The Minister of Foreign Affairs of Argentina, Diana Mondino, recently confirmed that in Argentina you can make contracts paid in Bitcoin:
https://bitcoinmagazine.com/business/argentinas-minister-of-foreign-affairs-affirms-bitcoin-acceptance-for-contract-agreementsRecently, there was a story about a guy in Argentina who did just that to rent an apartment:
"A guy just signed a contract to rent an apartment using bitcoin, likely a world first"
Here is the original story, in Spanish:
https://www.pagina12.com.ar/703173-en-rosario-se-firmo-el-primer-contrato-de-alquiler-en-bitcoiThe first thing to consider is that the price in the contract is set in USDT, not even USD. The contract says 100 USDT, which is today the equivalent of $100. Here is the original in Spanish that mentions this:
Según consta en el contrato, el monto del alquiler será de la cantidad de bitcoins (BTC) equivalente a "100 Tether tokens USDT", una criptomoneda "estable" o stablecoin que cotiza 1 a 1 con el dólar. Es decir, 100 dólares, o 0,0021 BTC.
Now, first of all that sounds very cheap for a full month of rent, but the most interesting part to me is that the price was set in USDT, which can at any time depeg:
https://cointelegraph.com/news/how-and-why-do-stablecoins-depeg So, any month, those 100 USDT can represent a completely different amount of USD, which will then be converted to BTC.
The second thing to highlight here is that they are not paying the BTC directly to the other person wallet. They are using a centralized exchange called Fiwind, and basically they deposit their Argentinean Peso into the platform, exchange it to BTC, and then transfer the BTC in the platform to the landlord, monthly:
Así, el inquilino deberá, mensualmente, transferir los pesos argentinos "que estén en la cuenta bancaria o billetera virtual del usuario" a la plataforma Fiwind, y una vez allí convertirlos a la criptomoneda deseada (en este caso, Bitcoin). Luego, ese monto en criptomoneda será transferido al propietario en la misma plataforma, sin costo.
Apparently the centralized exchange is part of the contract, so maybe they are doing it this way to get all their fees from this person, and get some PR on the side.
It is a bit of a shame really, when they could have easily just paid directly from one person to another. The details of this story reveal that it's not really a direct peer to peer transfer, but a convoluted payment involving a third party. Might as well just pay it directly in Argentinean Pesos, or USD since they are setting it to $100 USD.
Missed opportunity. I think the main point here is setting the price in USD equivalent instead of the Argentinean Peso which devalues a lot over time.