Author

Topic: Trump would add twice as much to national debt as Harris, study finds (Read 53 times)

member
Activity: 182
Merit: 47
Personally ain't a fan of Trump but you really do have a thing for him.
Almost all your post are about the evil and atrocities he would cause neglecting what Harris would cause.


Trump's tariff plan is his campaign promise that he says over and over, not something anybody is making up about him. He actually things that racism is good for business, and he says so every single day, very proudly.

Quote

I believe the US picked the short straw in picking a Leader.
None Would be good for the economy especially in the long run but the citizens just have to pick the lesser evil.
I doubt anybody really knows who the lesser evil is.


Bitcoin went up 500% under president Biden, so maybe "nobody" knows, but.. the market sure does Smiley. You can't rationally predict doom and gloom like that when the immediate facts contradict it. And I'm not the one saying Democrats will kill Bitcoin, Republicans are. If you believe the US president doesn't matter, then you can't also say that Harris will somehow matter.

And economically, all of these horrible things that Republicans say will happen under Harris should be happening right now, but... they aren't: the US economy is extremely strong right now. And everything Harris is proposing today is what normal Republicans would have proposed 15 years ago before Trump took over the party. She says she wants to create an "opportunity economy"--which is exactly what George Bush said he wanted. Maybe that's why so many prominent Republicans are endorsing Harris now...




sr. member
Activity: 420
Merit: 315
Top Crypto Casino
Personally ain't a fan of Trump but you really do have a thing for him.
Almost all your post are about the evil and atrocities he would cause neglecting what Harris would cause.
I believe the US picked the short straw in picking a Leader.
None Would be good for the economy especially in the long run but the citizens just have to pick the lesser evil.
I doubt anybody really knows who the lesser evil is.


I think people would take your political view more if you are not blatantly showing bias towards a candidate.

Quote
There is only one candidate running in the US that will keep the price of Bitcoin moving upward, and she belongs to the same party that say Bitcoin increase by 500% in the last four years: Harris.
Their administration didn't help Bitcoin price to rise
Circumstances and events made the world see the flaw of Fiat and the benefit of Bitcoin.
So not a valid argument
Is like saying Bitcoin survived because of Barrack Obama rule.
member
Activity: 182
Merit: 47

Obviously Kamala would be a disaster for this country economically. The study probably relies on her hiking taxes a crazy amount, [...]


Harris has not proposed any new taxes on anybody with less than $100 million.

Trump has promised to raise taxes massively on every single American regardless of income.

Regardless, the pro-Trump mods have buried this topic as far down as one could possibly imagine, so I guess the discussion is over Smiley.

legendary
Activity: 4256
Merit: 8551
'The right to privacy matters'
Pick A 1 bucket of shit
Pick B 1 bucket of diarrhea.

Either  one stinks.

My hope for us all is this.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K6iF5sINVns
donator
Activity: 4760
Merit: 4323
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
Who paid for the study? LOL

Obviously Kamala would be a disaster for this country economically. The study probably relies on her hiking taxes a crazy amount, which will result in the long term weakening of the country as all our successful people and businesses flee to more friendly environments. Not to mention Trump would increase the debt helping Americans and American businesses. Harris would increase the debt to house illegal aliens and provide them with far more than we ever provided our homeless veterans in an attempt to control the voter base of this country for generations.
sr. member
Activity: 658
Merit: 321
Guy A is going to be twice as bad as Guy B.

How about just skip casting your vote and prepare to campaign to the winner, whoever it will be, to keep doing things that will reduce the debt growth (I don't even want to say eliminate, just make it less and less unsustainable). It really is sad, not just in the US, we're all about choosing the lesser evil.

This is a problem that so many countries around the world are facing. The political parties don't care about bringing good leaders to represent them, they look for good politicians. People who can win votes and it's making the counties get worse.
I still do not understand why people keep falling for this. A person may be a good politician and a very horrible leader. Politics is different from leadership. A good politician will say the right things, do the right things and meet with the right people to get elected, but when elected, they won't do the right things to make life better for the people and the country. It's not looking good at all. In every election, voters have no choice but to choose the lesser evil.

I blame the party members for this. They have a choice to reject a candidate if they feel that candidate is not fit to rule, but they don't because as long as the candidate is fit to win the election, they don't care. They just want their party to win.
legendary
Activity: 2912
Merit: 3603
Join the world-leading crypto sportsbook NOW!
Guy A is going to be twice as bad as Guy B.

How about just skip casting your vote and prepare to campaign to the winner, whoever it will be, to keep doing things that will reduce the debt growth (I don't even want to say eliminate, just make it less and less unsustainable). It really is sad, not just in the US, we're all about choosing the lesser evil.

P.S. Don't the maxis want USD to die and hasten the Messianic rise of Bitcoin?
member
Activity: 182
Merit: 47
Here is some important news that could drastically affect the price of Bitcoin:

https://www.washingtonpost.com/business/2024/10/07/trump-harris-national-debt/

If you are actually concerned about the US national debt and fiscal deficits, then the only rational choice for president this election is Harris.

Trump promises to devastate the US economy by imposing gigantic tariffs on all US goods coming from abroad. This will instantly increase prices for all US consumers (far more than the COVID-related inflation we saw last year), and make the US far less competitive in the long run, forcing companies to leave for countries that don't have these tariffs.

Tariffs are stupid economic policy, but they are rooted in the vile racism that Trump makes a centerpiece of his campaign.

And along with tariffs, Trump has promised to enact the largest deportation of individuals ever perpetrated by a government, rounding up 11 million individuals and sending them to countries that most of them haven't lived in decades or more. This will be a big chunk of the US workforce, and in particular one of the most important because it will hit specific industries like agriculture (price of food will go up), construction (price of housing will go up), and hospitality (restaurants and hotels). And of course, this will require a massive expansion of the US Federal government in order to carry out this operation, which will raise taxes and put even more pressure on inflation.

And of course, with 11 million workers suddenly missing from the US, inflation will be rampant as companies will need to scramble to back-fill millions of positions, pulling workers from other industries.

All of this is a recipe for an economic collapse in the USA, and in such a collapse, individual investors will need to liquidate their investments in markets in order to pay the bills--which means massive liquidations of Bitcoin holdings, e.g. the price will drop like a rock.

There is only one candidate running in the US that will keep the price of Bitcoin moving upward, and she belongs to the same party that say Bitcoin increase by 500% in the last four years: Harris.

Jump to: