and arbitrarily enforced, and he is essentially a dictator so... pretending anarchy is anywhere in this is a joke. If anything I would categorize the form of government Theymos is fostering on the forum as some where between and Oligopoly and Democracy aka mob rule, and then a Dictatorship when he deems it convenient.
We need OBJECTIVE standards for negative rating users, such as proof of theft, violation of contractual agreement, or violation of applicable laws. The free for all itself is a security risk, as once some group or entity has control of a sufficient number of highly ranked accounts it can then use that leverage to force compliance with anything it chooses, including staying quiet about theft or other genuinely fraudulent activity. This is not just a bad system but a HUGE security hole.
No way theymos will do this as admin could easily create an account for Lauda if it has something done or wrong with the Lauda's current account. Besides, why theymos bother to force one member to remove negative trust?
This is just probably a hearsay and in my opinion this is not happening. We know that bitcointalk account were very precious but dignity and honor does more important.
Anyway, I guess it would be good if all will just keep calm and remove the negativities and stop bashing every users here in the forum.
This is just probably a hearsay and in my opinion this is not happening. We know that bitcointalk account were very precious but dignity and honor does more important.
Anyway, I guess it would be good if all will just keep calm and remove the negativities and stop bashing every users here in the forum.
>in my opinion
This is a spam, I'll leave you a bagillion negative trusts and petition UN to ban you and move you to a cave. How dare you?
Who cares why he did it and did he actually.
I Was going to reply to his b.s in another topic , but then i didn't want to be mean to him , but now that somebody mentioned it - look at his posts, he made 10 useless posts in about an hour, he is a perfect example of a "Professional shitposter".
Go read the goddamned thread.
Sorry for the merit... like OG says "I agreed with your post".
[bullshit from reading thread title]
Go read the goddamned thread. Jump to: