Pages:
Author

Topic: This Prank Proved That Americans Don’t Read Past Headlines - page 2. (Read 1194 times)

sr. member
Activity: 476
Merit: 252
If you don´t read you probably settle for talking heads on TV with 30-second analyses of extremely complex issues. Definitely helps psychopaths getting voted into power.

Yeah and helps people to be satisfied by those psychopats...

And you finish in the movie Idiocracy! No one able to think in any way!
hero member
Activity: 616
Merit: 500
If you don´t read you probably settle for talking heads on TV with 30-second analyses of extremely complex issues. Definitely helps psychopaths getting voted into power.
full member
Activity: 140
Merit: 100
I read, and write and have time for that, instead of loosing it on social networks and who don't like should not read it..it's simply..don't like to read long paragraphs you don't need to read it...it's free choice
hero member
Activity: 826
Merit: 500
Join @Bountycloud for the best bounties!
People now have less time to read and in fact they don't want read..when is news they look only on internet main headlines without click on link to read all article..not to mention books..with fb and other networks simply people are nervous and don't have patience to read

What is incredible is that they may not have the time to read, but they have the time to write a super long paragraph! ^^
member
Activity: 98
Merit: 10
★YoBit.Net★ 350+ Coins Exchange & Dice
Choosing not to click on the link to this story due to potential unknown factors, this is not laziness and I do realize the context is different.
Could it be argued that Americans are more prevalent on the internet? Therefore leading the issue in people not reading full articles. Seems like a easy pile on.
full member
Activity: 140
Merit: 100
People now have less time to read and in fact they don't want read..when is news they look only on internet main headlines without click on link to read all article..not to mention books..with fb and other networks simply people are nervous and don't have patience to read
hero member
Activity: 826
Merit: 500
Join @Bountycloud for the best bounties!
This is... Incredible xD

I mean, I don't always answer after reading every link and source yeah it happens! But I at least read the article and most of the time I try to take the time to read the important links/sources mentioned.

This is really hard, especially if 80% of population is concerned as they suggest.
hero member
Activity: 616
Merit: 500
God Hrmm...I guess everyone IS doing it, and it saves you from having to tap your finger (exhausting!) and from having to read words or think.

The problem is that the entire social media world literally revolves around what people click and read. This is why I rarely do Ask God anymore. Not enough people click to read it, so very few fans ever see the link, because FB is stupid.

https://www.facebook.com/TheGoodLordAbove/


legendary
Activity: 1540
Merit: 1000
That's fantastic Cheesy ..... Yeah, It is sad though that it's become such a problem.
hero member
Activity: 616
Merit: 500
This Prank Proved That Americans Don’t Read Past Headlines

By WakingTimes September 29, 2015

http://www.wakingtimes.com/2015/09/29/this-prank-proved-that-americans-dont-read-past-headlines/

Heather Callaghan, Contributor
Waking Times

But it may have proven more…

A social media April Fool’s prank spearheaded by NPR in 2014 is – ironically – drawing some reflection. This isn’t one of those frustrating social media psychology tests without the users’ knowledge. It appears to have been a lighthearted joke and a thank you to readers.

NPR posed a question with a link:

Why Doesn’t America Read Anymore?

According to writer Jay Hathaway, commenters squawked:

We totally do, NPR. Shut up. We read all the time. We’re reading your article right now!

Which only proved that they didn’t.

Had they actually gone to the link on the NPR website they wouldn’t have seen a story, but would have seen this message:

npr-social-media-prank

“If you are reading this, please like this post and do not comment on it,” it says.

But the social media post was heavily weighted with response-baggage, many of them paragraphs long, chiding NPR and defending their book diet trying to ward off perceived disapproval. But they didn’t read the “article,” did they? Some circles suggest that only 2 out of 10 people will read past the headline.

Even though it was all in good humor, it actually unwittingly proved a few points – both in the positive and something-to-think-about categories.


 
Writers already know people do this – it’s the frustration they feel when they visit their story’s post to see if there are discussions, only to see mile-long arguments based on a faulty presumption of the headline. They know the person hasn’t read the article before deciding a belief and that headlines invite rock-throwing. That seems to be par for the Internet course.

But even worse…

Is to see people sharing something as though it’s the gospel, commenting on it and calling for action – when you can clearly gather it’s a completely fabricated satirical headline. Unlike NPR, the satire sites and the malicious, fake websites are not making sure people finally get that it was a joke.  I’ve commented on threads about sources in hopes that the 12,000 people I saw share faulty posts did not throw literal rocks at the groups of people targeted in them. That is to say, please don’t believe the fake church sign that suggests Muslim Americans are about to jihad everyone in the U.S. For starters, have you ever seen a mosque sign?

islamicagenda
That same RV shows up behind every church sign – must be one of those “coexist” families.
Yet, there is no shortage of amazing information; and, unfortunately, the nature of the beast requires that catchy headlines be chosen unless the writer was the Stephen King of article authors and just the name could encourage a click. It’s hard for any writer or site to vie for attention. Even then, people often don’t read past the headlines.

This fact merely shows that people have limited amounts of time in their day and there’s nothing wrong with that. The NPR prank might show that people want approval and they want to argue before they know what’s what, but it also highlights that people simply feel crunched for time.

And this is a problem…

IdiocracyIt’s time to prioritize our lives if we want to take information to the next level. It’s hard to delve deeper into understanding when time for reading is spread throughout the day over a phone. Wisdom would require understanding to permeate all areas of our lives. This is difficult but it requires “batching” your time, like what would be effective at work.

Studies overwhelmingly show that multitasking is seriously unhealthy. Yet, we are compelled more and more to engage that way – is this making us more disengaged at life?

Reductionism

Lastly, are we being compelled only to accept communication in memes, bytes, blips, drips and drabs? Is Idiocracy happening before our eyes?

“Unaware of what year it was, Joe wandered the streets desperate for help. But the English language had deteriorated into a hybrid of hillbilly, valleygirl, inner-city slang and various grunts. Joe was able to understand them, but when he spoke in an ordinary voice he sounded pompous and…”

If so, we’d be better off taking some time to have deeper discussions or time alone to reflect. It’s impossible to ban together for better changes if we cannot even communicate ideas.

Sensory Overload

It might time to take charge of our online reading and harness our time, making sure to reconnect with your spirit, family and nature.

http://www.wakingtimes.com/2015/09/29/this-prank-proved-that-americans-dont-read-past-headlines/
Pages:
Jump to: