OP log in today but he did not heed our advice to move this in the scam section, or lock this and create a thread for proper investigation, if he did not do what we ask him to do, then he is not serious on his accusation and Trubet accusation will stand that he is cheating by creating a multiple account, so far I cannot tell who is telling the truth.
Maybe OP just created this thread to actually get the attention of trubet and to get his withdrawal and now that it seems that it has been fix OP doesn't want to continue at all.
But I am reading their TOS and it seems that there is a restriction about 1 account so I don't understand why they would still send the money if they already know that OP was cheating?
From what I can tell. The user created multiple accounts and bet between themselves to accumulate a decent chunk. Then bet against a regular player on the website to legitimize his winnings and show "proof" that he won it fair and square. Regarding why they still processed the withdrawal, It could basically just be inexperience. They are new into the market and probably haven't faced similar situation before. They did learn from it and updated their terms so that, it isn't easy to abuse the giveaway anymore. This is a known problem for sportsbooks without KYC. Some people will do absolutely everything to abuse and take any advantage they find. You will se a ton "scam accusations" against reputable sportsbooks on bitcointalk that do not require KYC. Most of those cases are similar and as follows.
- User finds some exploitable bonus or loophole.
- creates multiple accounts to take advantage of the said loophole
- The Sportsbook detects unusual activity and blocks the account
- User creates scam accusation here on bitcointalk with proof and claim no wrongdoings from their side.
- Since there is no KYC, It becomes close to impossible(without giving crucial details about how their security flags users) for the casino/sportsbooks to prove that the user is abusing their system.
I am not saying that the sportsbook is never at fault but, I am saying that in a lot of these cases. Its the individual who is the culprit. Think about it, why would an already lucrative business try to con 1 random user and taint their image for what? 0.001 BTC?