I know that MZ currently is inactive and I just hope he comes back soon and pays his debts. Since I've used him as a escrow thrice, I know he is trustworthy and the loan debt is not a big amount for which he needs to scam anyone.
I can understand that it's unprofessional when one misses the payment timeline even though he is trustworthy as even I am also owed an amount from another veteran member and am waiting for him also to come back and pay me.
Topic: Trust Rating of Muhammed Zakir... (Read 1635 times)
Feedback is there as a warning and it is valid especially when all we have is your word currently. I would expect to receive feedback myself if I was in a similar situation but once he returns and settles it I'm sure it will be removed or turned to neutral.
Thanks, wasn't knowing it wouldn't help him to at least not get any more negatives from more people unless he comes back and gives some explanation of the situation he suffered from or is still suffering...
I just did this because I wanted to let everyone know that he's still here and will be back for sure, nothing else is all I asked...
global moderator
Activity: 3990
Merit: 2717
Join the world-leading crypto sportsbook NOW!
Feedback is there as a warning and it is valid especially when all we have is your word currently. I would expect to receive feedback myself if I was in a similar situation but once he returns and settles it I'm sure it will be removed or turned to neutral.
So what was happened to the user 'Muhammed Zakir' (I didn't read all the posts, sorry) ?
-snip-
It's not like that...
I just wanted everyone here to know that he's still here and will be back, he's in some problems but will be here for sure...
Everyone was thinking he ran away, which is why I vouched for him to let everyone know that he will come back...
I did this to at least let everyone know that he's in contact with someone who's on this forum yet...
Some people think my reputation isn't anything, but I would just say that no one would put their own reputation on stake for someone, unless he/she is so sure that the person is trustworthy...
(Not for you, redsn0w) Come on, I have also given two years to the community, so don't say that my rep isn't anything here...
to avoid further abuse (7 december) he not got more negative feedback and It was almost forgotten..
So what was happened to the user 'Muhammed Zakir' (I didn't read all the posts, sorry) ?
Nothing happened to him, friend...
It's just that he defaulted on a loan and everyone's thinking that he turned out to be a scammer, which is why I tried on his behalf to let everyone know that he is out of internet currently, and will be back in few days to answer everyone here...
So what is the problem? If he is honest (and he's honest) ... he'll repay the loan once he'll be back.
Who cares if someone think he's a scammer ?
It's not like that...
I just wanted everyone here to know that he's still here and will be back, he's in some problems but will be here for sure...
Everyone was thinking he ran away, which is why I vouched for him to let everyone know that he will come back...
I did this to at least let everyone know that he's in contact with someone who's on this forum yet...
Some people think my reputation isn't anything, but I would just say that no one would put their own reputation on stake for someone, unless he/she is so sure that the person is trustworthy...
(Not for you, redsn0w) Come on, I have also given two years to the community, so don't say that my rep isn't anything here...
So what was happened to the user 'Muhammed Zakir' (I didn't read all the posts, sorry) ?
Nothing happened to him, friend...
It's just that he defaulted on a loan and everyone's thinking that he turned out to be a scammer, which is why I tried on his behalf to let everyone know that he is out of internet currently, and will be back in few days to answer everyone here...
So what is the problem? If he is honest (and he's honest) ... he'll repay the loan once he'll be back.
Who cares if someone think he's a scammer ?
Well we'll be hearing from him when he comes back. I seriously doubt that anyone will be left without internet access for 2 months straight, with an outstanding loan.
Dude, we are community and here to help everyone, so I vouched for him...
If you are vouching for him, then you might as well pay his debts then he can repay you directly. There is no reason why others should not be warned that MZ is in default of loans/obligations until such loans/obligations are resolved. Just because MZ is located in the area of some kind of disaster does not mean that him not taking care of his obligations makes it safe to deal with MZ.
With that being said, once MZ resolves his loans/obligations, then there is no reason (IMO) that such warnings should be turned into neutral ratings and/or removed altogether.
Above all, I do hope that MZ is okay.
Kind Regards
Panthers52
Even I hope that he is fine, and I never asked anyone to remove negative trust rating but to wait, and I made this thread so that he might not get more negatives unless he gets a chance to prove himself completely after a comeback...
Dude, we are community and here to help everyone, so I vouched for him...
If you are vouching for him, then you might as well pay his debts then he can repay you directly. There is no reason why others should not be warned that MZ is in default of loans/obligations until such loans/obligations are resolved. Just because MZ is located in the area of some kind of disaster does not mean that him not taking care of his obligations makes it safe to deal with MZ.
With that being said, once MZ resolves his loans/obligations, then there is no reason (IMO) that such warnings should be turned into neutral ratings and/or removed altogether.
Above all, I do hope that MZ is okay.
Kind Regards
Panthers52
So what was happened to the user 'Muhammed Zakir' (I didn't read all the posts, sorry) ?
Nothing happened to him, friend...
It's just that he defaulted on a loan and everyone's thinking that he turned out to be a scammer, which is why I tried on his behalf to let everyone know that he is out of internet currently, and will be back in few days to answer everyone here...
Dude let it go for now, it's not your problem and MZ can take care of his problem whenever he comes back. You can vouch for him till you're blue in the face but that doesn't address the reason why that trust was left.
One more thing: "ain't" is not a word and it you keep using it, and it makes you sound like you're trying really hard to sound like what you think a native English speaker sounds like. But it just sounds ghetto.
One more thing: "ain't" is not a word and it you keep using it, and it makes you sound like you're trying really hard to sound like what you think a native English speaker sounds like. But it just sounds ghetto.
Dude, we are community and here to help everyone, so I vouched for him...
One more thing: I "ain't" speaking native English, neither am I trying any hard to speak the same, I know my words and you don't need to teach me as I "ain't" here to learn English, but to vouch for somebody...
Ain't stands for is not, am not, are not, etc... So, just put it the way you feel which is right at which place, but don't teach me...
I have myself been a professor in a Tuition Class for English subject for a year, so please don't bother correcting me, instead talk on-topic things...
Just because I am from India doesn't mean you could insult anyone showing you know more than us... I "ain't" saying I know more than you, instead I respect you, but let's talk what we are here for, instead of teaching each other "NATIVE ENGLISH"...
Neither am I here to insult anyone, dear...
I am a very good friend of MZ, and you can say I know him personally, which is why I am vouching for that person...
I am praying that he's all well wherever he is, and I do know that he can resolve his issue on his own, but unless he comes, I thought everyone should know that he's in contact with someone on the forum...
And sorry if "ain't" was a mistake...
Dude let it go for now, it's not your problem and MZ can take care of his problem whenever he comes back. You can vouch for him till you're blue in the face but that doesn't address the reason why that trust was left.
One more thing: "ain't" is not a word and it you keep using it, and it makes you sound like you're trying really hard to sound like what you think a native English speaker sounds like. But it just sounds ghetto.
One more thing: "ain't" is not a word and it you keep using it, and it makes you sound like you're trying really hard to sound like what you think a native English speaker sounds like. But it just sounds ghetto.
Dude, we are community and here to help everyone, so I vouched for him...
One more thing: I "ain't" speaking native English, neither am I trying any hard to speak the same, I know my words and you don't need to teach me as I "ain't" here to learn English, but to vouch for somebody...
Ain't stands for is not, am not, are not, etc... So, just put it the way you feel which is right at which place, but don't teach me...
I have myself been a professor in a Tuition Class for English subject for a year, so please don't bother correcting me, instead talk on-topic things...
Just because I am from India doesn't mean you could insult anyone showing you know more than us... I "ain't" saying I know more than you, instead I respect you, but let's talk what we are here for, instead of teaching each other "NATIVE ENGLISH"...
So what was happened to the user 'Muhammed Zakir' (I didn't read all the posts, sorry) ?
Dude let it go for now, it's not your problem and MZ can take care of his problem whenever he comes back. You can vouch for him till you're blue in the face but that doesn't address the reason why that trust was left.
One more thing: "ain't" is not a word and it you keep using it, and it makes you sound like you're trying really hard to sound like what you think a native English speaker sounds like. But it just sounds ghetto.
One more thing: "ain't" is not a word and it you keep using it, and it makes you sound like you're trying really hard to sound like what you think a native English speaker sounds like. But it just sounds ghetto.
Dude, we are community and here to help everyone, so I vouched for him...
One more thing: I "ain't" speaking native English, neither am I trying any hard to speak the same, I know my words and you don't need to teach me as I "ain't" here to learn English, but to vouch for somebody...
Ain't stands for is not, am not, are not, etc... So, just put it the way you feel which is right at which place, but don't teach me...
I have myself been a professor in a Tuition Class for English subject for a year, so please don't bother correcting me, instead talk on-topic things...
Just because I am from India doesn't mean you could insult anyone showing you know more than us... I "ain't" saying I know more than you, instead I respect you, but let's talk what we are here for, instead of teaching each other "NATIVE ENGLISH"...
but I see no reason to remove a negative trust from somebody who ripped off 0.16 BTC from someone else. He's had plenty of time to prove himself, negative trusts were first up on December 6th, and he logged in on December 11th. He could have explained his situation then but didn't bother to do so.
I don't understand why someone like him would scam a tiny amount, 0.16 btc? He could earn more by selling his account or even by waiting for a big offer.. Better to wait for a good answer from him
and I agree like said above, If he is not able to come back, what is the difference with as noted in its account.
He is able, and will come back for sure, that's the only thing I am trying to explain to everyone here...
but I see no reason to remove a negative trust from somebody who ripped off 0.16 BTC from someone else. He's had plenty of time to prove himself, negative trusts were first up on December 6th, and he logged in on December 11th. He could have explained his situation then but didn't bother to do so.
I don't understand why someone like him would scam a tiny amount, 0.16 btc? He could earn more by selling his account or even by waiting for a big offer.. Better to wait for a good answer from him
As said everywhere here, he ain't a scammer at all...
He's having some real life problems which he is currently dealing with, and come on guys, we all have a real life, and Bitcoins are a part of it...
Let's not make it this complicated for him, he will come for sure as he promised me he will be back soon on the forum, so I am vouching for him...
I can even put my own reputation on stake for that guy, I mean that if he scams for such an amount, I would urge everyone whoever has given him red mark, can give me red marks too for vouching for him (ONLY IF HE SCAMS, AND I KNOW IT WON'T HAPPEN EVER)...
Your reputation is worth little. Cough up the bitcoins on mz's behalf if you want the negative trust removed.
In any case, negative trust when he is not accessing the forum shouldn't be a problem.
As everyone's asking me to repay on his behalf, I would only say that I am myself dealing with some real life problems as I lost my father, and I really don't have coins, instead I wouldn't even think and just repay on his behalf and get his trust removed...
If he's currently having problems such as floods washing his house away I doubt his negative trust is a big worry. Like mexxer said, once he repays that loan, my negative trust will turn into a neutral, but I see no reason to remove a negative trust from somebody who ripped off 0.16 BTC from someone else. He's had plenty of time to prove himself, negative trusts were first up on December 6th, and he logged in on December 11th. He could have explained his situation then but didn't bother to do so.
Don't worry, please check his address 1MZakirz92c76pK6BNy1NAEmbWYpDcP7mh
He's already having BTC0.16 in his address, so it really ain't hard for him to repay that amount...
so the more you help save his reputation.
but I see no reason to remove a negative trust from somebody who ripped off 0.16 BTC from someone else. He's had plenty of time to prove himself, negative trusts were first up on December 6th, and he logged in on December 11th. He could have explained his situation then but didn't bother to do so.
I don't understand why someone like him would scam a tiny amount, 0.16 btc? He could earn more by selling his account or even by waiting for a big offer.. Better to wait for a good answer from him
As said everywhere here, he ain't a scammer at all...
He's having some real life problems which he is currently dealing with, and come on guys, we all have a real life, and Bitcoins are a part of it...
Let's not make it this complicated for him, he will come for sure as he promised me he will be back soon on the forum, so I am vouching for him...
I can even put my own reputation on stake for that guy, I mean that if he scams for such an amount, I would urge everyone whoever has given him red mark, can give me red marks too for vouching for him (ONLY IF HE SCAMS, AND I KNOW IT WON'T HAPPEN EVER)...
One more thing: "ain't" is not a word and it you keep using it, and it makes you sound like you're trying really hard to sound like what you think a native English speaker sounds like. But it just sounds ghetto.
but I have seen some people talking real bullshit in his trust rating like "dickhead", "motherfucker" and other slang words...
You mean trolls who he has learned to ignore right?You were, but I am currently worried after knowing he's in problems...
Edit: Only reason I haven't given a negative myself is because I still believe in him
Edit 2: Kerela, where he currently lives(as he has inserted in his profile) doesn't seem to have any flood recently(correct me if I am wrong). Where exactly is he currently(if you can tell that is)
but I see no reason to remove a negative trust from somebody who ripped off 0.16 BTC from someone else. He's had plenty of time to prove himself, negative trusts were first up on December 6th, and he logged in on December 11th. He could have explained his situation then but didn't bother to do so.
I don't understand why someone like him would scam a tiny amount, 0.16 btc? He could earn more by selling his account or even by waiting for a big offer.. Better to wait for a good answer from him
As said everywhere here, he ain't a scammer at all...
He's having some real life problems which he is currently dealing with, and come on guys, we all have a real life, and Bitcoins are a part of it...
Let's not make it this complicated for him, he will come for sure as he promised me he will be back soon on the forum, so I am vouching for him...
I can even put my own reputation on stake for that guy, I mean that if he scams for such an amount, I would urge everyone whoever has given him red mark, can give me red marks too for vouching for him (ONLY IF HE SCAMS, AND I KNOW IT WON'T HAPPEN EVER)...
Your reputation is worth little. Cough up the bitcoins on mz's behalf if you want the negative trust removed.
In any case, negative trust when he is not accessing the forum shouldn't be a problem.
Jump to: