I am curious enough if it's okay with Telegram to use their project that suspended? For sure, these groups of developers has authorized by Telegram. The difficulty here is what if, these groups of developers are also connected with Telegram? Do they just want to cut the connection of Telegram to the TON cryptocurrency?
Read more about the issue here: Telegram Drops TON Cryptocurrency Project After US Prohibits Global Distribution
Topic: Third party will launch TON - page 2. (Read 287 times)
Telegram finally announced to stop its TON and Gram initiative. The firm has abandoned the project as SEC imposed regulatory restrictions. However, an independent group of developers has stated that they would work to create a Free TON network. But will Third-party project be safe?
The question is will Telegram allow this third party to created a supposedly Free TON network? Can you post the link as well as where you get the news that there are group of developers interested about creating it? Maybe this supposedly third party as somewhat related to Telegram themselves, or possible that Telegram hired them to create for them so that they can deflect the attention the getting from the US authorities.
Who is the third party? Was it part of the TON team or community before this project is stopped by Telegram?
TON has become a hot discussion currently because this is a big project that many people are waiting for. Unfortunately, Telegram gives up and stopped this blockchain project. Consequently, many investors are disappointed with this.
If the plan of the third party will save and create Free TON, will it be the same as the basic purpose of the TON by Telegram? Or will it be different?
I do not know about the third party so that it is difficult to say that it will be safe or not. if we know who they are and what is the relation to the TON, we may need to search it more and believe in this.
TON has become a hot discussion currently because this is a big project that many people are waiting for. Unfortunately, Telegram gives up and stopped this blockchain project. Consequently, many investors are disappointed with this.
If the plan of the third party will save and create Free TON, will it be the same as the basic purpose of the TON by Telegram? Or will it be different?
I do not know about the third party so that it is difficult to say that it will be safe or not. if we know who they are and what is the relation to the TON, we may need to search it more and believe in this.
It could be the strategy or new move from the same telegram team or developers, i think now they will launch this project anonymously and register it at some small country or place as an offshore company so that they can get rid of the SEC jurisdiction, i think project should continue and i will support this move from the developers.
Is it possible to move the projects somewhere else and not deal with SEC? Why would even Durov decided to make it ob the US territory? He obviously knew there will be lots of problems.
And who will fund these third parties? Does Durov intends to raise another sum for them or what?
We know that the US market share is very attractive to investors, maybe that is a consideration, but the fact that is not in line with the SEC has stopped the Durov project
I read and found this
TON Labs chief technology officer Mitya Goroshevsky.
Quote
Ton Labs, launched their own version of the TON blockchain — effectively a hard fork — dubbed Free TON. The startup is not officially associated with Telegram or the original TON, but it did previously run TON’s test network. Ton Labs its goal is to make the network available to the public without waiting for Telegram to pass regulatory obstacles, specifically those with the SEC.
Source: https://www.okex.com/academy/en/telegrams-ton-is-over-the-full-saga-behind-the-failed-blockchain-project
Telegram finally announced to stop its TON and Gram initiative. The firm has abandoned the project as SEC imposed regulatory restrictions. However, an independent group of developers has stated that they would work to create a Free TON network. But will Third-party project be safe?
Telegram team has insisted on this for a very long time. However, it was obvious that TON would come to this point after the SEC intervention. Instead of insisting on this, it would be appropriate for them to support a different network. Thus, they would have had the chance to complete what they thought and both got rid of legal restrictions.
As a result, as mentioned in the topic, independent developers can try to implement their ideas. We will see the issue of safety when everything comes up. However, it should not be expected that the upcoming project will catch the same hype as the idea that Telegram offers.
Too bad they are in the United States and dealing with the SEC, many projects have problems there,
it's better not to participate in the TON, because it is very risky
it's better not to participate in the TON, because it is very risky
Is it possible to move the projects somewhere else and not deal with SEC? Why would even Durov decided to make it ob the US territory? He obviously knew there will be lots of problems.
And who will fund these third parties? Does Durov intends to raise another sum for them or what?
actually it is a good step they keep trying to revive this project, it's just a bit risky, especially as far as I am TON has no affiliation with Telegram anymore and because of that I became doubtful about their decision.
Too bad they are in the United States and dealing with the SEC, many projects have problems there,
it's better not to participate in the TON, because it is very risky
it's better not to participate in the TON, because it is very risky
It doesn't matter at all, the TON network will be absolutely useless and valueless if Telegram is not behind the project and Gram, or whatever coin or token they create, can't be used on Telegram.
I wonder why you call them "Third-party".
I guess they are part of the centralized telegram community that participated in crowdfunding and development of crypto-based telegram. Maybe they decided to let the typical government regulate the centralized telegram while they focus on building a fully decentralized one that will be free from centralized regulation?
I guess they are part of the centralized telegram community that participated in crowdfunding and development of crypto-based telegram. Maybe they decided to let the typical government regulate the centralized telegram while they focus on building a fully decentralized one that will be free from centralized regulation?
As long as the code can be audited before it will be massively used by public and we can sure if that TON free blockchain will be a safe blockchain to be used by everyone.
We need a trusted party to audit the code at least some people who expert on it.
We need a trusted party to audit the code at least some people who expert on it.
Telegram finally announced to stop its TON and Gram initiative. The firm has abandoned the project as SEC imposed regulatory restrictions. However, an independent group of developers has stated that they would work to create a Free TON network. But will Third-party project be safe?
Jump to: