Topic: Time to grow up. - page 2. (Read 4557 times)
He was fun while he tried
Ignored bulanula. Smartest thing I did all day.
However, deflationists pinged and poked me with so much effort and zeal that I will introduce deflationary influences in TBX (don't worry though, no subsidy cuts and no "demurrage" reaching into user's pocket)
Watch out for next TBX bounty
Watch out for next TBX bounty
TBX is pretty much dead by now. Litecoin is the next popular scamchain mate. Go with the flow LOL
*Yawn*
You're not even trying anymore, are you ?
Designing and implementing a completely new protocol takes some time, especially if it needs some major breakthroughs.
However, deflationists pinged and poked me with so much effort and zeal that I will introduce deflationary influences in TBX (don't worry though, no subsidy cuts and no "demurrage" reaching into user's pocket)
Watch out for next TBX bounty
Watch out for next TBX bounty
TBX is pretty much dead by now. Litecoin is the next popular scamchain mate. Go with the flow LOL
However, deflationists pinged and poked me with so much effort and zeal that I will introduce deflationary influences in TBX (don't worry though, no subsidy cuts and no "demurrage" reaching into user's pocket)
Watch out for next TBX bounty
Watch out for next TBX bounty
At least something we are in agreement with 
I like the "unfeasible economics" part a lot.
In b4 "zomgflation" argument ?
Also, for the love of Lukashenko, GG never had asymmetrical adjust (I haz Github to be my witness), y people no get fact straight ?
In b4 "zomgflation" argument ?
Also, for the love of Lukashenko, GG never had asymmetrical adjust (I haz Github to be my witness), y people no get fact straight ?
Well the question then is... did you cash out yet?
1.2.3.... chance over
So, I see you won't support your peculiar notion that economics are somehow infeasible ?
Well, sad.
This thread could use some pointless Aurstrian/Keynes clash (pointless because neither applies to exotic non-autonomous non-state economies fueled by a quasi-monetary system based upon infinitely divisible and re-nominable products eldritch mathematications)
Right a debate would be pretty pointless.
But my point is: The current Zeitgeist works against you...
Zeitgeist...that's bad
....
I mean, the movie was pretty terrible all around.
I like the "unfeasible economics" part a lot.
In b4 "zomgflation" argument ?
Also, for the love of Lukashenko, GG never had asymmetrical adjust (I haz Github to be my witness), y people no get fact straight ?
In b4 "zomgflation" argument ?
Also, for the love of Lukashenko, GG never had asymmetrical adjust (I haz Github to be my witness), y people no get fact straight ?
Well the question then is... did you cash out yet?
1.2.3.... chance over
So, I see you won't support your peculiar notion that economics are somehow infeasible ?
Well, sad.
This thread could use some pointless Aurstrian/Keynes clash (pointless because neither applies to exotic non-autonomous non-state economies fueled by a quasi-monetary system based upon infinitely divisible and re-nominable products eldritch mathematications)
Right a debate would be pretty pointless.
But my point is: The current Zeitgeist works against you...
I like the "unfeasible economics" part a lot.
In b4 "zomgflation" argument ?
Also, for the love of Lukashenko, GG never had asymmetrical adjust (I haz Github to be my witness), y people no get fact straight ?
In b4 "zomgflation" argument ?
Also, for the love of Lukashenko, GG never had asymmetrical adjust (I haz Github to be my witness), y people no get fact straight ?
Well the question then is... did you cash out yet?
1.2.3.... chance over
So, I see you won't support your peculiar notion that economics are somehow infeasible ?
Well, sad.
This thread could use some pointless Aurstrian/Keynesian clash (pointless because neither applies to exotic non-autonomous non-state economies fueled by a quasi-monetary system based upon infinitely divisible and re-nominable products eldritch mathematications)
I like the "unfeasible economics" part a lot.
In b4 "zomgflation" argument ?
Also, for the love of Lukashenko, GG never had asymmetrical adjust (I haz Github to be my witness), y people no get fact straight ?
In b4 "zomgflation" argument ?
Also, for the love of Lukashenko, GG never had asymmetrical adjust (I haz Github to be my witness), y people no get fact straight ?
Be careful. The party is watching ur internets comrade !
I like the "unfeasible economics" part a lot.
In b4 "zomgflation" argument ?
Also, for the love of Lukashenko, GG never had asymmetrical adjust (I haz Github to be my witness), y people no get fact straight ?
In b4 "zomgflation" argument ?
Also, for the love of Lukashenko, GG never had asymmetrical adjust (I haz Github to be my witness), y people no get fact straight ?
Well the question then is... did you cash out yet?
1.2.3.... chance over
There is absolutely no technical difference between litecoin and the various brixes. It is yet another opportunistic scam.
Well we can certainly say that people do not want a currency with an infinite supply. So it is just the next logical step of evolution. We"ll need to wait out what happens with it I don't think it is time yet to be successful, the little spark of innovation probably isn't enough but anyone claiming to know a reason why it will fail... I challenge them to provide a theory.
There is absolutely no technical difference between litecoin and the various brixes. It is yet another opportunistic scam.
Well said friend. Let's expose these damn scams.
I like the "unfeasible economics" part a lot.
In b4 "zomgflation" argument ?
Also, for the love of Lukashenko, GG never had asymmetrical adjust (I haz Github to be my witness), y people no get fact straight ?
In b4 "zomgflation" argument ?
Also, for the love of Lukashenko, GG never had asymmetrical adjust (I haz Github to be my witness), y people no get fact straight ?
There is absolutely no technical difference between litecoin and the various brixes. It is yet another opportunistic scam.
Well it it seems to be missing all the reasons I listed why the previous attempts of a alternate cryptocurrency have failed.
I wouldn't vouch for it's success but either it does or we can add an additional flaw to the list
I wouldn't vouch for it's success but either it does or we can add an additional flaw to the list
Well, its a evolution lets recap:
ixcoin - outright get quick rich scheme
i0coin - joke about the latter
solidcoin - revised get quick rich scheme with viral pr campain
then the big collapse of them people realized there has to be more to gain acceptance so another method was devised
original geistgeld - experiment which revealed the technical infeasibility of asymmetrical difficulty adjustment
relaunched geistgeld - patched version of the above, author decided to get a bunch for free -> fail
brixes - first point of actual innovation but the author still decided to get some, unfeasible economics
fairbrix - fail due to unfeasible economics
outlook:
solidcoin 2 - will fail due to the fact that people watched !five! failed attempts by the authors to get rich, they all been there and done that.
litecoin - the most promising candidate yet
ixcoin - outright get quick rich scheme
i0coin - joke about the latter
solidcoin - revised get quick rich scheme with viral pr campain
then the big collapse of them people realized there has to be more to gain acceptance so another method was devised
original geistgeld - experiment which revealed the technical infeasibility of asymmetrical difficulty adjustment
relaunched geistgeld - patched version of the above, author decided to get a bunch for free -> fail
brixes - first point of actual innovation but the author still decided to get some, unfeasible economics
fairbrix - fail due to unfeasible economics
outlook:
solidcoin 2 - will fail due to the fact that people watched !five! failed attempts by the authors to get rich, they all been there and done that.
litecoin - the most promising candidate yet
Why !? Care to explain please.
Well, its a evolution lets recap:
ixcoin - outright get quick rich scheme
i0coin - joke about the latter
solidcoin - revised get quick rich scheme with viral pr campain
then the big collapse of them people realized there has to be more to gain acceptance so another method was devised
original geistgeld - experiment which revealed the technical infeasibility of asymmetrical difficulty adjustment
relaunched geistgeld - patched version of the above, author decided to get a bunch for free -> fail
brixes - first point of actual innovation but the author still decided to get some, unfeasible economics
fairbrix - fail due to unfeasible economics
outlook:
solidcoin 2 - will fail due to the fact that people watched !five! failed attempts by the authors to get rich, they all been there and done that.
litecoin - the most promising candidate yet
ixcoin - outright get quick rich scheme
i0coin - joke about the latter
solidcoin - revised get quick rich scheme with viral pr campain
then the big collapse of them people realized there has to be more to gain acceptance so another method was devised
original geistgeld - experiment which revealed the technical infeasibility of asymmetrical difficulty adjustment
relaunched geistgeld - patched version of the above, author decided to get a bunch for free -> fail
brixes - first point of actual innovation but the author still decided to get some, unfeasible economics
fairbrix - fail due to unfeasible economics
outlook:
solidcoin 2 - will fail due to the fact that people watched !five! failed attempts by the authors to get rich, they all been there and done that.
litecoin - the most promising candidate yet
All altchains seen so far (except namecoin) should have no valuation, based on any rational economic analysis.
I don't want to start a pointless flamewar, but could you plese answer my question:What does "rational economic analysis" say about the existence of the city of Las Vegas,Nevada,USA?
1) The City of Lost Wages should be a small, dusty hamlet.
2) There's more than one definition of "rational".
3) Something else, please explain.
Thank you very much.
People with excess income use it for entertainment? Las Vegas does not refute rational economics. Shit, look at bitcoin; everyone wants to get rich without working for it.
All altchains seen so far (except namecoin) should have no valuation, based on any rational economic analysis.
I don't want to start a pointless flamewar, but could you plese answer my question:What does "rational economic analysis" say about the existence of the city of Las Vegas,Nevada,USA?
1) The City of Lost Wages should be a small, dusty hamlet.
2) There's more than one definition of "rational".
3) Something else, please explain.
Thank you very much.
Jump to: