I have yet to find a coherent argument for preventing the increase of block sizes and the resistance to doing so seems to be causing more problems then those of us who recognize the necessity of doing so. It is you who are creating the split in Bitcoin, not those who wish to increase the block size.
Present a coherent and logical argument or GTFO.
It appears to me that the data presented (name, employer, vote) is a very strong argument about motives.
It would be rather incredible if the correlation between people drawing paychecks from Blockstream and people in favor of no maximum block size increase were a coincidence.
Hmmm, Blockstream intends to set up a transaction processing network to mediate people's transactions and use the bitcoin block chain for a settlement network only. A plan which won't work all that well if people can just use the block chain themselves. How could people be prevented from just using the block chain themselves? Hmmmmmm......
Conflict of interest much? Nawww, couldn't be. But isn't it weird how the every last dev who sees an increase in the maximum block size as a good thing is NOT getting paychecks from Blockstream?
