Topic: Top 9 Trusted bounty campaign manager. (Read 890 times)

I agree with the OP, these are good at what they do and am fortunate enough to have had an opportunity to might have worked with all of the listed in the OP and hoping to work with the remaining lot,and out of curiosity how did you arrive at this list, what factors or parameters did you use and have you been part of all these guys campaigns???

My thoughts too, and looking at the names clearly these were cherry picked to get some sympathy merits  

Hope other upcoming managers aren't demoralized by this...

Respect all bounty managers who do wonderful work. Many projects cheat bounty hunters and fail to pay them. This is not the managers' fault.

I envy all those who have been to highest pedestal. Surly they are rock stars and successful in there domain.
I am more interested in knowing Irfan_Pk - how can we find out what campaigns he is managing - my apology in advance if someone find my question silly.

It's very important and it should be at the right time once there is an accusation the campaign should be paused and will only continue if the project is cleared of all the allegations, managers should not be too attached to one campaign, that they will defend it whatever the cost, only in house manager will do that, the manager should keep his reputation clean because the campaign managers competitions are very tough and there are only a few good campaigns to manage.

You're both right. However, it is better to assume that even the manager can make a mistake. Anyone who does their own research on projects knows very well that some projects are so well prepared that it is impossible to predict the bad intentions of the creators. Bounty manager is also not able to predict whether the project has a chance of success at all, that is, collecting minimal funds for development. In both of these cases, most bounty participants call the project a scam, which is a mistake if the project collapses. This means that a very large number of people participating in the campaigns do not even understand the basics of how it works. It is better to educate users than advise them to rely on the bounty manager's opinion.

No, manager cannot always know whether a project will end in a scam but managers should look into whether the developers or the company they work for are as responsible as they should be. In my opinion manager should do their best to find out. For example, a manager should stop a campaign when a red flag is detected, such as plagiarism in a white paper, and ask the project owner for an explanation.

In most cases, managers just do their job. But sometimes things go so badly wrong that the manager has no choice but to close the campaign. I have seen many good managers stop bad projects where the developer has committed serious errors.

Sorry, but I see this thread just as attempt to hunt merits. We already have mutliple threads dedicated to bounty managers, another one isn't needed probably. And no offence Op, but these huge images looks very bad. And I'm not sure by what criteria you rated managers from 1st to last.
And I'm not really sure that all people in your list manage bounties. Some of them probably working with Bitcoin paying campaigns, which shouldn't be considered as bounties IMO.

Completely agree with you. Manager is also responsible, at least partial. They should do their homework about project before accepting job. Offcourse, it's not always possible to know that project may become scam, so, manager don't have full responsibilty for these things.

But if the project is obviously a scam or there are pieces of evidence that the project is a scam the manager must act to stop the campaign, a good manager will not hesitate to do that and is not selfish even if he is going to get paid with tradeable coin,
If you're a bounty hunter you need to set criteria on the kind of project that you're joining, don't join for the sake of joining work smart not harder, you don't have to join everything you only have to pick the right one.

if you read the instructions as below.


Obviously, you don't need to trust any Bounty manager, participants and managers are both paid by the company you want to promote, the fault here is not the manager, but the company if they don't pay.

Conclusion: if you want to join the Bounty campaign, don't look at the manager, look at the team and company, every participant doesn't need to trust the manager all you need to believe is yourself sure to join, hesitate to back down, no one is forcing, everything is free.

you're partly right here, managers cannot be held responsible for what happens next with the project and its value of them. but they certainly bear part of the responsibility if they accept everything, without checking the potential of the project and whether it is really worth the effort.
In the end, managers are most often paid in dollars or bitcoin, hence they got their earnings. Who cares about bounty hunters.

At present I do not trust any manager. Because now a lot of good managers do bounty scams and they don't pay and if they make ten bounties they make one payment. So it looks like a much better manager. The new manager pays them something. So I think the manager will pay better now. Now the bounty is to get the payment and if there is no payment despite having a good manager If not given then what will happen with good manager.

I think it is beyond the control of any manager as to whatever happens to the future of the projects whose bounty campaigns they managed, unless they are also part of the development team itself. Whether those projects succeeded or failed to even reach a single exchange, they're not responsible for it. I am quite sure that all the mentioned reputable bounty managers have their fair share of failed projects. And they are not to be blamed, even though an amount of due diligence should be expected from these managers as soon as offers come up.

I took participated many campaigns handled by julerz12 but I don't get dollars (Though he distributed rewards) but all his campaigns rewards worthless or don't arrange any exchanges. But Yahoo sir , Hhampuz , Irfan pak, Cryptopremierbbrainbiass All time the best bounty campaign managers.

Way back before 2017 there are many campaigns give good profits to their participants and if you participate on various campaign you could provably earn a lot of money at that time, but for now I doubt it since campaign are not paying good so I guess making rich discussion upon joining those is not really possible at the moment.

I also like Hhampuz and yahoo since their experience to handle campaigns is what aspirant managers to look at and many people admire them for getting a lot of campaigns and the way they handle it.

Does bounty hunting make people rich? I don’t have an idea. I guess I have seen some people have abused the bounty & made some good amount of money. Otherwise, isn't the reward too low?

Personally, I like Yahoo & Hhampuz for their professionalism. I have seen them to manage a lot of campaigns & have never seen any issue either.

Personally I find that Yahoo doesn't seem to have much success in 2021 for the campaigns he manages, some of his campaigns are scam specific like VoltNFT - https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/voltnft-bounty-campaignended-5348687
But the one responsible for his role and I think he's a good guy.  He deserves a good signature campaign manager.

This is more a list managers, but definitely not a top of bounty managers. Let me throw my two cents. No offense please.

yahoo62278 - he is one of the best to manage signature campaign of gambling sites with payment in BTC. But he is not very lucky with token/coin campaigns.

irfan_pak10 - I have formed an opinion, that he was good or one of best in 2017-2020, or during ICO/IEO era. Now he rarely manages something, maybe few projects every quarter.

Bounty Detective - they were good someday, and are very popular. I think that have gained such popularity thanks to easy social media tasks. Do 5 retweets per week and that it. Who would have missed basically such "easy crypto" ?

CryptopreneurBrainboss - I have participated only in Bitvest, BTC based signature campaign. He is strict, but fair. Right now I see that he managed multiple "regular" bounty campaigns. Some of them looks interesting. Some... I dont believe these project will ever be demanding.

Royse777 - he is a new player on the field imho. Some campaigns under his management have distributed rewards, some are still pending, pending for a long time. He has a good reputation on the forum, but I think it is too early to make a conclusion what kind of bounty manager he is.

Hhumpuz - I can agree that he is a one of the trusted users and managers. He manages a lot of campaign. But there is a good % of scam among them. However, no one is insured against that.

Wapinter - he is similar to irfan_pak10 imho. Once he was on top, now he barely shows signs of life as a bounty manager.

joeperry - he friends with Peter Griffin. This is enough to be said about him. Joking. Well, my opinion that chance to get a reward in his bounty is greater than from a campaign managed by cooper member, newbie, jr. member or from "project representative". If you are missing "good old bounty times", join his campaigns. Better try luck there.

Julerz12 - I think in his campaigns, hunters have the highest percentage to get rewarded. However, it does not mean his campaigns will make you rich or you will earn "big money", a lot. The right words will be - you will get rewarded, you will be able to sell reward.

I would say, if these managers consider running signature campaigns with payment in BTC, I would consider joining it, as these campaigns wont end or be put on forever pause in 1-3 weeks. Speaking about token/coin campaigns - I simply dont believe in such bounties anymore.

I guess he didn't do a research nor have proper criteria to be called the best campaign managers and list is not proper order. So I guess irfan_pak is right here this thread created trying to farm some merits from those listed person or to the people who always fascinated with those guys. There's a list of trusted campaign managers already and to avoid any conflict of interest I guess that's enough and there's no need to create different thread just for it.

Not true. There is solid amount of campaigns under their management, that still havent distributed rewards, even since 2020. And their "follow news" or "wait for an update" is not a solution, but most frequent answer from admins. The best and hilarious part of bounty detective is that guarantee rewards and sometimes escrow funds, yet still wait for permission for distribution from project or wait for distribution fees from them.

You need to resize the images so that their size fits the topic, and you also need to reformat the topic.
I suggest you the following:

• Use this code, you can change width and height to make it better
  
  

• Learn more about posting images (with size adjustments), hyperlinks: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/guideline-on-posting-images-with-size-adjustments-hyperlinks-3974517
• [Tutorial] How to add image, resize image and make image clickable: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/tutorial-how-to-add-image-resize-image-and-make-image-clickable-2958771

---

Give them points (Stars) to have a neutral results > give each member a number of stars from one to five in the following levels:

• The number of campaigns he initiated.
• The money he secured.
• community assessment.
• Communication with clients.
• Fight fraud and low quality posts.
• Campaign Manager activity.
• trust.
• Negative ratings.