Topic: Top Bounty Managers in bitcointalk (Read 1988 times)

Thanks for the information, I notice also that our legendary bounty manager here is very strict and they have quality check on their participants, and very precise with the participant ranks, some manager has their own of management as well, well you should learn more of them as well before joining one of their campaign.

There is no doubt that yahoo is trusted by everyone for his valuable campaigns. I may missed many trusted managers in the list. So, I welcome  everyone to share their experiences with other trusted managers and it will be useful for others too.

1) Needmoney is also a part of TOKENSUITE team, their channel & website are already mentioned in the list. So I forget it, i can add it now.

2) ColorlessK is from Bountyhive.io platform. He is making announcements here and conducting all of his bounty in bountyhive platform, so I didn't added him in this list.

3) Deadley is recommended by few members here too, so I am collecting further information and will added in the list soon.


Further I am always welcome everyone to share your experiences with bounty managers, so that we can create a good list of BM/CM.

On that particular list you’ve made I only know one and I think they’re bunch of them that is not included (update it accordingly). I trust yahoo62278 on dealing with signature campaign and surprisingly with most bounty that he handled with no issues or less spammy than others.

And most of it have value and successful in the future.

Without intentional BS and most members do agree with me.

Please rephrase your title its misleading based on other comments they are not agree on your top list so better change the title to "my top bounty managers" I only agree on yahoo, sylon, and olcaytu2005 are one of the top here but others I cant say for now many more experienced and trusted managers are not listed like needmoney, colorlessK, deadley and many more..

Thanks for your appreciation and since I didn't participated in any bounties from Deadly, I don't know any experience and much details about him. If you know the details of his previous work for reference or he is having any group/channel to maintain his bounties, just share it here. I will look into that and added him in the list.

I love that bounty managers specially yahoo,but why you forget to put deadly he is also good manager by the way thank you for sharing that was helpul specially in newbies.It's pretty good to choose a nice and beautiful backround bounty managers for avoid scams.Amazix is strict now but it is for our good and for avoiding cheaters.thanks

I agree with you, the rank alone won't determines the credibility of a CM. Because see my above post about CRYPTOMAZE, even though the rank is Jr.Member, their 4 projects are 100% verified and that's what we want from a Bounty Manager. I saw here even higher ranked people have negative trusts, managing bounties and managed the scam project too. So, rather than only looking into higher rank, we have to support the CM/BM who bring us the verified ICOs and bounties here.

Crytomaze team are one of the professional handling the bounty campaigns from outside this btt, which means they mostly won't publish ANN/BOUNTY thread instead they asked the ICO team to create it and CRYPTOMAZE teams are the one managing the other tasks.

Their current projects running here are,

1) https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/1m-bounty-mvp-buddy-development-automation-platform-1m-bounty-4258059 (BUDDY) - ANN/BOUNTY thread created by BuddyHQ but its managed by CRYPTOMAZE team.
   BUDDY is verifed ICO by ICOBENCH

2) https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/bounty-arawtokenio-phase-1-completed-phase-2-500k-in-rewards-3602568 (ARAW) - ANN/BOUNTY thread created by Krutesh  but its managed by CRYPTOMAZE team.
   ARAW is verified ICO by ICOBENCH

3) https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/bountyairdroppre-ico-live-guarium-e-commerce-automation-huge-pool-3359820 (GAURIUM) - ANN thread created by Gaurium and BOUNTY thread created by CryptoMaze official and managed by CRYPTOMAZE team.
 GAURIUM is veriifed ICO by ICOBENCH

4) https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/ann-ico-viva-crowdfund-homes-invest-in-mortgages-globally-3430485 (VIVA) - ANN/BOUNTY thread created by VivaNetwork but its managed by CRYPTOMAZE team.
 VIVA is verified ICO by ICOBENCH

So there is no issues from the Cryptomaze team. They were not here to get higher rank or more, but they had well professional team. It doesn't matter as a individual CryptoMaze official is posting good quality post or not, their team is one of the best doing as BM.

I am always welcome the Sr members comments, but the only thing I don't like is  most of them are speaking about the Ranks without looking the quality/effort of their work. If you guys found any issues/scam by these bounty managers, I am ready to accept instead of commonly speaking about the ranks and all.

All the 4 bounty projects managed by CRYPTOMAZE teams are 100% verified. Without analysing their work and effort by them to get good bounty projects here, how come you simply mention this list sucks?

Yes, this thread is very helpful to many new member here who want to know who is the trusted manager in the bounty world, because its one thing that we need to know on how to choose a good bounty project.

Honestly, this list sucks. Who is this "CryptoMaze official"? A Jr. Member with a 3 months old account and campaigns full of spam and shitposts. If you can't bother to check the kind of users that those managers are accepting in their campaigns, then you shouldn't be making a list of "Top Bounty Managers".

I don’t think the rank determines the credibility of a CM, although it can be said that if he has a higher rank then he should have more experience. Handling the funds is just one of the many tasks of a CM and only the trusted and known ones by the community are able to distribute payments without an escrow. Giving out payments is not the only task of a CM and they may simply hire an escrow if there is doubt. I don’t think it’s the sole determiner of whether one is suitable to be a campaign manager. He should be competent enough to fulfill his other tasks such as picking out the participants and diligently checking the post counts regularly.

Thanks for this info, I would definitely check them out to see for myself.
Thumbs up mate!

Dude, they don't care there is even one on your list famous for not taking care of the posters activity. Most people know it, go to the Meta section to ask if you want. And when you read the forum it's clear they don't care.
Why do you think some people are fighting these spammers and some complaints about them

Let us assume that I was joking. As you said they were doing some maths and updating sheets were right. But on what basis you are saying that they were accepting spammers? They have enough mature to identify scammers and lot of peoples were rejected for not providing good quality posts.

Thanks for your valuable advice, as per your suggestion I removed the over-sided colored text. As you can see, TOKENSUITE, AMAZIX, CRYPTOMAZE are well known professionals and I added the references for their previous works (including their website). Even the other managers were also doing a fantastic job without any negative trusts so far.

Top... based on what? You must be joking?
There is/are one/some listed in your post that does/do nothing else than to help to make the mess in the forum. They don't care about the quality. They only know to post "accepted update your signature", to make google docs and add usernames and doing some maths at the end.
They accept spammer/shitposters and they're fine with it

I am really shocked that you were not aware of them,  because these managers are combinedly  running more than 50+ campaigns here.  This is not the list of escrow services, so I think no need to worry about trustworthy. As a managers, they were all doing a good job. Basically I had experienced with all of them except yahoo, but you were quoting based on your thoughts.

Thanks for your opinion. BTW I can't agree that only Sr member rank and above are capable of doing CM/BM. Personally I don't believe in trust score and all, because I saw that even sr member and above ranks are also had negative trust.  I doesn't put up any random campaign manager in this list, I participated in everyone's campaign except yahoo and checked everyone's performance based on their activity in the group, how they handling the issues, how they are managing the multiple campaigns etc for more than 3-5 months. That's why I added everyones group links and I can prove that I participated in everyones campaign.

I never heard their name here in the forum except for arteezy and yahoo.
Like bl4nkcode said don't include the full member on the list because full members is not trustworthy enough.
you can check this thread for reference https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/overview-of-bitcointalk-signature-anti-spam-campaign-managers-4412712