Set an example. 
Topic: To be revealed or not? (Read 2041 times)
Reveal himself.. Set an example.
Set an example.
I doubt he email account contains any useful information on who Satoshi really is. Satoshi wanted to hide from the world and he/them would have deleted any sensitive info from the account. If I have control of the account, I would not reveal who he/they are. The success of bitcoin may be compromised if the public knows the true identity of the creator.
My vote is to be revealed. That might be a big help in making the price of bitcoin increase.
If you are the hacker of Satoshi Nakamoto's email?
Would you reveal him/them or not?
Would you reveal him/them or not?
I guess most would try to blackmail him.
It is not his responsibilty to reaveal himself. He will just attract attention and might mess up the things he built.
I wouldn't! To be fair though I wouldn't even think to hack someone anyway, if they wish to remain anonymous that is entirely their choice and that should be respected. Anyone who wants to hack someone obviously has nothing better to do with their time.
Sell to the highest bidder I guess. After covering my arse.
If you are the hacker of Satoshi Nakamoto's email?
Would you reveal him/them or not?
Would you reveal him/them or not?
I AM the hacker and I will release his nudes after I'm finished with all the celebs I hacked recently. "Who is this 4chan".
I wouldn't. i would delete all infos. and Satoshi should do this too now.
Can someone link me to the mailhack news, is it confirmed or only a rumor?
I've got better things to do than hack his emails, but I think if he wants to remain anonomus then that's how he should remain.
You would have to be a pretty big asshole to go and reveal Satoshi. I doubt that the hacker actually knows who he is though. Probably just an attempt to get other assholes who would send money to see Satoshi revealed to his address.
I would personally as its not going to hurt satoshi if he is still alive. Probs just "alot" of attention
No I would never hurt Satoshi I love him 
(no homo tho..)
(no homo tho..) No but I might insist upon meeting him, as selfish as that sounds.
This.
If you are the hacker of Satoshi Nakamoto's email?
Would you reveal him/them or not?
Would you reveal him/them or not?
If he wanted to be revealed he would have revealed himself. Lets do the guy a favour an leave him alone. With the amount of bitcoin he might have he could be a huge target maybe this is also why he prefers to remain anon.
So, are you thinking that Satoshi Nakamoto is a he and not a she and he's an a not a them.
Let's say you do, and something bad happens to him/her, how would you feel?
I also say, leave <> alone. 
I also say, leave <
If you are the hacker of Satoshi Nakamoto's email?
Would you reveal him/them or not?
Would you reveal him/them or not?
If he wanted to be revealed he would have revealed himself. Lets do the guy a favour an leave him alone. With the amount of bitcoin he might have he could be a huge target maybe this is also why he prefers to remain anon.
No but I might insist upon meeting him, as selfish as that sounds.
So you believe that Satoshi is only a person and not a collective?
No but I might insist upon meeting him, as selfish as that sounds.
So you believe that Satoshi is only a person and not a collective?
Jump to: