Topic: TOP69CryptoCasinos.com | Reviews & Listings - A more honest approach - page 2. (Read 589 times)

A new category with welcome offers was added: https://top69cryptocasinos.com/crypto-casinos-with-welcome-offers/

It will be easier for visitors to discover crypto casinos with 1st deposit bonuses or any other types of welcome offers.
It can be accessed from the top menu or homepage.

Thanks for your feedback, famososMuertos!

While I fully agree that a more personal touch (with personal testing, examples of deposits, withdrawals, reviews with personal opinions and conclusions) would make things more interesting for players, it wouldn't help them that much.

There are 2 reasons:
1. Most of the affiliate sites which are delivering such reviews = are lying. They either exagerate the positive things or they "forget" to mention the bad things. Overall, their reviews and rankings are artificial, so they can easily move brands up and down, depending on which brand pays more. On such sites you will find sections like "the best bitcoin casinos" - but without clear and objective arguments for why are those the best crypto casinos.
2. There are very few affiliate sites which are actually trying to test and review (for real) some crypto casinos in order to present their experience. However, the personal experience of one player is not relevant for everyone and shouldn't influence the decisions of other players.

I'll give you an example:

- KYC: All the licensed crypto casinos have to include KYC info into their Terms & Conditions because it's mandatory. This doesn't mean that every single player will get verified, but every single player which will trigger the casino's internal procedures will get verified at some point. It depends on the players wins/losses, amounts deposited/requested for withdrawal, betting patterns, stakes, games played (with various RTPs), IPs used, VPN used, country etc. Unless the casino clearly states that it will never request verification or personal details, whether a player gets verified or not is up to luck.


To maintain our independence and provide a more objective perspective than other affiliates, we've chosen this style of reviews, ratings, and rankings—focusing on facts. We're confident that some players will find this approach to be useful, especially as the number of listed brands will increase.

Hi,

There were made some improvements to the rating system. Here is the TOP69 Crypto Casinos Rating System.
Each visitor can now calculate and double check the rating of each listed brand. Everything is fully transparent.  

As I previously mentioned, the focus is solely on features and functionalities. Therefore, the only way for a crypto casino to rank higher on TOP69 Crypto Casinos is to simply deliver a platform packed with "goodies" for players: plenty of cryptocurrencies, many quick sign-in methods, NFT, welcome offer, rakeback, cashback, lucky wheel, chat, tips, rain drops, coin drops, VIP Club, wallet integration etc.


Since the rating system was improved, the rating was updated for all brands.
The no.1 brand now has 4.4 out of 5.
The no.2 brand now has 3.5 out of 5.
The last brand now has 1.8 out of 5.


PS: I know that some big brands are missing, but they'll be added pretty soon.

Welcome to the forum mate. I am wondering why you chose that specific name with 69 in it. Does it mean you are just going to review about 69 casinos and nothing more than that. 

Well website does look good and your review criteria is also pretty decent. I would these type of websites are really important because a review is must when it comes to financial investment. Mostly it is helpful to the new comers out there who end up investing money on the scam projects.

I think couple of days ago I encountered a thread where newbie was asking for help in choosing the best and legit casino for them to get started. I think that’s the correct peeps who need such threads and websites to be studied. Well done with the project hope it grows with the time and you make your reviews straight and trustworthy.

I think that the participation of any user who has a review casino is certainly promising for our betting board, as it increases the "competition" from other users who also have their projects running on bitcointalk.org.

Now, outside the bitcointalk niche, the fight is fierce to say the least, but here within the specific Gambling board, for now, as far as I know, there are two users who have here on the gambling forum/board yours ANN.

So, after a very quick review and based on what I know about these two sites, from those users, my position for you is number 3...

Why?

THE UX/UI of your site is good, with the extra rating of acceptable (3/5), the other two pages are good, with the extra rating of "very good" (3.5/5) and the other "excellent" (4.5/5).

The other advantageous point for the aforementioned position is that you do not play in the casinos that you promote, something that is perhaps the norm, that is,  out there, where thousands perhaps hundreds of thousands of pages swarm of referrals.

That is a priority, perhaps not for all casinos but in your top 5 casinos you should know them by you wager, from his own experience, that gives him credibility in a tough market where all the site owners want a click and only offer a reference link and information that I can read myself.

For example, you make a "non-KYC" list, but it is based on what you read on the site, you must try it, place a wager and then withdraw, you have to put "blood, sweat and tears" into it, like us, the real bettors, those who risk money for your link of referrals.

Finally welcome, 

I visited your site. I like the site very much. This is a very good site to get information about various casinos at a glance. I did not see any information about whether kyc is mandatory in every casino or whether there is any country restriction. I think this should be added.

Maybe op have not known very well the procedures of gambling, they gamble and also they whatever they wish for people or players to know the features of a particular casino, assuming op is not aware that it's casino need to Categories and give the details of each, it would have been better for safe explanatory towards its brand of casino, sometimes I think people works with casino because of the features that is involve in the casino, some people when casino lacks explanatory some players will dislike the casino, so I support your ideas

Same too. There are lots of big names here which I can not mention and it is such a surprise that OP had no knowledge of them. Maybe OP would take out time to do a proper research here to know more about this platform and casinos present here because there are lots of casinos not just casino but big names in the casino/gambling industry OP is missing alot. Maybe OP should just lick this thread for the interim to do his or her research properly because members might react to that list OP presented here and also their website too.

I share your opinion it's just a summary of what the casino is and its features OP did not mention if he deposit how his experience playing in the casino including deposit and withdrawal, what are the issues he faced, and what the best and bad features of the site based on his perception I have this feeling that OP just compiled it, other casino reviews present their reviews base don their experience, anyone can come up with a compilation of a casino features but depositing and playing and fully observing is different.
Anyway, every reviewer has their own style if this is how you present yours then so be it.

The overall site layout and structure is good one. Also, i like the presentation of the casinos and you can find the main features of each casino without going into the details. Also, there is a separate list of non-KYC casinos lists too. However, i disagree with the casino ratings presented on the site.


I was surprised to find out that there stake.com wasn't mentioned anywhere and not even in the list of top 50 casino list    I do not say that OP put stake on top of the list but not finding in the top 50 is a big surprise for me.

I saw the list and burst into laughter. Possibly OP is yet to get acclimatized with casinos here because from the list on the review site, I think members here would not give in to it or agree with OP to that effect. There are big names here on this platform which I see some of the above listed casino can not match in anyway.

Since OP is new here, I would suggest OP takes time to go through the casinos here and run a review on them or possibly do an open air view for members to list  casinos they want to see on the list then OP can from there do his or her review for casino to work on and add to the list based on the outcome result of the review.

So, what are your long-term business plan? I can understand that you are using affiliates income for your short-term goals and I think the decision to stop using that are dependent on how much income you will be getting from that. (I guess you are hoping to hook some whales)  

I think your approach to this are good.... transparency and fairness are the corner stone of every review site. Visitors can quickly pick up if your site are profit driven and not there for fair reviews.

No. There's no personal choice involved in ranking brands.

It will take a few days until the rating system will be published and you'll be able to clearly see the calculation for each published ranking. Also, the numbering of the ratings will be improved a little bit.


Someone said it's ironic for a review site to ask for reviews from players.
Well, my approach is the following: I'm interested on what you (the players) want and need. I don't want to display information that brands want or that most of you won't find useful.
I want to speak to you, read the feedback, try to improve where possible etc. I'm also open to criticism as long as it's constructive.

I have added 3 new categories: Rain Drops, Coin Drops and Tips.

You will be able to easily find all the crypto casinos with these features. These can be accessed via the homepage or the top menu.

Direct links below:
https://top69cryptocasinos.com/crypto-casinos-with-rain-drops/
https://top69cryptocasinos.com/crypto-casinos-with-tips-feature/
https://top69cryptocasinos.com/crypto-casinos-with-coin-drops/


Just so you know, I'm reading all of your comments and I'll try to reply to everyone as fast as possible.
I'm already working in regards to some suggestions you've sent. Of course, it will be impossible to make everyone happy, but I'll be doing my best to improve this website.

Thanks again!

I know you are using certain key measurements to evaluate the casinos but in the end the top casinos are based on your own personal choices?

The Top Casinos on your site are:-

1.  BC.Game
2.  Coins.game
3.  K8.io
4.  Rollbit
5:  Bitsler

I do not know if the other forum users will agree to this list or some other casino deserve to be in the top list  

I wished if the top list was created with the input from the gamblers as they are the ones who play and decide which casino they rate more than the others.

Hmm, no bad comment on this one, this is probably one of the best rating websites I've seen, very recommendable for others, I like how BC game and RollBit are on the list, all these casinos are top-notch, no complaints, and hands down.

The design of your website is very slick, good looking on mobile view too, and you don't need to add anything more, as I can see a comment asking to drop your user experience, I think that's not needed because it could complicate things, there is also no need to open door fot users to drop reviews, I think that will just get in the way of why this website existed.

The only thing that's missing is KYC requirement of each casinos, I think that should be available, because let's pretend if I am a newbie looking for a new casino, I won't know if they will ask for KYC verification straight up, I will have to find that out myself, it will be helpful if that's available on your website.

Cheers.

Of lately I have come across several casino review sites here and it just looks like there is a competition going on amongst the casino review sites as they are all justling for who has the best features  to be called a review site. Anyways it is all business as usual and the best takes it all.
OP you have a good website design and the numerous list of reviewed casinos are quite alright but I did not see any review links to check on them to see what other people are saying about them. If you can be able to do that it would be nice because having knowledge of what others experience about the casinos would be of great help mate. I think you should look into it.

Hey guys,

We have this section: NO KYC Crypto Casinos
As we'll continue adding new brands, the section will grow for sure.

How does it work:
We check FAQ, Terms & Conditions, pages with Rules or look for AML & KYC policies and Verification sections from the reviewed crypto casinos.

If we find Verification sections (where players have to input personal details or upload documents) + clear mentions that KYC is totally required at some point, we do not label a crypto casino as "NO KYC". We have noticed many casino review sites wrongfully labeling crypto casinos as "NO KYC" to mislead players and convince them to register.  




So far, we labeled only 7 crypto casinos as "NO KYC" and we want to do it as best as possible. That's why I ask for your opinion to make it as useful as possible.

Right now, we label "No KYC" based on the following criteria:
1. No verification section + No mentions of KYC procedures + A clear and visible statement from the crypto casino that verification/identity check is not required. This is the ideal case where players should not expect verification to happen: we found 5 crypto casinos in this scenario.

2. No verification section + No License info +  A statement that verification/identity check is not required under normal circumstances (but the crypto casino may request it if necessary). This is not the ideal case, there is still the possibility that the crypto casino may request KYC.
However, since there's no verification section + no license info, we tend to believe that the chances of this happening are very low. We found 2 crypto casinos in this scenario.


My question is: should we continue labelling crypto casinos from scenario no.2 as  "NO KYC" even if there's a small chance that KYC may be requested? Or should we label as "NO KYC" only brands from the 1st scenario which clearly state that they don't require identification?
What would be more useful for you?

Thanks!




LATED EDIT: we have included 2 separated lists on that page.
The 1st list includes brands which clearly state that they don't require verification.
The 2nd list includes brands with low chances of requesting KYC.
This will make things more clear, especially when checking each individual review. Hope it helps.

Thanks, Mate2237!

The reviews will definitely include more details, but not useless information that could make them too long.
Monetization will never be excluded. It will always exist in some way, either by using some affiliate links (no matter how bad the commissions are) or some other methods.
Would you take a job, start a project or a business if there was absolutely no chance of getting some sort of financial benefit, either now or in the future? Don't think so.



If by in-depth reviews you mean something like this: https://cryptonews.com/news/bc-game-review.htm
It will never happen.

We focus on quick wins, fast info & facts that people need to easily check in less than 1 minute. If you want to find out crypto casinos that accept Monero, our goal is to give you the longest list of crypto casinos accepting Monero (updated and real), in the easiest and fastest possible way.
We believe there's an audience for this type of content as well. Much lower, but there is.


As for good and bad casinos, I have one suggestion: don't use casinos based on what other people tell you on the internet, no matter how trustworthy they seem.

Gambling is risky, especially gambling on crypto casinos licensed in Curacao (which basically means nothing) or unlicensed. Literally all casinos can easily decide to block an account, stop paying, without delivering any reason. Players can't do anything. It's that simple. Google any "Brand name + scam" or "Brand name + stopped paying me" and tell me what you find.

If you want to be safe, play only on locally licensed casinos. If you encounter a problem, you can go to the authority issuing licenses, you make a complaint + deliver proofs, and in 99.9% of the cases there will be some sort of repercussions for the casino.
Want to be even safer? Then it's a good idea to stop gambling.

Well, you actuall no need to ask for that case.

All you need to do, just make a review depends on the situation you are asking. If you are get some situation like that, just write like the situation you are facing. I think you will get honest review, rather than contact them first.

Then, they tried to provided the best service because you want to review them.