Topic: Timelord2067 - Repeated trust abuse. Fake accuser. Please consider negging him. - page 2. (Read 679 times)

I am missing something. Why timelord2067 tag showing to me by default even he is not on DT. Also He isn't on my custom list. But if add ;dt with url then his feedback hid from me. What is the reason ? If someone added him custom list from my list it will show to by default ? So Whoever on my trust list they are DT1 to me ? But I select all depth 2.

One more on my exclusion list...

Why is tigerfree on the DT2 list all of the sudden?

Looks like bones261 and amishmanish have this account listed as trusted.  bones261 also has Timelord2067 listed as trusted.

Never doubted it any second

He was briefly in DT on the 14th and ended up excluded. The system works.

I won't red him for this. Wouldn't say he is untrustworthy.

However this makes me consider adding him to my dis-trust list.

Wouldn't care about it if I were you until he becomes DT.

If he does I believe you will find plenty (including me) that would counter his red. I also like dark humor and everyone should know that leaving too large amount on an exchange or any wallet you don't control the private key is a bad idea. It looks pretty obvious to me that your post wasn't about actually bragging.

Feel free to tag me here (writing my nick in a post) if he should ever join the DT network.

What if he is soon? then that neg will glow red trust on his account with every post.

If this person was DT i would take the issue to meta board where it gets more attention.

I would do this because it would be an abuse of the SYSTEM the system can only be fixed by the admin to prevent such abuse happening over and over again.

There needs be strict criteria for red trust else it will always be open to abuse.

He's not on DT so why do you care so much?

Long story short. I made a joke post in Sexcoin thread about cryptopia hack, which I then explained to be just a banal JOKE / entertaining post.

This dumbed down clown going under the handle timelord2067 shows up then and leaves me negative trust for allegedly being responsible for the said hack.

Alright, I made that post, I realize I might have seemed a bit starkly with joking about the hack, saying I hacked something nevertheless its not a reason to blindly unjustifiably neg me for nothing. And makes no significance whatsoever since everyone apparently realizes I was joking I deleted a post and apologized publicly for ever bringing this up.

Trying to reach out to Timelord2067 to politely negotiate the removal of red trust:



in response getting this:



After which he blocks my DM.

I get to expound the situation directly in Sexcoin thread since no other means of communication with Timelord2067 would work.




https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.49311625
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.49313788

No reaction from him except stupid "No".

Whats funny this cuck happened to scoop some positive feedback from trusted users. Then (apparently) was booted out of default trust for randomly lambasting users he never dealt with. Just check his trust summary. Also I just cant accept nor understand this kind of conduct - when you explain, apologize but in the final end you get flagged anyway. For nothing.

In case he is added to default trust again (someone revises their feedback) I would get red trust. Based on fake rubbish coming from an individual who is unable to conduct themselves in a professional manner nor to rationalize their actions.

The worst part, this cant be personal because he has no idea who I am. Cant be legit / accounted for because I never hacked any exchanges / there is no proof of me being a hacker. The only assumption thats left is that he is trying to compensate for something someone has done to him. There is no chance you would shit in peoples pan online for no reason unless you harbour a grudge in real life.

Childhood abuse? Roughhousing? No Play Station? Well. Your issue.

Please consider leaving a relevant notice in Timelord2067's trust summary section. Sends out fake accusations based on delusional prejudiced fancies. Not to be trusted in anything.

I also strongly recommend that @marlboroza, @Gunthar, @owlcatz, @actmyname rethink their feedback they gave to this fellow. He / she needs to be painted full-red first to start to think.