Pages:
Author

Topic: Top 4 Satoshi Nakamoto quotes of all time (Read 14178 times)

sr. member
Activity: 252
Merit: 250
March 04, 2014, 12:54:26 PM
#54
I just spent a couple hours reading through Satoshi's 1,000+ posts and plucked out my four favorites:

    1. (I’ve been working on bitcoin’s design) since 2007. At some point I became convinced there was a way to do this without any trust required at all and couldn’t resist to keep thinking about it.

    2. Lost coins only make everyone else’s coins worth slightly more. Think of it as a donation to everyone.

    3. Sorry to be a wet blanket. Writing a description for (bitcoin) for general audiences is bloody hard. There’s nothing to relate it to.

    4. I’m sure that in 20 years there will either be very large (bitcoin) transaction volume or no volume.

I've got a couple dozen more here: http://crypt.la/2014/01/06/satoshi-nakamoto-quotes/

I like this

Lost coins only make everyone else’s coins worth slightly more. Think of it as a donation to everyone.
sr. member
Activity: 560
Merit: 250
"Trading Platform of The Future!"
February 28, 2014, 11:56:39 PM
#53
satoshi could have been a woman
There are no records of Nakamoto's identity or identities prior to the creation of Bitcoin. Satoshi is a male, Japanese name, whose meaning is variously given as "wise", "clear-thinking", "quick-witted"[8][9] or "intelligent history", i.e. a person with intelligent ancestors.[10] "Nakamoto"(中本) is a Japanese family name.

Possible? Yes. Likely? No.
newbie
Activity: 12
Merit: 0
January 15, 2014, 02:52:36 AM
#52
satoshi could have been a woman
hero member
Activity: 518
Merit: 500
January 09, 2014, 05:58:25 AM
#51
I just spent a couple hours reading through Satoshi's 1,000+ posts and plucked out my four favorites:

    1. (I’ve been working on bitcoin’s design) since 2007. At some point I became convinced there was a way to do this without any trust required at all and couldn’t resist to keep thinking about it.

    2. Lost coins only make everyone else’s coins worth slightly more. Think of it as a donation to everyone.

    3. Sorry to be a wet blanket. Writing a description for (bitcoin) for general audiences is bloody hard. There’s nothing to relate it to.

    4. I’m sure that in 20 years there will either be very large (bitcoin) transaction volume or no volume.

I've got a couple dozen more here: http://crypt.la/2014/01/06/satoshi-nakamoto-quotes/

Satoshi is probably* a Brit**.
http://britishisms.wordpress.com/2012/04/30/bloody/

* Yes. Also a master at track covering, but across 1000+ posts, maybe not, especially when focused on software/crypto issues.
** Yes. Yes. Heard it before? Stop reading this then!


Or he could be bloody Australlian... seriously, Aussies have more a stranglehold over 'bloody' than Brits.

Bloody hell...

He ain't bloody British and he ain't bloody Australian Wink
newbie
Activity: 28
Merit: 0
January 09, 2014, 01:14:19 AM
#50
I just spent a couple hours reading through Satoshi's 1,000+ posts and plucked out my four favorites:

    1. (I’ve been working on bitcoin’s design) since 2007. At some point I became convinced there was a way to do this without any trust required at all and couldn’t resist to keep thinking about it.

    2. Lost coins only make everyone else’s coins worth slightly more. Think of it as a donation to everyone.

    3. Sorry to be a wet blanket. Writing a description for (bitcoin) for general audiences is bloody hard. There’s nothing to relate it to.

    4. I’m sure that in 20 years there will either be very large (bitcoin) transaction volume or no volume.

I've got a couple dozen more here: http://crypt.la/2014/01/06/satoshi-nakamoto-quotes/

Satoshi is probably* a Brit**.
http://britishisms.wordpress.com/2012/04/30/bloody/

* Yes. Also a master at track covering, but across 1000+ posts, maybe not, especially when focused on software/crypto issues.
** Yes. Yes. Heard it before? Stop reading this then!


Or he could be bloody Australlian... seriously, Aussies have more a stranglehold over 'bloody' than Brits.

Bloody hell...
hero member
Activity: 518
Merit: 500
January 08, 2014, 09:41:52 PM
#49
I just spent a couple hours reading through Satoshi's 1,000+ posts and plucked out my four favorites:

    1. (I’ve been working on bitcoin’s design) since 2007. At some point I became convinced there was a way to do this without any trust required at all and couldn’t resist to keep thinking about it.

    2. Lost coins only make everyone else’s coins worth slightly more. Think of it as a donation to everyone.

    3. Sorry to be a wet blanket. Writing a description for (bitcoin) for general audiences is bloody hard. There’s nothing to relate it to.

    4. I’m sure that in 20 years there will either be very large (bitcoin) transaction volume or no volume.

I've got a couple dozen more here: http://crypt.la/2014/01/06/satoshi-nakamoto-quotes/


thank you for that. interesting.

it would be nice to read the mails from gavin to satoshi too...

Well Gavin's definitely still alive. Email and ask him to send them to ya Smiley
legendary
Activity: 1148
Merit: 1014
In Satoshi I Trust
January 08, 2014, 09:43:21 AM
#48
I just spent a couple hours reading through Satoshi's 1,000+ posts and plucked out my four favorites:

    1. (I’ve been working on bitcoin’s design) since 2007. At some point I became convinced there was a way to do this without any trust required at all and couldn’t resist to keep thinking about it.

    2. Lost coins only make everyone else’s coins worth slightly more. Think of it as a donation to everyone.

    3. Sorry to be a wet blanket. Writing a description for (bitcoin) for general audiences is bloody hard. There’s nothing to relate it to.

    4. I’m sure that in 20 years there will either be very large (bitcoin) transaction volume or no volume.

I've got a couple dozen more here: http://crypt.la/2014/01/06/satoshi-nakamoto-quotes/


thank you for that. interesting.

it would be nice to read the mails from gavin to satoshi too...
hero member
Activity: 518
Merit: 500
January 08, 2014, 08:47:36 AM
#47
Why is everybody thinking he is still alive ?

He is long gone; back in a random trunk of JP Morgan.  Huh

Another epic fail by JP Morgan then - bitcoin is alive and kicking and bigger than Satoshi probably ever imagined Smiley
full member
Activity: 237
Merit: 100
January 08, 2014, 08:27:02 AM
#46
Thanks for this.  I love this one:

Sorry to be a wet blanket. Writing a description for (bitcoin) for general audiences is bloody hard. There’s nothing to relate it to.

So true....

Reminds me very much of Feynman on explaining magnetism by analogy:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wMFPe-DwULM
sr. member
Activity: 476
Merit: 250
January 08, 2014, 02:45:53 AM
#45
it's unlikely a single personne so no big deal If one of the 3 was hit by a truk or a plane or whatever
member
Activity: 93
Merit: 10
January 08, 2014, 02:29:51 AM
#44
Why is everybody thinking he is still alive ?

He is long gone; back in a random trunk of JP Morgan.  Huh
sr. member
Activity: 476
Merit: 250
January 08, 2014, 02:15:21 AM
#43
#2 obv !!

It's my sign since i'm here Smiley
hero member
Activity: 518
Merit: 500
January 08, 2014, 12:52:44 AM
#42
Does anyone know who satoshi is?  I know he had communicated with the head bitcoin foundation people. Did he give any indication as to why he's secretive about his identity ?

Never heard that question before? Wink yawn ....
full member
Activity: 224
Merit: 104
January 08, 2014, 12:23:28 AM
#41
Does anyone know who satoshi is?  I know he had communicated with the head bitcoin foundation people. Did he give any indication as to why he's secretive about his identity ?
legendary
Activity: 1400
Merit: 1000
January 07, 2014, 11:39:43 PM
#40
Thanks for sharing Grin
hero member
Activity: 518
Merit: 500
January 07, 2014, 10:02:44 PM
#39
Another reason why I believe its one person because his code is bad. that means he is an architect or strategist rather than a coder. I could code better than him. but his thought is revolutionary, probably the most revolutionary of the century.


That's interesting! I know nothing about coding, so tell me: Why is the system still so secure apparently, although he is bad at coding (wouldn't that mean many people are able to crack to code) - how can he get away with bad coding? And what makes code bad? 

I've only looked at the original release briefly, but to me:

It looks rushed; a proof of concept and a prototype. So it's more untidy, messy, code than necessarily *bad* code. Imagine the rough scribblings of a genius mathematician. It may not look pretty but it can still be technically sound.

I would imagine if a group had made it there would have been much more effort in maintaining a clean code base so others can work on it easier. Though, it's still possible that multiple people worked on the design but only one single person did the coding.

I personally would never write "good" code for some far out experimental project either. I'd hack together something quick and messy just to test if it works, then clean it up later.

So then the question is why didn't he clean it up at some point at least?

What you are saying for me speaks more for one single person alone, because if he would have been working in a group, there would be not so much reason to rush.

Another issue is that the more people are involved, the more difficult it becomes to keep totally quiet, in the long run. Maybe some ex-girlfriend of Satoshi will tell the press some day.. Smiley

How much time do you think he would have needed to clean it up and what would have been the advantages of cleaning up (besides it just looking better to the few people who know about coding)?

He let others clean it up afterwards Smiley

Or perhaps he's a maths and economics genius but not great at programming. It happens .....
sr. member
Activity: 455
Merit: 251
January 07, 2014, 09:12:45 PM
#38
I found this interesting...
I actually did this kind of backwards.  I had to
write all the code before I could convince myself that I could solve every
problem, then I wrote the paper.  I think I will be able to release the code
sooner than I could write a detailed spec.
BCB
vip
Activity: 1078
Merit: 1002
BCJ
January 07, 2014, 03:59:37 PM
#37
Thanks for this.  I love this one:

Sorry to be a wet blanket. Writing a description for (bitcoin) for general audiences is bloody hard. There’s nothing to relate it to.

So true....
hero member
Activity: 546
Merit: 500
January 07, 2014, 03:40:26 PM
#36
It has the potential for a positive feedback loop; as users increase, the value goes up" - Feb 11, 2009

http://p2pfoundation.ning.com/forum/topics/bitcoin-open-source  (in comments)

Can somebody elaborate on what is meant by a positive feedback loop as it relates to Bitcoin?
Or does it literally just mean "as users increase, the value goes up"?

The more people that there are involved in some way with Bitcoin, the more valuable the system becomes, which gives greater incentive to encourage growth.
full member
Activity: 195
Merit: 100
January 07, 2014, 03:38:23 PM
#35
another reason why its not a group is that no one in the group came forward to say anything after he disappeared. Secondly, he would have consistently use "We" instead of I. I think the use of "We" refers to his github contributors.
Pages:
Jump to: