Topic: Tornado Cash co founder at risk of getting jailed up to 45 years in prison (Read 202 times)

Agree, all ramsovare move they "profit" in sach mixers

no they are not
its not about being a developer..

seems even you have fallen into the social media trap..

the charges are not about being a coder..
the charges are about knowingly and directly facilitating and aiding criminals to do laundering and accepting payment for that direct involvement of facilitating laundering

the lame social media is trying to turn it into a story about developers to freak developers out. but it has nothing to do with developers
the charges are purely about conspiring to offer and facilitate laundering services, whilst also knowing the customers using the services are known sanctioned entities/criminals.

..

lets make things short and sweet
lets say that dave brad and ken are known criminals and have been using your service, and then authorities come along and inform you that these entities have been using your service, and the authorities warn you to do something or be treated as assiciates of criminal activity. you inform the authorities you will act on their information and do things to prevent further negative actions being inposed by authorities on yourself, informing authorities you will become compliant to evade you getting caught up in the mess.. however you then privately message your business partner to say your not going to effectuate anything that will prevent the laundering(though you could)
the crimes still continue and you then become associated with facilitating the crimes and knowing doing it because you have been previously been informed and warned, yet you continued to do it...

its got nothing to do with "just a dev" its about being informed and warned of particular customers, being warned that you need to become compliant to evade you being tied up in criminal charges.. and yet you pretend to be compliant whilst still allowing the criminal activity
and ontop of that taking a handsome income from facilitating the criminal activity even after the warning..

the indictments even from last year dont reveal all the evidence gathered by authorities but if you read through it with a clear un bias confirmed mind, with a fresh prospective you can garner enough information that its got nothing to do with "just a dev" and everything to do with continuing to facilitate crimes even after being warned, and also taking income from facilitating it, directly knowing that the income was coming from certain sources

there are many laws and regulations that if followed would have protected these guys from prosecution if they did follow through, but by ignoring the warnings and not following also got them another charge

I think what play games with usa low's is bad idea, Ofcause, this mixer was used to laundry dirty money. Tornado cash will be arrested sooner or later, bat will have big problem. Yes, tornado cash jast a boy from USSA village, but, government not be patient to this.

The future developers of privacy services need to be anonymous and lead a satoshi-type of a life to stay that way. That's, of course, an impossible dream to most people. Privacy services should be up and running for a few months and then disappear and go offline. The same people should then create a different service and work with that a few months. Law enforcement is slow and takes time. Once the government is set up and ready to act, the service disappears. Trusting such services and their honesty will be difficult, though.   

They are trying to give him the Ross Ulbricht treatment just for developing a mixer that they couldn't take down.

As has been said before, they are going to go after the developers of every single privacy service and try to wipe it off the internet. When? That is unknown, but you can safely assume that if whatever technology you are working on crosses the bad side of governments, then you're done for.

The way you put this together sounds funny to me,  if you create anything that can hide the information of the sender and the receiver wouldn't that make it a good option for money laundering? We don't like accepting the fact on this forum and I am not ready to prove anything to anyone but I will still stand my ground that the existence of mixers are a bigger threat to the safety of our countries.

This is just common sense, yes it is good for people who want to hide their tracks or have some privacy, but that's even if they are good people, so how will you tell if someone is good or bad in this case? Pretty hard isn't it.

This days almost everyone is a bad ass when it comes to money, people do crazy things this days and go to church on Sunday like nothing happened, we are in a world where criminals and killers will go to holy grounds to pray, like the audacity is disgusting as f***.

People are mostly bad, that's all I know, don't come to my face trying to play innocent, if people see ways to get away with crimes they will do it.

You can go and check the other community, the forum where all mixer signature campaigns are running, for sure you know this forum.

As for the number of years that the co-founder might get, doesn't make sense if you compare it to what SBF has done and yet he is getting less sentence and could be out in just a couple of years.

Maybe we can say that it's really different case, but the point is that SBF really did bad things, as compare to the Tornado cash developer who just faciliates everything and keep the basic tenant of being in crypto, that is being anonymous.

That's another thing but it's happening. 

Mixers and banks are quite different. Banks are regulated, while mixers are not. If banks were to allow money laundering, they’d face serious consequences since it's easier for investigators to trace fiat transactions. Plus, banks use systems that require approval from the central bank, making it much less likely for money laundering to slip through compared to unregulated mixers.

I guess you're right, Chipmixer's been operating for awhile before they got seize.

Governments can not beat all criminals down, and sometimes they cooperate with criminals too.

Sentence against criminals is real, not joke but how governments define crime and criminals is very confusing and unclear. I don't know about laws but if banks let money laundering happen on their services, will the founder be jailed 45 years?

I only heard that these banks will have to pay fined fees to governments, not serious jail time like 45 years.

Many mixers with anonymous teams but if they are not professional from beginning, their traces will leak their identity. Like ChipMixer's founder or team member was identified. You don't announce your identity does not mean you will never be found by governments.

Of course, criminals will never run out across the world, but that’s why the government keeps hunting them down. Sometimes, it makes you wonder if they’re just disrupting crypto, since they claim to find a money-laundering trail in a mixer, then go after the developers to put them in jail. The penalties aren’t a joke either; in this case, up to 45 years, which is basically a life sentence. There’s a reason why the mixer business is highly profitable, it’s also the most risky.

It might be possible to create a mixer with the same goal of anonymity, but not fully anonymous. Why not build a mixer with an anonymous developer? It's possible, right? That way, the mixer could continue to operate while leaving the government trying to figure out how to stop it.

The govs are trying to accomplish the impossible. As long as there are decentralized platforms and anonymous crypto currencies around, people can do whatever they like and nobody will know about it. Every once in a while the gov catches some guy to make an example of him but it is a small drop in the ocean of crypto. Just because they caught tornado cash dev, did money laundering stop? No, they figured out some other way instead of using tornado.

I don’t believe there is a fee for using Tornado Cash. The developers were funded by private investors, individual donors and also from the governance token they created. The only time users paid a fee was if they chose to use a relayer to withdraw their funds. The relayers were run by independent third parties, not the developers.

“They know what they are doing” can be said about other privacy projects. Monero is often characterized as being a tool intended to help facilitate criminal activity. Neither Monero nor Tornado Cash were created for those purposes. We can’t just start depriving people of privacy because there is a possibility that somebody who is considered by a government to be a bad person might benefit from it.


You can be the most murderous regime on the planet and nobody will go to jail or get sanctioned as long as you are a US ally. Politicians don’t get accused of bribery when Israel does the bribing. This is not law and order, it is hypocrisy.

This is the actual case;

And USA are not friends with North Korea....

As developers like Roman Storm and Roman Semenov have argued, Tornado Cash operates as an immutable smart contract. This means the creators themselves don’t have the ability to control how it's used or stop the platform, even if they wanted to. That being said, the key issue seems to be the claim that they knowingly profited from the proceeds of money laundering. This is where the legal trouble starts because the authorities are not simply prosecuting them for writing code but for knowingly benefiting from illegal activities facilitated through their platform.

To address this from a broader perspective: mixers are tools, and like any tool, they can be used for good or bad. However, when dealing with something like cryptocurrency, which governments are still learning to regulate, privacy tools are in a grey area, especially when used in ways that undermine the financial systems governments aim to protect.

Interestingly, there are ongoing efforts to support the legal defense of these developers. The WeWantJusticeDAO project has set up a Legal Defense Fund to support Tornado Cash developers Alexey Pertsev and Roman Storm, who are facing these legal battles.

You can check out the website for more details and to donate: wewantjusticedao.org.

It is offensive and annoying that some units of society do not understand the benefit that these people brought. There is no common vision of the whole picture. It will be funny if after some time such laws are repealed, and people have already suffered. A very "fair" state.

The most interesting thing is that paper money was also "laundered", and then suddenly crypto became guilty. Well, naturally, who else can be found to blame?

I opened the site using VPN:

Their pre-judgment might seem unfair, but they’ll never convict someone or an entity without evidence since that could backfire on them. In this case, they surely have evidence of money laundering happening on the platform founded by those individuals. It’s possible the founder wasn’t aware of the money laundering or is just playing dumb. But at the end of the day, solid evidence is what the court needs to convict and potentially lock them up for years.

This is tough and unfair but it's what government do with their power and they are free to interpret their Act, Laws. It is similar to forum admins, moderators as described in this rule.
Government does it more arbitrary than forum admins and moderators because they have more power and benefit to defend. This arrest like other arrests against mixers' founders are simply unfair, because if government does the same with other things like gun, knife, they will arrest many gun producers, knife producers with same reasons.

We have to ask, why do government apply double standard against mixers?

If anyone get problem with mixers in the forum, if theymos did not ban mixers here, it's theymos who is the head admin of bitcointalk forum. Campaign managers, campaign participants can have problems too but the head admin will be responsible firstly.

good argument, i totally agree with it..


He’s probably doing that, but as for the case, I just reported what he claimed. Well, they were aware of the reputation of mixers from the start, and it’s no secret that they attract money launderers, so it’s clear why regulators are keeping a close eye on them. Yet, he still chose to get into this business.

If his defense is honest, then it falls under "ignorance of the law excuses no one," and he could be facing a 45-year jail term. I’m not siding with the mixer, but I do see its value in promoting anonymity. However, the weakness lies in its potential use for money laundering, as this case and others have shown.

I'm curious though... has any mixer ever won a case against the government? If none have, then we might already know how this case will end.

Some exchanges I think is legal for gambling sites no idea how legal it is or lets just say it wasnt. But the difference is Government might have some permission on those exchanges while mixer doesnt. Why do you think its banned in forum? These are in grey area too but I believe they are more regulated than mixers.

Well in our country some gambling sites are actually owned by the government so somehow its regulated.

what if i told you that many 3letter-agencies put agents in sanctioned countries or regions states that require services to follow rules, adn the agents themselves perform these transactions and see if the service reacts or just performs the payments..
honeypot traps are a known thing.. even in the days of the NYbitlicence, there were NYC agents making payments to services without NYBitlicence and then charging them

but in regards the the tornado saga. the 'developer' done alot more then develop and was involved in alot more than coding, knowing what he was doing and taking a commission/fee from it is the crime.. not the coding part.

..
its like a person that makes suitcases, uses one of his own suitcases to transport a bomb, he knows there is a bomb in his suitcase and he is getting paid to transport it somewhere.. him then claiming he just made the suitcase does not dissolve the direct involvement of him being paid to transport a bomb.. trying to play ignorant that he just makes suitcases even when he got caught directly involved in facilitating a crime using his own invention wont help his case, he needs to concentrate on the actual charges not the social media stupidity pre-tense of "just a developer"

he needs to explain his income, source of income and his communication with customers wanting to use his particular service