Topic: THEYMOS ITS ENOUGH !!!!!!!!! - page 4. (Read 1134 times)

Why answer any for a proven protector and support of a liar like suchmoon?

Lol look at him providing sensible discussion here NOT. As always his posts are mostly low functioning drivel or net negative caustic junk that seeks to protect and enable the status quo of system abusers both merit and trust. He often tries to sound smart but then just unravels under any real scrutiny to descend into screaming pure nonsense. Aggression is his only successful tactic but once you break him apart with facts and observable events you find there is nothing to worry about with that one.

He is proven untrustworthy now so there is no point to really pay him any heed.

I just see someone grasping at straws with no proof to substantiate his falseclaims. Weak sauce. 

We will see to it that the facts of his behaviour are known and not forgotten.

If we stick to the observable facts then we can not going wrong.

https://www.google.com/search?q=negativ+proofen+site:bitcointalk.org&nfpr=1

Tell us more how you "agree" with Thule.

You bitch know exectly why only alts are joining that discussion as history has proofen that any legit account got instantly crashed by your scamming group


Vod is another bitch who abused the system in favour of that scamming group.
Additionaly he is a dumb person.
Do i agree with Thule ?I would love to had seen Thule given him a lesson as Vod was completly wrong and trying to defand himself with poor
scare tactics.
I'm wondering he still haven't joined that thread.
Maybe the last confrontation made him use his brain a bit.

On a scale  of 1 to 10, how much do you love Vod?

1 being "I'm Thule"
10 being "I'm pretending I'm not Thule"

Here now we observe the double standards shit posting sock puppet trolling racist the pharmacist.

He is a proven shit posting troll using racist and offensive junk to spam his other sig for btc dust but come here to lecture and spout unsubstantiated and false junk himself about supposed trolling ...whilst spamming his sig lol

What a double standards corrupt person we can clearly observe he is and very untrustworthy indeed.

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.17808231

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/racism-is-allowed-5096914



i would suggest visiting that thread and then reviewing the evidence before leaving a comment to relate your thoughts on the entire debacle

Oh, but he said this:

Yeah, I peeked.  Last time.  This level of trolling is getting ridiculous--it's the same thing over and over, and the only people who give these morons any support are alt accounts.  It's polluting Meta and Reputation and creating more drama amidst all the inherent drama involved with the major adjustment in the trust system.  Is anyone moderating Meta?  TMAN's local rule in his last thread really ought to have been enforced instead of letting the trolls run rampant.

Fucking grow up.

False statement. I have no alts here.

Again this is what you get from these system abusers.

I provide facts based proof and these bozos present some nonsense they make up with no support evidence AT ALL

Suchmoron has no clue how to debate, no clue on how to substantiate any of his bogus claims at all. He feels there is no need.

I can prove he is supporting a proven liar.

Can he prove I have any alts ?? no he can not.

He is untrustworthy the facts speak for themselves.

They will sink to any underhanded tactics to discredit those that oppose their collusion and untrustworthy behaviour. Therefore they are untrustworthy.

The same goes for DT who refuse to review and report back on facts and observable events that demonstrate untrustworthy behaviour from DT members and or merit sources.

THEYMOS I WOULD LIKE TO ASK YOU TO CHECK MY ACCOUNT SO YOU CAN CHECK YOURSELF I'M NOT THULE AND TO TAKE ACTION AGAINST THE FALSE NEGATIV FEEDBACK WHICH IS MARKING ME AS SCAMMER ON THE WHOLE BOARD.
IF YOU CONSIDER GIVING FALSE NEGATIV FEEDBACKS BY DT MEMBERS WHO ADMIT THEY HAVE NO HARD LEGIT PROOF BUT ONLY A POOR ASSUMPTION IT MEANS YOU ACTIVLY ALLOW TO ABUSE THAT SYSTEM ON INNOCENT MEMBERS AND YOU ARE THE PROBLEM

It's good enough proof for me. I'm not asking anyone else to post negative feedback for you.

On the other hand, if someone expects me to take action - yes, I would demand proof that is satisfactory to me.


That's cryptohunter's alt in case you didn't know.

Why are you typing so cryptically?

I don't mind it if you do wordplay. ^{($0.xx is pretty funny)}
Just wondering, though.

---

^{C o}_bⁿ_u^g_d^r_d^a_y^t_.^s

You just proofed you have no evidence and just made a negativ feedback based on your poor assumption.
You defamed me without having any proof.
Thats the best example how you defame legit members on that forum and defend your buddies demanding hard proof.


@THEYMOS YOU DON'T CALL THIS ABUSE OF A DT MEMBER DEFAMING ME AS THULE WITHOUT PROOF ?

NOW WHAT I'M BEING TAGGED AS SCAMMER ON THIS FORUM BECAUSE OF AN ASSUMPTION WITHOUT PROOF ?
FIRST I WAS CRYPTOHUNTER NOW THULE.
WOULD I LOGIN WITH MY LEGANDARY I GUESS I WILL BE TAGGED FOR BEING AN ALT OF QS

If you are not a liar and untrustworthy perhaps you should not be supporting one ?

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.49339800

If you're not an alt of Thule then perhaps you shouldn't be impersonating him so well.

ch have more satoshis than exist accounts
me 2

I know it was mentioned many times thats why i made fun he wouldn't need based on your claims.

Also suchmoon you are a pathetic moron.
You just demanded 5 minutes ago from somebody clear proof of merit abuse where everyone can see it.
You said clearly without clear proof there is no evidence.

And here you come with your negativ feedback abuse

Please show me the clear proof me being alt of thule.
I will ask theymos to check my account to proof i'm not him and to hold you fully accountable
for your abuse and try to defame me with false claims.

Proof?  do you think you should bring unsubstantiated claims ? I mean as a campaign manager? That is a seriously fragile position. If QS or anyone else started to spread unsubstantiated rumours about yourself to say new projects or their investors that put you in an untrustworthy light it could reflect on their project.

I mean think of it like this... If i found out a campaign manager was later demonstrated to spread unsubstantiated claims to discredit another user who was trying to post accurate facts and observable events that demonstrated untrustworthy behaviour then that campaign could by those actions be reasoned to be untrustworthy. I mean if he pokes his nose in seemingly to defend proven liars, system abusers and even sock puppet sig spammers then that does not look good at all.

Do you have some evidence of this or just spreading this kind of stuff for fun?

I am not saying if he does or does not.

Can you present your facts here please. So that I can analyse and locate these sock puppets he is using that you know of.

Seems ironic considering the^rm_os excluded me for being too loose with my tags against merit abuse.
¯\_(ツ)_/¯

tis is a dissapointment for me too but theymos did just dt1 exclude tman and actmyname

QS has more accounts then you have satoshis

I have clearly demonstrated with observable events and facts that this current system is broken and infested with

1. liars
2. racist sock puppet sig spamming greedy paid2post addicts
3. trust abusers
4. weak and complicit users who will not stand against proven abusers and liars.
5. That merit is clearly cycled and abused and that now for some reason the ones obviously cycling it are the key positions for the trust system. LOL  just check bpip for each user and then look a their fans and receiver look at their ganging up on posts and then look who included and exclude who on DT lists. It is quite ridiculous.


Now they try to bring forth some censorship if all of that is not enough to prevent relevant, on topic facts and observable events being presented in meta if it does not fit with their agenda. I see sounds legit.

there is a need for a facts based objective trust system and a union to stand against corrupt and broken system controllers.

I suggest locating and listing their abuses (clear abuses) and then we will make a list of the DT members that have demonstrated untrustworthy behaviour in clear black and white. Over time the more they abuse and we can present facts and observable instances of this abuse then we can discredit them and rightly so.

I mean not everyone knows everything that has taken place on this board.

I was not aware until someone told me recently that the pharmacist was using a sock puppet Huge Black Woman to generate racist and offensive to some trolling to spam his other sig for btc dust.  To me that is untrustworthy. To see him lecturing on trolling or racist stuff or sig spamming is completely sickening.

I mean not to mention having such a greedy person as a system controller in both systems of control for paid2post and trading is quite insulting to the board.