It was created by someone who knew the 1 rule of law, that will give you a good after life.
Treat others the way you would like to be treated.
Treat others the way you would like to be treated.
That is a belief, not a fact. I like facts.
Topic: Thou shall not steal - page 2. (Read 524 times)
That is a belief, not a fact. I like facts.
It was created by bankers, and they defined stealing at the same time. They also created the commandment "Thou shalt not commit adultery". The original meaning was that one should not have sex with adults outside wedlock.
legendary
Activity: 2408
Merit: 4282
eXch.cx - Automatic crypto Swap Exchange.
Hope you do know, it's more painful when you're poor and the things you can call yours get stolen. The rich can always make more wealth or buy more properties. To my understanding (from a biblical background) the law was made by someone who has the best interest of both the rich and poor at hand. The law "Thou shall not steal" is beneficiary to both parties (rich and poor).
To the poor, they avoid punishment by obeying the law while to the rich, it prevents greediness, assuming the poor that, the little they have won't be taken away from them and in general keeping the world at peace & balance.
To the poor, they avoid punishment by obeying the law while to the rich, it prevents greediness, assuming the poor that, the little they have won't be taken away from them and in general keeping the world at peace & balance.
... If you're talking (property) rights, richness and poverty are irrelevant concepts.
It is irrelevant if you have food on the table.
It was created by someone who knew the 1 rule of law, that will give you a good after life.
Treat others the way you would like to be treated.
Treat others the way you would like to be treated.
Not sure if they were poor or rich, but surely they were statists. Forbidding someone to steal does not automatically imply you're protecting someone else's right to property. No offence paxmao 
but I believe that discussion is more essential than the one about rich or poor. If you're talking (property) rights, richness and poverty are irrelevant concepts.
but I believe that discussion is more essential than the one about rich or poor. If you're talking (property) rights, richness and poverty are irrelevant concepts.
Possibly by rich because if they didn't made that commandment then poor people will steal money from rich and they will justify their action.
In your view, was this commandment created by someone poor or rich?
Jump to: