This is very bad... | Bitcointalksearch.org

nster

full member

Activity: 126

Merit: 100

Quote from: em3rgentOrdr on March 29, 2011, 04:39:30 AM

Quote from: CCCMikey on March 29, 2011, 04:36:11 AM

Unless it could run a GPU miner it wouldn't be worth the effort

And the people who have really good GPUs usually know what they're doing with their computers I think? Wouldn't they notice the extra heat and noise?

Hard to say. There are a lot of ignorant consumers out there who have no idea what's inside their computer. A lot of people have really fancy cpus and graphics cards, but are totally unaware of it and then only use their computer to browse the internet...

Some people think they have to best gaming computer in the world because they paid 3500$ for it. turns out it has a 5750 and a 980X :p

em3rgentOrdr

sr. member

Activity: 434

Merit: 252

youtube.com/ericfontainejazz now accepts bitcoin

Quote from: CCCMikey on March 29, 2011, 04:36:11 AM

Unless it could run a GPU miner it wouldn't be worth the effort

And the people who have really good GPUs usually know what they're doing with their computers I think? Wouldn't they notice the extra heat and noise?

Hard to say. There are a lot of ignorant consumers out there who have no idea what's inside their computer. A lot of people have really fancy cpus and graphics cards, but are totally unaware of it and then only use their computer to browse the internet...

CCCMikey

member

Activity: 77

Merit: 10

Unless it could run a GPU miner it wouldn't be worth the effort

And the people who have really good GPUs usually know what they're doing with their computers I think? Wouldn't they notice the extra heat and noise?

em3rgentOrdr

sr. member

Activity: 434

Merit: 252

youtube.com/ericfontainejazz now accepts bitcoin

I'm afraid that eventually someone will write a bitcoin virus. It basically infects your computer, runs bitcoin miner, and sends any proceeds to the virus creator. I don't want to give anyone ideas, though Sad

, but at least it would strengthen the network

.

caveden

legendary

Activity: 1106

Merit: 1004

Quote from: Jered Kenna (TradeHill) on March 28, 2011, 07:33:20 PM

Sirius pays for hosting and all that? Should we donate some for the SSL cert or is the money not really an issue?

That's a question I've been asking. Who pays for this site?
There are no ads, no donation link, nothing. Somebody's contributing out of his own pocket...

Ricochet

sr. member

Activity: 373

Merit: 250

Quote from: theymos on March 28, 2011, 03:34:42 PM

HTTPS isn't the default. No one should be ending up there unless they already know what they're doing.

I've seen multiple people link to the HTTPS versions, so whenever I happen to click on that I get the Firefox warning.

Jered Kenna (TradeHill)

sr. member

Activity: 420

Merit: 250

Quote from: Gavin Andresen on March 28, 2011, 07:28:08 PM

Quote from: kiba on March 28, 2011, 07:23:50 PM

Sirius runs the website.

... and we're looking for volunteers. See https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/bitcoinorg-server-admins-wanted-5052

Quick "why no proper SSL cert" : because it never made it near the top of anybody's TODO list. The task is:
+ Figure out where the bitcoin.org domain is registered and make sure the MX records/etc are pointing somewhere so verification emails from the certificate authority don't get lost.
+ buy the cert and jump through the 'verify you are who you say you are' hoops.
+ replace the self-signed cert on the web server

Sirius pays for hosting and all that? Should we donate some for the SSL cert or is the money not really an issue?

Gavin Andresen

legendary

Activity: 1652

Merit: 2301

Chief Scientist

Quote from: kiba on March 28, 2011, 07:23:50 PM

Sirius runs the website.

... and we're looking for volunteers. See https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/bitcoinorg-server-admins-wanted-5052

Quick "why no proper SSL cert" : because it never made it near the top of anybody's TODO list. The task is:
+ Figure out where the bitcoin.org domain is registered and make sure the MX records/etc are pointing somewhere so verification emails from the certificate authority don't get lost.
+ buy the cert and jump through the 'verify you are who you say you are' hoops.
+ replace the self-signed cert on the web server

kiba

legendary

Activity: 980

Merit: 1020

Sirius runs the website.

CCCMikey

member

Activity: 77

Merit: 10

Who owns / runs the bitcoin.org website anyway? Would they be hiding for some reason?

Jered Kenna (TradeHill)

sr. member

Activity: 420

Merit: 250

Quote from: spenvo on March 28, 2011, 07:07:12 PM

@ryepdx - The $120 figure came as I remembered having to purchase one on the cheap about a year ago.

Heh, so Godaddy's (I know shoot me now) SSLs start at $49 - $99 - https://www.godaddy.com/ssl/ssl-certificates.aspx

And trust me Vlad, back when I was working with OpenBSD - I too signed my own SSLs because who wants to pay... So long as the average user never gets directed to https and hit with that warning, I guess it's OK. ? Undecided

If $49 can take care of it then why not?

If bitcoin.org gets a lot more hits then I'm going to assume you'll get a lot going to HTTPS of course if it gets to the point it's really a concern $49 will be less significant than now.

spenvo

member

Activity: 81

Merit: 10

@ryepdx - The $120 figure came as I remembered having to purchase one on the cheap about a year ago.

Heh, so Godaddy's (I know shoot me now) SSLs start at $49 - $99 - https://www.godaddy.com/ssl/ssl-certificates.aspx

And trust me Vlad, back when I was working with OpenBSD - I too signed my own SSLs because who wants to pay... So long as the average user never gets directed to https and hit with that warning, I guess it's OK. ? Undecided

nster

full member

Activity: 126

Merit: 100

Quote from: ryepdx on March 28, 2011, 05:02:27 PM

I'll pitch in some money to get our certificate signed. It really doesn't look good if every browser that stumbles across our https address flashes warnings at the user.

Quote from: nster on March 28, 2011, 03:28:15 PM

this is a 5 MILLION $ economy, if we are stupid enough to not pay 120$ to potential do A LOT of good to bitcoins, well....

Where'd you get the $120 figure? I just did a quick check and saw that VeriSign's cheapest option is $399 a year.

spento said that but wtv, 400$ isn't much in a 5M$ economy that is growing

I mean, about a dollar a day XD

ryepdx

hero member

Activity: 714

Merit: 500

I'll pitch in some money to get our certificate signed. It really doesn't look good if every browser that stumbles across our https address flashes warnings at the user.

Quote from: nster on March 28, 2011, 03:28:15 PM

this is a 5 MILLION $ economy, if we are stupid enough to not pay 120$ to potential do A LOT of good to bitcoins, well....

Where'd you get the $120 figure? I just did a quick check and saw that VeriSign's cheapest option is $399 a year.

casascius

vip

Activity: 1386

Merit: 1140

The Casascius 1oz 10BTC Silver Round (w/ Gold B)

Quote from: theymos on March 28, 2011, 03:34:42 PM

HTTPS isn't the default. No one should be ending up there unless they already know what they're doing.

If no one should be ending up there, how come everybody knows this is a problem?

I have been griping about this for MONTHS. I have already pledged BTC for the purchase of the certificate. The "people should just trust the self-signed certificate" and "CA's are just fronts for the FBI and give your private key to the feds" myths have been debunked repeatedly. When oh when can we just get this fixed?

Jered Kenna (TradeHill)

sr. member

Activity: 420

Merit: 250

I agree 100% about not underestimating the average person's lack of computer knowledge and ability to freak out if their browser says it's bad. We see a lot of this as simple but even the least knowledgeable person on these forums is way above average.
Think about the type of people who use their CD tray for a cup holder when you're trying to decide if they'll get scared not if they know how SSL works.

spenvo

member

Activity: 81

Merit: 10

@Theymos - You're right, bitcoin.org does not point to https by default.

When I first learned about Bitcoin a couple of months ago, it was pointing to https for some reason and Chrome had it's warning/block all up in my face. That was my first impression of Bitcoin Undecided

bitcoinex

sr. member

Activity: 350

Merit: 252

probiwon.com

NOD32 detects new heur_pe in Bitcoin

Anybody can check this issue for new bitcoin versions?

And about SSL

Atlas

Activity: -

Merit: -

Well, the slower the Bitcoin economy grows, the better. I still need time to purchase more Bitcoins.

theymos

administrator

Activity: 5222

Merit: 13032

HTTPS isn't the default. No one should be ending up there unless they already know what they're doing.

Topic: This is very bad... (Read 6770 times)