token supply | Bitcointalksearch.org

CryptoOtopusso

newbie

Activity: 24

Merit: 0

Quote from: Saisher on January 17, 2020, 08:47:47 PM

Quote from: damar09 on January 15, 2020, 06:50:37 PM

sometimes I think if you look at the amount of token supply in such a large amount that trillions and trillions after the project runs several months or years, the token will be burned, what for if you make tokens with a large supply, but will be burned, ...?

Roll Eyes

If you check the market we seldom see coins with trillions supply, and if there are coins with billions of supply, they are backed by a solid products and services, there is no need to create coins with trillion supply without anything unique on it, it's just a waste of time investing here.

I agree. There is no much important how big supply it is - the vision is most important

Saisher

full member

Activity: 2324

Merit: 175

Quote from: damar09 on January 15, 2020, 06:50:37 PM

sometimes I think if you look at the amount of token supply in such a large amount that trillions and trillions after the project runs several months or years, the token will be burned, what for if you make tokens with a large supply, but will be burned, ...?

Roll Eyes

If you check the market we seldom see coins with trillions supply, and if there are coins with billions of supply, they are backed by a solid products and services, there is no need to create coins with trillion supply without anything unique on it, it's just a waste of time investing here.

Coroline

sr. member

Activity: 1092

Merit: 256

Quote from: damar09 on January 15, 2020, 06:50:37 PM

sometimes I think if you look at the amount of token supply in such a large amount that trillions and trillions after the project runs several months or years, the token will be burned, what for if you make tokens with a large supply, but will be burned, ...?

Roll Eyes

yes it is a way to make the price of the token stable if the total supply of the project token is too large it will affect the price while the investor only has maybe around 10-20% of the total supply and that is a great way

disconnectme

hero member

Activity: 1876

Merit: 512

Most of these tokens were created just to capitalise on the price fo the tokens if there is a huge adoption, before what we use to have was 100 million tokens and 10% of the total circulating tokens for the team but now we see that 30% or more are being held by the team, now no demand for this tokens because they serve virtually no function on their platform and community are scared they team is likely going to dump on them so the team come to their senses to burn and eradicate that fear from the market

Mealea

member

Activity: 300

Merit: 11

FRX: Ferocious Alpha

I have wonder several times myself about the issues of burning. Why not supply less amount of token and don't bother about burning, why supply so much and the next thing you are thinking of is burning.

nekonyun

full member

Activity: 882

Merit: 101

burning tokens has an effect on tokens making the price of tokens go up because a lot of the total supply of tokens increasingly makes the price of tokens cheap

isaac_clarke22

sr. member

Activity: 1610

Merit: 264

It just encourages a lot of investors to buy many tokens. It's like a trick to their eyes that it will surely be an expensive coin in the future, but it turns out it is the opposite. In fact, these project with overwhelmingly high supplies but shit value are quite common actually.

cutesgirl

sr. member

Activity: 938

Merit: 251

Token supply is become my first checking with some altcoin before investing with IEO, ICO and trading with altcoin listed on market. When getting have much supply coin I will think with price on IEO and ICO matching or not with how much their supply and price selling during ICO and IEO, if looking with higher price but supply very much I think is not good investment way.

gensol

jr. member

Activity: 714

Merit: 3

Burning tokens comes as an after measure to scale token price more. Some project don't have good token metrics they don't base their supply on any substantial thing they claim the world has over a billion population when mass adoption sets in the supply will be effective.

damar09

full member

Activity: 434

Merit: 101

★Bitvest.io★ Play Plinko or Invest!

Quote from: Spider A4 on January 16, 2020, 12:39:28 PM

Quote from: damar09 on January 15, 2020, 06:50:37 PM

sometimes I think if you look at the amount of token supply in such a large amount that trillions and trillions after the project runs several months or years, the token will be burned, what for if you make tokens with a large supply, but will be burned, ...?

Roll Eyes

When mostly large number of token supply projects worthless after listing than team try to reduce token supply the only way of burn.

Azbit burn 10 billion tokens because their token price low 20x from IEO price i think so they decide to burn.
NPXSXEM, NPXS burned several billions of tokens a couple of times. Total supply is highly affected in coin value.

maybe you can see how they travel between NPXS and XDCE they have a large inventory, but there are differences between these two tokens, where NPXS makes additional supplies aimed at giving existence to the crypto world, and making NPXSEM, but after that NPXS experiences a decrease in the price drastic, and for XDCE I found a price increase, maybe this is a small example where a large token supply / increase supply to make it bigger, it will really make the price go down

Kersh768

sr. member

Activity: 658

Merit: 256

Freshdice.com

Quote from: damar09 on January 15, 2020, 06:50:37 PM

sometimes I think if you look at the amount of token supply in such a large amount that trillions and trillions after the project runs several months or years, the token will be burned, what for if you make tokens with a large supply, but will be burned, ...?

Roll Eyes

I agree. It doesn't make sense why there are projects that creates a very large token supply during a bounty which literally makes it a big project at a first glance due to a massive token supply and a large percentage provided for the campaign allocation to be distributed to participants which includes bounty hunters as well as potential investors. For me, it becomes a trick or strategy to attract bounty hunters getting into their project because it seems to promising and attractive being rewarded by large amount of token after the campaign. But it is not working like that because a massive amount which is not distributed as a reward or the remains from the recent token sale is being burned due to the reason that they are the excess tokens that seems to be unused. After thorough observation, it doesn't really matter how much token you have because the price still do matters that most since no matter how massive amount you have if the price is being dumped right after getting listed, it will still be a low income for you.

BeManga

sr. member

Activity: 962

Merit: 269

CryptoDirectories.com

Quote from: damar09 on January 15, 2020, 06:50:37 PM

sometimes I think if you look at the amount of token supply in such a large amount that trillions and trillions after the project runs several months or years, the token will be burned, what for if you make tokens with a large supply, but will be burned, ...?

Roll Eyes

its not really a good idea a lot of coins already make similar to that in the past
and there will be a large sell wall in 1 satoshi and it will almost impossible to sell your coin

FairUser

sr. member

Activity: 1344

Merit: 264

bit.ly/3QXp3oh | Ultimate Launchpad on TON

Quote from: Coltpython on January 17, 2020, 06:19:44 AM

I dislike projects that have a huge token supply. It is ridiculous to me. However, I do not think that token supply still influences the performance of any crypto coin like it did around 2017

They create tokens with a large supply because it will help the token's price to be lower when starting to list at exchanges. And after a long period of operation the price will increase easily if the project works well and there are products. Think about it, if they create tokens with low supply, the price of that token will certainly be very high and no investor will dare to risk buying new altcoins at such high prices. All this is their business strategy

Xxmodded

sr. member

Activity: 2296

Merit: 315

SOL.BIOKRIPT.COM

I hate with developer where allocated token supply look very much for their team advice than how much token supply for investor, how come to make price keep higher if the developer always sell their coin and supply on market always up but never give effect to make coin keep higher price, we faced bad time after listing on exchange market and developer or advice team sell with bigger amount.

damar09

full member

Activity: 434

Merit: 101

★Bitvest.io★ Play Plinko or Invest!

Quote from: aioc on January 17, 2020, 07:36:33 AM

Quote from: tiang_tower on January 17, 2020, 06:52:14 AM

Quote from: Coltpython on January 17, 2020, 06:19:44 AM

I dislike projects that have a huge token supply. It is ridiculous to me. However, I do not think that token supply still influences the performance of any crypto coin like it did around 2017

However, I see a big influence on the curio project which has a very low token supply, at the moment the price of the token cur is almost as high as $ 1 in the market, so the influence on the supply of tokens is still there, even though the role is more interested in the market.

Small or huge supply, the bottom line is will the community support the coin and what's it's usage for the community and does it has a platform people can use if there is none, then it's a shitcoin whether it supplies is as huge as 1 billion or as low as 1 million, it's not the main concern of the investors.

regarding the amount of large or small supply, between 1 billion and even trillions of supplies, and as low as only 1 million, actually influences investors, because it shows how a project is going well or not, and in my opinion a supply with a maximum between 21m-50m will more profitable than supplies above 1 trillion. Because the coins / tokens that have a reasonable supply, the developer will focus more on marketing the coins. And the circulation will be more maintained.

aioc

hero member

Activity: 2926

Merit: 567

Quote from: tiang_tower on January 17, 2020, 06:52:14 AM

Quote from: Coltpython on January 17, 2020, 06:19:44 AM

I dislike projects that have a huge token supply. It is ridiculous to me. However, I do not think that token supply still influences the performance of any crypto coin like it did around 2017

However, I see a big influence on the curio project which has a very low token supply, at the moment the price of the token cur is almost as high as $ 1 in the market, so the influence on the supply of tokens is still there, even though the role is more interested in the market.

Small or huge supply, the bottom line is will the community support the coin and what's it's usage for the community and does it has a platform people can use if there is none, then it's a shitcoin whether it supplies is as huge as 1 billion or as low as 1 million, it's not the main concern of the investors.

Natalim

hero member

Activity: 3094

Merit: 606

BTC to the MOON in 2019

Quote from: damar09 on January 15, 2020, 06:50:37 PM

sometimes I think if you look at the amount of token supply in such a large amount that trillions and trillions after the project runs several months or years, the token will be burned, what for if you make tokens with a large supply, but will be burned, ...?

Roll Eyes

They'll only burn it to attract investors because it will apply the supply and demand, now if the project will become successful a lesser supply would mean a greater price it will become, so investors will try to investor when there's token burn because that' what they speculate will happen.

monineklutak

sr. member

Activity: 1890

Merit: 252

The OGz Club

Quote from: tiang_tower on January 17, 2020, 06:52:14 AM

Quote from: Coltpython on January 17, 2020, 06:19:44 AM

I dislike projects that have a huge token supply. It is ridiculous to me. However, I do not think that token supply still influences the performance of any crypto coin like it did around 2017

However, I see a big influence on the curio project which has a very low token supply, at the moment the price of the token cur is almost as high as $ 1 in the market, so the influence on the supply of tokens is still there, even though the role is more interested in the market.

usually if a project or coin that has a total supply of a small price of a coin or token can be expensive, but for Curio under $ 1, I don't know why, maybe because there is only a small circulation supply in the market

Dart18

sr. member

Activity: 1400

Merit: 259

Yes, they wont start making small supply just like bitcoin.
It will be damn expensive for every token that will be bought. I will ignore that of course.
I will just stick with bitcoin if ever it had the same number of supply.

The idea of having so much token and then a sudden hype comes out.
That is what investors will run for to buy in a blink. Yeah, the foolish ones. Grin

tiang_tower

full member

Activity: 826

Merit: 100

Quote from: Coltpython on January 17, 2020, 06:19:44 AM

I dislike projects that have a huge token supply. It is ridiculous to me. However, I do not think that token supply still influences the performance of any crypto coin like it did around 2017

However, I see a big influence on the curio project which has a very low token supply, at the moment the price of the token cur is almost as high as $ 1 in the market, so the influence on the supply of tokens is still there, even though the role is more interested in the market.

Topic: token supply (Read 790 times)