Topic: @Timelord2067 (Read 1329 times)

You'd be best posting in the [url=https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2544574.0]Known Alts of any-one - A User Generated List ^{Mk III}[/url] thread...

Given your OP only has quotes it's a little hard to get that from the three posts. In any event it didn't warrant four merits. It's kind of a flimsy thread.

Irony.

xtraelv is using screen shots to prove their point.

Seems like only a couple of days ago xtraelv was debunking screen shots as being doctored.

All of this should have been in the OP not teased out like decayed teeth.

But Why?  You're not associated with Cryptopia.  You say that time and time again.

Out of all the 100+ alt coins that were hacked on Cryptopia last year, why do you hold Lavajumper and myself in such dismal regard that you have attacked us so?  You haven't given any other Devs or their supporters distrust on the DT trust settings, so cowering behind you hold us responsible means you have a vendetta against us.

---

I've just had a look at your own trust wall, you've called people you disagree with criminals



and you've just in the last couple of days given one user Red Trust simply because they deleted your post (poor you)



You've even given someone negative trust wall simply because they were friends of someone else you don't like:



I thought @theymos was trying to put a stop to these petty trust wall outbursts?

First of all, I would like to thank you for noticing my elegance. Here the poster means to say 'Eloquence'.  Do you see the irony?

You are correct, I am not Thule. I do not use any alt accounts, and have not for quite some time now, except for one known alt very occasionally. - This is Thule-esque self contadictory gobbledegook, but without the frothing at the mouth anger and abuse  

Archived for future reference: http://archive.fo/SXy7u

Twelve months later I am for a brief moment on the DT then it is taken away.  {1} Thule then starts a thread to place my good name under a cloud.

In the ensuing discussion Suchmoon and The Pharmacist say they are going to review my Red Trusts to see where I may have gotten wrong assertions that various UID's are alts.

Thule then switches their attention to Suchmoon.

quickseller is well known for pushing it's (name) alts under the bus when the alt is no longer of use.

Bizarrely, quickseller firsts contradicts Thule's assertions then increasingly supports Thule's assertions.

Thank-you for your support, I do appreciate it.

Quickseller has quite an eloquent grasp of the English language. Thule speaks English as a second language and has quite a distinctive writing style.

Off Topic

I'm not from DT1, but I added you to my trust list. your contribution to the forum has always been very good

[...]

I suggest Thule might be quickseller in a Trust Wall post.

Twelve months later I am for a brief moment on the DT then it is taken away.  {1} Thule then starts a thread to place my good name under a cloud.

In the ensuing discussion Suchmoon and The Pharmacist say they are going to review my Red Trusts to see where I may have gotten wrong assertions that various UID's are alts.

Thule then switches their attention to Suchmoon.

quickseller is well known for pushing it's (name) alts under the bus when the alt is no longer of use.

Bizarrely, quickseller firsts contradicts Thule's assertions then increasingly supports Thule's assertions.

---

{1}

*edit* that should read logictense starts a short lived reputation thread and then Thule starts a thread...

You are a complete idiot knowing nothing about Max.Max has from beginning the control over Quark.Quark is a clone of a russian crypto which had no success.Digitalindustry and Max worked very closly at that time.
And claiming that digitalindustry didn't returned is a blatant lie.It just needs checking the forum and everyone can see themself he returned.
You are an idiot beliving of a new start with Max.You know how many years Max claims to release a major update ?Since 2013 .I haven't seen a single one in 6 years.
I have spoken with the dev's who worked on the masternodes and all left Quark claiming they got scammed by Max.

So before you dumbfuck make any accusation first learn the history of that coin.
And i will repeat it a last time.I didn't get paid for a task you dumbfuck i got funds for servers and proxies and nothing more.
The deal was clear should i see any sign of scammers being on Quark i will leave.

Instead of posting your nonsense i would recommend making a proper research on Max and how many coins he is running on this forum as quark is only a single one from many.

Here just for you a screenshots of 2 PM of your main dev who worked on Quark



And should you still have not realised it.Max is no dev.He knows some basic's but is totaly unable to make any updates on Quark.

And you know what....since you are such a smartass maybe ask Max for his identity and why he is hiding it for over 7 years.

Yup, and you have put me on your negative DT trust list (Archive) because I first asked, then banned you from posting in my Cryptopia online article list when you and and another user decided it would be ok to have an off topic arguement that was not relevant to the thread.

Clearly that's trust abuse. (by you)

Read my responce to theymos here: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.49604562

So you are absolutely sure no one else sent you 1,000 QRK?
The issue is not the old forum and what happened way back then.  It's irrelevent to the new development.
DI hasn't returned.
The new thread was set up by max.
The issue is you being sent 10,000 QRK to perform a task.  Due to your own doubts/paranoia/conspiracy theories you decided not to do this.
I don't have an issue with this, you're completely entitled to change your mind as far as I'm concerned.
But it's only right you return said payment to the new dev who wasn't even around way back in 13/14.  That's the normal thing to do.  He sent them to you in good faith.
Where did you get your moral sense from, a car crash?

No no other member sent to me 1000 quark.
And no this wasn't paid for doing a job.
If you would at least spent some time and read that old forum if it still exists you would see i was holding at that time quarks from 2013 or 2014 and offered my help for free since some high reputated member convinced me that all the scammers are gone (there was a big debate about it between me and them) and there is only the community left which is trying to get that coin back on track.
I offered my help for free asking only for the cost of servers and proxies and also instantly made it clear should i see a scammer getting back active on Quark i will instantly leave.
Server and proxies have been bought and what happened is that digitalindustry came back who scammed houndred of thousand USD or even millions and who always coworked with Max doing this scam on diffrent coins.
The reputated members guaranteed me that Max isnt working with digitanindustry anymore and that he claimed himself that working with him was a big mistake.
Everything was a poor lie to get the community back and increase the demand via fake update promises like they did always.
As soon as i saw digitalindustry being back i instantly knew its the same scam they did twice on quark before and i left.
I clearly said why i'm leaving and all the crooks jumping on me attacking how i could attack Max and calling him a scammer left themself 6-12 months later seeing there is not a single progress at all.
The only legit guys on Quark were cryptohunter who was way more positiv on Quark than myself and we always had hard debates about it in the past and the chinese investor who tried to take control over it.

But you know what ?Max has the only control over it and he is not willing to give it away.How do i know it ?Because the dev's who worked on the masternodes contacted me asking about my honest opinions and informing me about everything what is going on internal even i didn't wanted to know it.
The masternodes for Quark were a long time ready to be implemented.The dev contacted me upset saying that Max would not allow the implementation of the masternodes even they have been successfull tested
but wanted to switch to something else.If i remember it correctly using masternodes of Dash.

So if i see punks like you accusing me of scamming where it was me and some high ranked members on this board who actually exposed that scam back in 2012/13 where Bill Still got bribed,a big marketing campaign has been bought by digitalindustry and everyone waiting for Max Kaiser where these same scumback dumped coins and stoll all peoples money when Quark was on CMC #3 than i'm asking what is wrong with you ?
Pissed that you lost all your money on quark ?
Before leaving quark i mentioned it many times to people to leave quark as its going to die and i had right a second time.
Back in 2013 i was also attacked for being a bankster,psyop etc when warning about Quark and these scammers.
Not many listened but these who listened sent me PM's thanking to make them aware of it so they started digging deeper.


So if you punk wanna accuse me of not helping promoting a coin where people would have lost all their money you can go on.
Since from my leaving many years passed at least show me a single update Max made during these years ?
Didn't you guys promoted that major updates is going to be released soon during the time i left and even had to create a new self moderated thread for quark so you could delete all negative comments?

I think this is relevant:

I do not view it as appropriate for trust ratings to relate primarily to non-trust matters. By giving someone negative trust, you're basically attaching a note to all of their posts telling people "warning: do not trade with this person!". If we can get DT working well enough, in the future I'd like to prevent guests from even viewing topics by negative-trust users in trust-enabled sections, so you have to ask yourself whether your negative trust would warrant this sort of significant effect.

In particular, in my view:
 - Giving negative trust for being an annoying poster is inappropriate, since this has nothing to do with their trustworthiness. If they're disrupting discussion or never adding anything, then that's something for moderators to deal with, and you should report their posts and/or complain in Meta about it.
 - Giving negative trust for merit trading and deceptive alt-account use may be appropriate, but you should use a light touch so that people don't feel paranoid.
 - You should be willing to forgive past mistakes if the person seems unlikely to do it again.
 - It is absolutely not appropriate to give someone negative trust because you disagree with them. I'm disappointed in the reaction to this post. Although H8bussesNbicycles is perhaps not particularly trustworthy for other reasons, the reasons many people gave for neg-trusting him are inappropriate. You can argue that what he's advocating is bad on a utilitarian level, but he would disagree, and his advocacy of a certain Trust philosophy doesn't by itself mean that he's an untrustworthy person. DT selection is meant to be affected by user lists, and it is totally legitimate to try to honestly convince other (real) people to use a list more in-line with your views.
 
I'm not going to blacklist people from DT selection due to not following my views, since a big point of this new system is to get me less involved, but if a culture somewhat compatible with my views does not eventually develop, then I will consider this more freeform DT selection to be a failure, and I'll probably get rid of it in favor of enforcing custom trust lists.

you should be willing to forgive past mistakes if the person seems unlikely to do it again.

retaliatory ratings