THIS SHOULD BE STOPPED ONCE AGAIN. - page 4.

cryptoatomic

member

Activity: 168

Merit: 12

Oh really do you expect me to kiss his ass so that my reds would be removed? i got my balls back
look at the bigger picture here,red tagged accounts based on their usernames is clearly bullishit

He once again proved that his mental capability isnt suitable for being a DT member,he should be excluded now.
red trust based on their useranmes??? Grin

thats cool good job.

He might want to remove those accounts farmers because his accounts couldnt enjoy the bounty campaigns.

The Sceptical Chymist

legendary

Activity: 3528

Merit: 7005

Top Crypto Casino

Quote from: actmyname on April 28, 2018, 05:21:33 AM

I actually do think that these ratings are unwarranted unless there's a suitable reference attached.

When I discovered an alt ring of users that have the prefix 'cripto' I was careful not to tag people who are innocent. There's always the chance of collision with identification via username thus I believe we should give the benefit of the doubt to anyone if there is no sufficient evidence.

I looked for hours at the posting clusters on the altcoin discussion section and the dates of registration for these accounts--and I have no doubt they're alts.

Funny how crypto[pussy/heroin/morphines/marijuana/atomic/devs/titan/crocs/mngr/spear/bobo/nero/prophecy/ux/tsunami/and others piped up within about 4 hours of me leaving the new feedbacks.

These accounts all have suspiciously similar posting styles as well, and their output is all shitposting. This guy is a huge spammer and the feedback is well deserved.

Edit: And interestingly, all of the accounts I tagged are in different bounties. There's no overlap whatsoever, as if the owner of the alts was deliberately trying not to register two accounts in the same bounty. I'd also like this guy to list which accounts are his and which are not.

cryptoatomic

member

Activity: 168

Merit: 12

This pussy is clearly fighthing the spams,i only have 8 alts accounts ,and those people who got reds from him based with the crypto is purely bullshit.
I REQUEST THIS ARSEHOLE to be removed he is getting worst,look at the posting styles which he tagged, shit posting all over the forum but not my accounts.

I wonder how did pharmacist included those pittyful accounts ,and tagged them as mine..it should be stopped,he should be moved for being a pussy.

mdayonliner

copper member

Activity: 630

Merit: 420

We are Bitcoin!

Quote from: cryptoatomic on April 28, 2018, 05:17:40 AM

idiot pharmacist giving red trust to the accounts which i didnt even know,unluckily having a username which has "crypto" is a crime!...

Why do people get too much upset and through things out of anger? Do you think showing rude attitude gonna resolve the issue (?)

Let's say The pharmacist MADE a mistake (for the sake of argue). Do you think throwing out these kind of statement is going to help to get a good reply from anyone. After all we are human. If you have problem with someone then why not be polite and explain.

Nothing is personal here. It's a forum mate. At-least we need to act gentle.

Edit:

Quote from: actmyname on April 28, 2018, 05:21:33 AM

I believe we should give the benefit of the doubt to anyone if there is no sufficient evidence.

True. It's really easy. Make a gentle decent conversation with the person, ask the reason of redTagged. Be logical¹ on why you are not guilty. Simple! Isn't it?

¹ Some example excuses

actmyname

copper member

Activity: 2562

Merit: 2510

Spear the bees

I actually do think that these ratings are unwarranted unless there's a suitable reference attached.

When I discovered an alt ring of users that have the prefix 'cripto' I was careful not to tag people who are innocent. There's always the chance of collision with identification via username thus I believe we should give the benefit of the doubt to anyone if there is no sufficient evidence.

cryptoatomic

member

Activity: 168

Merit: 12

idiot pharmacist giving red trust to the accounts which i didnt even know,unluckily having a username which has "crypto" is a crime!
he should be stopped by those people above him.

he should be excluded once again,i didnt even scam nor cheat in bounty campaigns.
spam? who doesnt do spam here? if theres someone should be removed here it should him!

dumbass! racist pussy is getting worst once again..I remembered when he first gave me his red trust,but luckily his pussy turned the table because he will be excluded last january but then after giving neutrals to the accounts he was removed,i am calling the attention of theymos or whom who can review his work,he is indeed going into the wrong path.

fighting spams? fuck me in the ass,you arent fighting spam instead you are pushing those people who receive your red trust to create more accounts..

this is not an accusation,this is a request so do not put this THREAD to reputation board which theymos wont see the big problem that this arsehole has created.

Topic: THIS SHOULD BE STOPPED ONCE AGAIN. - page 4. (Read 1343 times)