Small thread as its not viable to sift through 100s of pages in each camp. Equally, each thread is filled with die hard supports who can't see the logic from the fud.
The question is, how is bitfury able to achieve 0.8W/GH (confirmed, in hand, 3rd party tested, from WALL) with 65nm, yet KNC is only predicting 1.6W/GH (theoretical, not tested a chip yet, not tested hash rate etc)? Who fucked up? Is KNC lying about their process node?
The question is, how is bitfury able to achieve 0.8W/GH (confirmed, in hand, 3rd party tested, from WALL) with 65nm, yet KNC is only predicting 1.6W/GH (theoretical, not tested a chip yet, not tested hash rate etc)? Who fucked up? Is KNC lying about their process node?
Bitfury asic chip is 55nm but not 65 and BFL is using 65 asic chip.
