Pages:
Author

Topic: theymos why remove the red tag from Lauda? - page 2. (Read 767 times)

legendary
Activity: 2674
Merit: 2965
Terminated.
Did he get hacked? What the fuck is happening?

I thought trust wasn't moderated, this is some weird deep shit. I regret being a DT1 member from day one fuck this.
I assume one of the following two:
1) There's been a legal case where theymos was silently beaten - or he is afraid of this.
2) He's gone crazy-liberal and wants to see existing scammers walk as there is no way for all current DT members to go through all ratings that were ever given out in any reasonable time.

1. Is my bet.

Maybe you ought to slowly-introduce a system next time, i.e. first deploy the rules and then make it go in effect. Several people followed into that flag, whilst misunderstanding the implications that it has. The flag can't be deleted or changed in any way, so I had to advise people to create a flag-type-1.
This was the cause of this issue. Furthermore, he should be focusing on resolving open questions while scammers are free and not on going after some Queen-cat.
member
Activity: 270
Merit: 17
Lauda made an affirmation that was untrue. Why would anyone believe what Lauda says in the future if he is willing to knowingly and intentionally affirm (promise to be true) some untrue?

Lauda left retalitory feedback on theymos too and since removed it.
legendary
Activity: 3276
Merit: 2442
Some super weird shit is happening with theymos.

He asked me to remove lauda from my trust list, and not just that, told me to distrust her. He says BSV is scam but they need to break a contract to to be able identified as a scam.

I replied to him "If it is a scam, it doesn't need a broken contract. Please start to make sense dude. I am taking lauda to my trust list now."

Did he get hacked? What the fuck is happening?

I thought trust wasn't moderated, this is some weird deep shit. I regret being a DT1 member from day one fuck this.
copper member
Activity: 2870
Merit: 2298
Lauda made an affirmation that was untrue. Why would anyone believe what Lauda says in the future if he is willing to knowingly and intentionally affirm (promise to be true) some untrue?
legendary
Activity: 3556
Merit: 9709
#1 VIP Crypto Casino
Lauda completely lied and broke your own rule for falsely flagging so you RED negged him and then remove it???


Why? This user needs to be removed from DT
Lauda was removed from DT1 according to Bpip

https://bpip.org/default.aspx



Lauda wasn’t removed from DT1 in the sense of actively being removed. He was rotated out due to the monthly changes, suchmoon was too.

There are only 100 DT1 members permitted per month. People who qualify will rotate in & out occasionally.
member
Activity: 270
Merit: 17
He withdrew the accusation.

I'm still pretty annoyed about it, though. I mean, he checked a box which said:
Quote
On my honor, I affirm the following: 1) This user [Quickseller] violated a written contract [with me], resulting in damages; 2) I have not been made whole by the user; 3) no existing flag covers this same incident; 4) this incident is accurately and completely described in the above topic; 5) the incident occurred roughly in the month given above [Sep 2015]. Furthermore, I promise to withdraw my support for this flag if this user makes me whole in the future.
Which has several blatantly-false statements.

Thank you for responding
legendary
Activity: 2674
Merit: 2965
Terminated.
I had to remove mine too then:
He withdrew the accusation.

I'm still pretty annoyed about it, though. I mean, he checked a box which said:
Quote
On my honor, I affirm the following: 1) This user [Quickseller] violated a written contract [with me], resulting in damages; 2) I have not been made whole by the user; 3) no existing flag covers this same incident; 4) this incident is accurately and completely described in the above topic; 5) the incident occurred roughly in the month given above [Sep 2015]. Furthermore, I promise to withdraw my support for this flag if this user makes me whole in the future.
Which has several blatantly-false statements.
Maybe you ought to slowly-introduce a system next time, i.e. first deploy the rules and then make it go in effect. Several people followed into that flag, whilst misunderstanding the implications that it has. The flag can't be deleted or changed in any way, so I had to advise people to create a flag-type-1.
administrator
Activity: 5222
Merit: 13032
He withdrew the accusation.

I'm still pretty annoyed about it, though. I mean, he checked a box which said:
Quote
On my honor, I affirm the following: 1) This user [Quickseller] violated a written contract [with me], resulting in damages; 2) I have not been made whole by the user; 3) no existing flag covers this same incident; 4) this incident is accurately and completely described in the above topic; 5) the incident occurred roughly in the month given above [Sep 2015]. Furthermore, I promise to withdraw my support for this flag if this user makes me whole in the future.
Which has several blatantly-false statements.
legendary
Activity: 3626
Merit: 4440
Lauda completely lied and broke your own rule for falsely flagging so you RED negged him and then remove it???


Why? This user needs to be removed from DT
Lauda was removed from DT1 according to Bpip

https://bpip.org/default.aspx

member
Activity: 270
Merit: 17
This has literally nothing to do with you. You haven’t been contacted by anybody about it, stay in your lane, bitch.



Stay on topic it's a valid question....Bitch
legendary
Activity: 3556
Merit: 9709
#1 VIP Crypto Casino
This has literally nothing to do with you. You haven’t been contacted by anybody about it, stay in your lane, bitch.

member
Activity: 270
Merit: 17
Lauda completely lied and broke your own rule for falsely flagging so you RED negged him and then remove it???


Why? This user needs to be removed from DT
Pages:
Jump to: