Pages:
Author

Topic: Trust Summary and Shadow banning - page 2. (Read 368 times)

hero member
Activity: 1120
Merit: 554
🇵🇭
June 03, 2024, 10:42:57 AM
#5
This is really funny. Feedback by nature should not have ACLs. This system promotes cheating since people can privately agree to add each other (or pay someone with a higher level) and gain powers. Also the system is way too convoluted and unfair towards Newbies and Coppers. Anyone with powers can stick a 'scammer' sticker on a newbie and the world would think so as well, they have no opportunity to clarify it, they would leave a review thinking that the world can read it, but they would be ignorant of the truth. The system should atleast make it clear that although they are leaving a counter review, it won't be visible to anyone except them.

The system is designed fairly so that you will only get power here by proving first how reputable you are through good deeds and multiple successful transactions with other user with proof.

Vod attached reference on his tag to you which is valid. His DT power can be easily removed once he show an abused by excluding him to the trust list of the other DT. Forum DT works perfectly on anonymous environment like Bitcointalk. It’s not unfair with newbie, If you don’t want to get tagged then don’t do shady things like what you did because it’s an obvious fake feedback for your service.

You can request to remove the negative feedback to the user that gives it to you by admitting your mistake and don’t do it again. But it needs time for Vod to rethink about it.
jr. member
Activity: 47
Merit: 1
June 03, 2024, 10:32:19 AM
#4


This is really funny. Feedback by nature should not have ACLs. This system promotes cheating since people can privately agree to add each other (or pay someone with a higher level) and gain powers. Also the system is way too convoluted and unfair towards Newbies and Coppers. Anyone with powers can stick a 'scammer' sticker on a newbie and the world would think so as well, they have no opportunity to clarify it, they would leave a review thinking that the world can read it, but they would be ignorant of the truth. The system should atleast make it clear that although they are leaving a counter review, it won't be visible to anyone except them.

Quote
It's fair since each users can include and exclude any users, now the question is how many users are going to trust you over him?
No this is not fair since a new user who has never interacted with either me or the person who left a negative review can only see their review, not mine! So no, this is unfair. Also, So to answer your question, ofcourse users are going to believe them since my part has been silenced systematically!
hero member
Activity: 742
Merit: 633
June 03, 2024, 09:04:53 AM
#3
It's not the Legendary users have a power to hide your feedback, it's the system.

The reason why your feedback not visible to everyone is because you're not a DT, while he's a DT, read [Explained] How DT system works.

If someone include you in their trust list, they can see your feedback visible even you're not a DT... and if they distrust the user who left feedback in your account, they will not see that Legendary user feedback in your account.

It's fair since each users can include and exclude any users, now the question is how many users are going to trust you over him? Huh
legendary
Activity: 1064
Merit: 1298
Lightning network is good with small amount of BTC
June 03, 2024, 09:00:56 AM
#2
If you want to leave a trust feedback on someone's Bitcointalk account and you want it to appear so that everyone can see it, you will need to be in DT1 or DT2.  If someone or more people in DT1 add you to his or their trust list, you will become DT2. Only theymos can put you in DT1.
jr. member
Activity: 47
Merit: 1
June 03, 2024, 08:55:32 AM
#1
I have a question regarding trust summaries and feedback. I have interacted with many users here and they would vouch for having a positive experience with me and not a single one of them would claim me being a scammer. Still,  a crazy, mental user with a 'Legendary' status who has never ever worked on any project with me ever has left me a negative trust review. Thisis visible to every user on bitcointalk and potentially hurting my image, however, when I leave a counter, a negative feedback towards them with an explanation about him, it is not visible to the world. How is this fair? Is bitcointalk shadow banning people's reviews or do people of Legendary status have some special powers to hide it, which we don't? Why is sh17 written about me visible to the world but when I provide a clarification and write sh17 about that liar, it isn't? How is this fair?   Huh
Pages:
Jump to: