Only reason i can think of is that you took arbitrary number because you want to insert your favorite project with less competition examples.
Yes, that won't be farther from the truth. However, we don't have to discard the insight OP has let us into there. Just peruse those tokens and find out (DYOR) if they're worth your penny. I once had Verasity for months in 2021 until I sold it off in frustration. It didn't move much, and was one of the disappointing investments I made last year. Like someone rightly observed below, Metaverse wasn't even a thing when VRA debuted. Except the dev team is trying to smuggle it in now. 
Topic: Top 6 Rare Metaverse Coins Under $0.6 (Read 229 times)
Yeah that's a good list but im feel so good caused by i didn't even have any intention to buy those when you're making this thread. The value of those tokens that you have mentioned above already decreased a lot. that being said that investing during the bearish market was the worst decision even you're having a good list of tokens to be invested. Just wait and see until the market becomes stable.
VRA was dumping so hard during the bearish market and it goes even lower from day to the another day. I thought that if this is the worst token as well.
VRA was dumping so hard during the bearish market and it goes even lower from day to the another day. I thought that if this is the worst token as well.
You can include another two new Metaverse project in this op, such as Itsmyne & CoPuppy those have really bright future and right now both of very low price in the last a couple of months. So i think good opportunity to buy for the long term. Still those looks pretty under rated coins
I'm watching WAX, METAHERO & VERASITY. not all metaverse tokens have great potential to provide investors with profits but I predict the three above will give me big profits if I buy at the current low price. I'm slowly buying the three metaverse tokens above.
legendary
Activity: 3010
Merit: 1028
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
These coins aren’t really rare because most of them already almost reaching near $1 billion market capitalization and already having name in metaverse market I think.
Like Bloktopia it's already quite famous among many of metaverses influencers and isn’t really that rare anymore.
Also just because the price of each coins is below $1 doesn’t mean it’s still cheap, you should take into account how much their total supplies are, even if a metaverse coin costs $100 each if the total supply is quite low I think it’s still worth investing.
Also, the partnership of the game with other metaverse games and also the quality of the metaverse itself is more important for long term investment, I’d prefer wilder world than most of these metaverse coins mentioned to be honest. VRA was not so good as you said that in your thread. BLOK is the only best coin from your list
Like Bloktopia it's already quite famous among many of metaverses influencers and isn’t really that rare anymore.
Also just because the price of each coins is below $1 doesn’t mean it’s still cheap, you should take into account how much their total supplies are, even if a metaverse coin costs $100 each if the total supply is quite low I think it’s still worth investing.
Also, the partnership of the game with other metaverse games and also the quality of the metaverse itself is more important for long term investment, I’d prefer wilder world than most of these metaverse coins mentioned to be honest. VRA was not so good as you said that in your thread. BLOK is the only best coin from your list
I am only familiar with Metahero and Alien Worlds. I get the idea of token investing instead of playing these games. Based on my experience, it's really one way to go with the metaverse projects hype. You just have to get into a decent price as you buy them and wait until they make you a profit depending on how much you're comfortable it had made. But when investors look for a cheaper price for another project, there goes the problem because of new projects risk that does rug pull.
Well said boss. In the end, we all looking for profits.
Thanks for the TIP mate , but i was looking really for metaverse project to enter investing so I will try looking on the list since they are very cheap to start with.
I may buy if find some of those being reputable project and worth trusting .
I may buy if find some of those being reputable project and worth trusting .
I am only familiar with Metahero and Alien Worlds. I get the idea of token investing instead of playing these games. Based on my experience, it's really one way to go with the metaverse projects hype. You just have to get into a decent price as you buy them and wait until they make you a profit depending on how much you're comfortable it had made. But when investors look for a cheaper price for another project, there goes the problem because of new projects risk that does rug pull.
Well said boss. In the end, we all looking for profits.
By the way how big is the market of Metaverse coins, is there any way to check it to see the full list?
Yes, these 2 sites are good references:
https://coinmarketcap.com/nft/
https://www.coingecko.com/en/nft
Another one, if you like to check some Metaverse that is already in trading action, you can check the Binance markets and there's a market tab specifically for it.
Looks like Metaverse is the new trend now, keep this thread up OP, I'll be following this, not only your list but on the coins that others may suggest. To be honest, I'm not quite familiar with these coins yet as I have not moved on from NFTs but I'm always looking for a great opportunity to make profit again.
By the way how big is the market of Metaverse coins, is there any way to check it to see the full list?
By the way how big is the market of Metaverse coins, is there any way to check it to see the full list?
I have only WAXP on the list with TLM as a side dish lol. Seems like a good choice for me as there are lots of Metaverse and DAPPS that use the WAX protocol.
Not hyping nor shilling the coin but just want to share my insights. The only problem I'm dealing with WAXP is the continuous high CPU usage problems with some of their DAPPs. That requires another round of staking of WAX to be able to continue using that specific DAPPs.
I think you took the token price incorrectly as a determinant. After all, whether the price is high or low depends on the total supply. The most important thing is the market cap, and all the projects you mentioned are very high. I think that projects with a low market cap, such as for example ARCONA ($11,5M market cap), have a much greater chance of increasing the price.
Sorry for asking.
How the list "Metaverse" coins is selected, one of example like "VRA" where the aspect this coin/token is Metaverse coin? there to many people using #Metaverse name just for the hype and their own benefit.
While comparing to the definition of #Metaverse, the project don't really about that.
How the list "Metaverse" coins is selected, one of example like "VRA" where the aspect this coin/token is Metaverse coin? there to many people using #Metaverse name just for the hype and their own benefit.
While comparing to the definition of #Metaverse, the project don't really about that.
The marketcap has a process of growing up. It can be triggered by a price hype and $0.6 seems affordable to some investors who want to test investing in metaverse projects.
"affordable"? "price hype"? How is the price have anything to do of being "affordable"? What's your reasoning on this? Like i said, price doesn't matter anything, so i guess we are stuck inside of somekind of conversation loop until you explain what you mean by this.
I don't care about price is under $0.6 or under any price because token price is not important. Marketcap is important because it will help us to know how much capital is needed to pump a token. Pumps can occur naturally or artificially but it needs capital flow to pump a price significantly.
Projects with marketcap under $10M is more easily to be pumped if they have good products and good marketing. With support from general bullish market, they will pump to the Moon easily.
About GameFi and Metaverse projects, their tokenomics and models of their game modes are important for their sustainability. If their models are unsustainable, their tokens will not be able to maintain price. Gamers will farm tokens by playing games and dump it on free market. Price will be decided by how much gamers dump.
Projects with marketcap under $10M is more easily to be pumped if they have good products and good marketing. With support from general bullish market, they will pump to the Moon easily.
About GameFi and Metaverse projects, their tokenomics and models of their game modes are important for their sustainability. If their models are unsustainable, their tokens will not be able to maintain price. Gamers will farm tokens by playing games and dump it on free market. Price will be decided by how much gamers dump.
Aside from the marketcap, one should also be aware on the capability of the team behind the project. Do you think the metaverse has strong development team? You will see a lot cheaper metaverse coins but will they survive in the long run? Price is just one of the factors to consider but for me, the main contributor of my decision is how they can implement those objectives into reality and be active in the market in order for them to survive long.
I don't think restricting yourself to token with a price less than $0.6 is a good idea. There is no point to that. As it has been said before, the marketcap and the % of the circulating supply (and the ongoing inflation) are much better indicators of valuation of a project. I don't know most of the projects, but some of them already had a major hype in spering this year (VRA). LEt's see if they can rise again
There are many popular Metaverse coins/tokens that price under $0.6 USD, you can see them on Coinmarketcap. The 6 coins you submitted are pretty good. I just want to add 1 new Metaverse project token which is supported by Alameda and Animoca Brands namely Upland, The price of tokens and land in Upland is still cheap, you can take advantage of this opportunity
I don't care about price is under $0.6 or under any price because token price is not important. Marketcap is important because it will help us to know how much capital is needed to pump a token. Pumps can occur naturally or artificially but it needs capital flow to pump a price significantly.
Projects with marketcap under $10M is more easily to be pumped if they have good products and good marketing. With support from general bullish market, they will pump to the Moon easily.
About GameFi and Metaverse projects, their tokenomics and models of their game modes are important for their sustainability. If their models are unsustainable, their tokens will not be able to maintain price. Gamers will farm tokens by playing games and dump it on free market. Price will be decided by how much gamers dump.
Projects with marketcap under $10M is more easily to be pumped if they have good products and good marketing. With support from general bullish market, they will pump to the Moon easily.
About GameFi and Metaverse projects, their tokenomics and models of their game modes are important for their sustainability. If their models are unsustainable, their tokens will not be able to maintain price. Gamers will farm tokens by playing games and dump it on free market. Price will be decided by how much gamers dump.
I personally don't think that any of these projects are going to survive long term.
Their valuations are simply way too inflated to be sustainable, and once this metaverse hype dies down they'll just be revealed as just another set of vapourware projects that used existing technology to hype up a buzzword.
Definitely not worth investing in anything other than Decentraland or Sandbox imo, stick with established metaverses since it's very hard to disrupt economies of scale in this area.
Their valuations are simply way too inflated to be sustainable, and once this metaverse hype dies down they'll just be revealed as just another set of vapourware projects that used existing technology to hype up a buzzword.
Definitely not worth investing in anything other than Decentraland or Sandbox imo, stick with established metaverses since it's very hard to disrupt economies of scale in this area.
I would even go as far to say as they would not survive in medium term. As soon as the entire hype falls away just as it did with ICOs and Defi shitcoins,,, the smaller projects (which is majority of everything available now) will simply have users lose interest or angry that price is not going up, and then the dumping will start.
meta vaporware indeed!
I personally don't think that any of these projects are going to survive long term.
Their valuations are simply way too inflated to be sustainable, and once this metaverse hype dies down they'll just be revealed as just another set of vapourware projects that used existing technology to hype up a buzzword.
Definitely not worth investing in anything other than Decentraland or Sandbox imo, stick with established metaverses since it's very hard to disrupt economies of scale in this area.
Their valuations are simply way too inflated to be sustainable, and once this metaverse hype dies down they'll just be revealed as just another set of vapourware projects that used existing technology to hype up a buzzword.
Definitely not worth investing in anything other than Decentraland or Sandbox imo, stick with established metaverses since it's very hard to disrupt economies of scale in this area.
Jump to: