Topic: Top 10 ERC20 ICOs that Actually Were Successful - page 2. (Read 274 times)
The list is dominated by the stablecoins even if it qualifies to be taken into account you must include USDT aswell but in my opinion including stablecoin as top 10 ERC20 Succesfull ICO is really wrong I mean there's no ICO for all these stablecoin to begin with they just come up with the reserve fund and offering people their stablecoin and not even opening initial coin offering and some names are even I don't familiar with so maybe there's another factor that makes you decide to put those list of coin you consider most succesfull.
0x and BlocPal
BAT and BNB
OmiseGo for me
BAT is also erc20 token. As far as i know more than 70% of crypto in the market were coming from the ERC20 asset. But it looks like we must try put a differentiate for those projects that already ran on its own platform.
There was a lot of successful ERC20 icos. EOS was also starting from the ERC 20 asset. I feel curious about what factors that have been used to determine which was the succesful ICO.
There was a lot of successful ERC20 icos. EOS was also starting from the ERC 20 asset. I feel curious about what factors that have been used to determine which was the succesful ICO.
According to ethplorer the list is different. In top 50 by capitalization LEO,LINK,HT is in top 10. Maybe some websites have their own list.
You can check ethplorer top lists : https://ethplorer.io/top
You can check ethplorer top lists : https://ethplorer.io/top
Give me some projects that actually were successful aside from the ones in this list:
https://cryptotradernews.com/cryptocurrency/10-ico-successes-built-on-the-ethereum-network/
To me, the top performers have been BlocPal (actually have a working product), BNB (because binance, duh) and chainlink!
https://cryptotradernews.com/cryptocurrency/10-ico-successes-built-on-the-ethereum-network/
To me, the top performers have been BlocPal (actually have a working product), BNB (because binance, duh) and chainlink!
Jump to: