Topic: Tools for managers to check quality of posts (both merited & unmerited posts) (Read 2491 times)

6. Merits received/sent in the last 120 days" script, v0.2, by TryNinja

I luckily saw the script built by TriNinja, that is helpful for managers who can use it to check that number of received merits in applications are correct or fake ones. I saw many applicants in campaigns try to apply with incorrect number of received merits.

Theymos is well aware of that, that's why he introduced merit sources. It's also added on the merit page, that it's useless to store your Smerits, according to theymos sometime In the future he could consider decaying Smerits of Smerits hoarders.
We all feel or have felt that way sometimes, but you know you can apply to be a merit source, maybe theymos just might choose you.
Even if such users may not need to rank up anymore, How else would users appraise their good posts, if not through merits, and if they do not earn merits, how are they to merit other quality posts, which you already complained is missing.
It's a discussion forum, users should be extroverts in here!

This forum is too selfish for a merit system. How many merits remain dormant in so many users accounts. I bet some have not to spend a single merit. You should be punished for not spending merits.
I have no merits left to give and never do since I always use them since that's what they are for. Pity most people do not share my view and would rather horde for no reason. Funny how some people can spend hours on a forum making tons of posts yet cannot take 2 seconds to help someone out. They do not give you enough merits either. They should take the dormant merits from selfish people and give them to users like myself so we can actually give them out. When I post I look for nice posts. Not posts I agree with but just well-written posts. To try and be nice and to encourage people to be active. People who don't spam and can have a nice conversation online deserve merits. These other clowns can stay on their current rank. They bring nothing to the forum and I cannot stand selfish people. I often feel so band since I have no merits to give anyone and I see nice posts everyday. How can you call this a good system if the people who actually use it are so limited??

Another thing is if you look at the merits graph you will notice there is somewhat of an inner circle. You will notice many people within the same group meriting one another. All those merits have done has increased the gap between the normal user and the elites. I have even seen many times even long term users give merits to people who are admins and do not need them and to people who are already legendary. WTF even.

You get a merit-based on one persons opinion, not on quality. Popular people and topic starters get so many merits. You just shifted from spamming to basically sucking up. Many topics are created with the sole purpose of getting merits. How does that solve anything? The reason for making topics is the same as the reason people use to spam.

Some people don't enjoy making topics and they are severely punished for it. Those who have ranked up through merits have sweat blood to get there. They find articles and things they hope others will find interesting and only care for what others will like not what they like or what they believe.

People who often deserve merits will never see the light of day since their posts get buried by shit. Merits are totally pointless and only reflect how much sucking up you can do and who you know. Introverted people are doomed. How is that a fair system? Not everyone wants to be the centre of attention all the time to suck up merits.

That script to check total received / sent merits within last 120 days is very great tool for managers. It is helpful for managers to check real figures of applicants who sometimes apply with fake figures of received merits. Without that script, managers can estimate total merit received within last 120 days but the script help them to get exact figures.
Script built by TryNinja

Those tools are helpful, because we can have very good overview on each user. After that, we should move to further steps, with manual checkings on users' post quality over different randomized chosen periods. I do think those tools are helpful, but nothing can replace human perfectly.

I can agree with you.
When I thinking to give merit for some post, I checking how much is this post helpful for other users, constructive or informative.
It's the same for campaign managers, I think.
They have to check all posts manually and decide about post quality personally.
I don't think that some tools can replace 100 % manual checking.

You can make your charts with two colors: Blue (for received merits), and Red (for sent merits)

Blue:

Red:


Simply replacing my profile ID before _blue & _red by your profile ID, then you will get your charts.

Yes.

Correct.

See Full merit transaction history for any user - with GRAPHS, BANS and BBCode! for details

Here's yours: http://loyce.club/Merit/history/23092.html
And BBCode for posting on the forum: http://loyce.club/Merit/history/BBCode/23092.txt

The charts show the entire Merit history since the system's inception?

And red charts show sent merit points, and blue charts show merit points received? It wasn't mentioned anywhere, and reading 'two color options' my first impression was there are two colors to choose if someone doesn't like either of them

Managers or users can view their merit charts, by using the following code
For example, I display my merit chart with different colors (there are two color options, Blue and Red):
Blue:

Red:

I simply collected available tools provided by other users. Things you suggested require technical to build up a tool, that I don't have to do it myself. Sorry for any conveniences you get with all available tools I present in the OP.

---

Sometimes, posts deleted by users themselves when they clean up their post history and during process they think such past merited posts are outdated, non-sense, etc. Sometimes, forum members easily to merit posts of well-known users for joking posts, that likely deleted later by posts' owners.

Maybe a single percentage of the number of the merited posts deleted / total earned merits would be interesting...
As far as I'm concerned, a merit worthy post is not going to be deleted anytime (OK, except when a thread becomes a spam megathread because of the spammers, and the whole thread gets deleted), so if someone has a high percentage of the deleted merited posts, it would be at least suspicious

Thank you Loycev! for showing my merit history in chart view.

Yes,I am also feeling like I am contributing something useful to the community in the right way since I am started to earn some merits in the very recent days

---

Its not hard to find our forum's AI with new avatar.

This is why your earned-merits bar chart gives very good overview on merit history, I called it as a good chart to identify intensity of earned merits.

There would be no use of using tools if the managers would still require to do manual checking of merited and general posts of a user. It would rather be less time-consuming if they only check the profiles of the applicants and then proceed to their post history. An earned-merit-check should only be done if the manager doesn't find the post history convincing which would somehow make him doubtful about the earned Merits of that user. Otherwise, if a user has a solid post history and a clean trust as well, there should be no problem for a manager to hire him up.

A constructive user would generally never need to commit Merit abuse since they can earn them just by posting constructively which they can. So, only a user--- who doesn't seem to be constructive by their recent or general post history and has still got Merits, would require the checks about abuse and stuff

Unfortunately no tool can help with this except manually checking the posts and checking the posts that got merited. Also, who merited the posts. That is the only way to do it and it is a lengthy process. A tool can only show you the stats but not the quality of a users posts.

This topic is for checking participants before they join. I don't think anyone here considers bounty spammers to be serious users, why else would they accept made-up tokens as payment.

Hhampuz is bringing many new Bitcoin paying campaigns to the forum, those were scarce for the past year, so I welcome this development.

Let's see:
It tells me you're consistently earning Merit, and the amount is going up.
Some users have a single high spike, which is something to check for Merit abuse.

When you check the merit history of me in the chart look,you may not see much blue on it,there will be some growth on the recent days,and if you check most of the people's merit history there won't be much blue to compare so I guess manual checking is the better way.This tool is good to check the fellas on the most merited list.

Post with no lower than 100 characters is the only do-able method bounty managers can think of to reduce spam. Very rare managers are aware of quality or they are but not being able to control (too time-consuming to check). Those tools that you mentioned in you topic are useful but trust me, in normal bounty campaigns, to find a real quality post is as difficult as finding a needle in a haystack. Some campaigns (Chip Mixer, Fortuna Jack..) are for high quality posters but their rules are strict and payings are very worthy.

I agreed that even constructive users sometime turned off, or inactively in the forum, due to their personal reasons, so you made a good point.
However, I thought the 120-day period is enough to check and have neutral, and exact overview on quality of users' posts.So, to save time, but still remain effectively checking quality of posts, managers randomly check posts.
By random, I meant randomly choose some period (pages in post history) and check posts ' quality in those random-chosen periods.