Trust: The New Rank requirement? | Bitcointalksearch.org

El duderino_

legendary

Activity: 2492

Merit: 11937

BTC + Crossfit, living life.

Quote from: o_e_l_e_o on April 17, 2019, 06:45:10 AM

Requiring positive trust to rank up will completely ruin the trust system. People will make tiny irrelevant trades and take out tiny loans they don't need just to build trust. People will leave frivolous ratings for their friends or trade trust between themselves. Some users will inevitably try to buy and sell trust. There would be loads of issues that needed addressing, such as deranking users if their positive trust is removed, or they gain more negative than positive trust.

Merit is for ranking, and trust is for, well, trust. Trying to combine the two would make both systems worse as well as being a total headache.

I also don't see trust needed to rank up, @this time the people who buy and sells on the forum have build a kind of community and knows of each other who's to deal with and when to take precautionary measures before dealing with.... as o_e_l_e_o says and everybody is making tiny trades and giving good trust comments on friends, then the trust system will become unreliable, activity is the main factor in ranking up... only when your really dedicated as a new member you will reach high activity combined with merit to become legendary so even higher will be very tuff as a new member.

o_e_l_e_o

legendary

Activity: 2268

Merit: 18509

Requiring positive trust to rank up will completely ruin the trust system. People will make tiny irrelevant trades and take out tiny loans they don't need just to build trust. People will leave frivolous ratings for their friends or trade trust between themselves. Some users will inevitably try to buy and sell trust. There would be loads of issues that needed addressing, such as deranking users if their positive trust is removed, or they gain more negative than positive trust.

Merit is for ranking, and trust is for, well, trust. Trying to combine the two would make both systems worse as well as being a total headache.

slocker

full member

Activity: 490

Merit: 134

Trust to be included this this will be little much overrated. Isnt trust for trade purpose, or for some job here done. Merit is received for constructive or funny in topic post if im not mistaken then why would it be necessary to have trust. Isnt trust for members who want to be in DT table. But if this is necessary this could easily be again be manipulated like in the beginning of merit system. Many will try to sell at start or trade for it. Im not that high in rank and dont know if this is good or not but again its no for me to decide only to say my opinion like many of you. But everything new have good and bad sides maybe this will be like this or it will never be implemented at all.

samputin

sr. member

Activity: 1036

Merit: 294

Quote from: Mpamaegbu on April 16, 2019, 03:13:29 AM

I foresee a situation where the Trust score will begin to serve as the new requirement for members to rank up. Honestly, Theymos could be harbouring this thought. It's over a year now since the sMerit system was instituted and his silence so far in creating another level after the "Legendary" rank portends something, I should think. What do you guys think?

Trust score as the new requirement to rank up seems too much. Merit is still doing fine. It still keeps spammers and shitposters from ranking up. And Trust is hard to gain here somehow. Just look at the accusations that suddenly pop up. What would be your criteria for giving someone a Trust score? I just can't imagine it happening right now. At least, in merit system, you would know if the post is of good quality and informative enough to deserve merit since we are only talking about the post alone. Maybe another rank after Legendary is more acceptable. But a new requirement? I don't think so.

stompix

legendary

Activity: 2828

Merit: 6108

Jambler.io

Quote from: lobcmt2 on April 16, 2019, 09:20:14 AM

For now, maybe old generation of Legendary have reason to keep their ranks, but if we look at 10 years later, it will be ridiculous if 10 years after merit system born, they won't earn a single merit and still be a Legendary.
Why only demoted to Hero?
I suggest to have auto-demotion over time.
For example:
4 years after merit system's birthday, if a Legendary won't earn enough 500 merits, account will be demoted to Hero.
6 years after, if a Legendary won't earn enough 250 merits, account will be demoted to Senior Member.
8 years later, a Legendary won't earn enough 100 merits, account will be demoted to Full Member.

I've always said that merit decay should be introduced, maybe not that drastic cut and maybe just based on activity periods as it would be unfair for someone who has been off the board for 8 months to be next to those who have made 2000 bounty posts in that period.

That would make the legendary rank mean something again.
-1 airdrop merit per activity period. Simple, brutal for shitposters, and god for copper membership sales Cheesy

.

Back to the trust requirement, although I wouldn't like to see such a requirement for the next rank level I also can't help asking my self, If you don't trade don't leave and receive feedback, why would you want a higher rank? This considering you have already earned 1000+ merits so you're already pretty well known and your opinion is respected even without a new badge.

But it's not going to happen anyway..

lobcmt2

full member

Activity: 462

Merit: 155

Quote from: hilariousetc on April 16, 2019, 06:50:08 AM

I dunno. I think this will just lead to people trying to farm their feedback to try achieve the rank. I think there should be a new level above Legendary though. There's a big difference now between a new user signing up and eventually achieving legendary and someone who signed up a few years ago and just got it by being here a while. Maybe the activity to get Legendary should be changed so it all has to be earned merit and not airdropped and anyone who doesn't have sufficient merit is demoted to Hero. There's not really any benefits to being a Legendary over Hero anyway other than in name so it won't matter much. That would then at least give the rank some meaning. There's far too many Legendaries about now and there's probably not gonna be many more made naturally so I think there should be some distinction between those who just go lucky.

For now, maybe old generation of Legendary have reason to keep their ranks, but if we look at 10 years later, it will be ridiculous if 10 years after merit system born, they won't earn a single merit and still be a Legendary.
Why only demoted to Hero?
I suggest to have auto-demotion over time.
For example:
4 years after merit system's birthday, if a Legendary won't earn enough 500 merits, account will be demoted to Hero.
6 years after, if a Legendary won't earn enough 250 merits, account will be demoted to Senior Member.
8 years later, a Legendary won't earn enough 100 merits, account will be demoted to Full Member.

NavI_027

full member

Activity: 1232

Merit: 186

Quote from: Mpamaegbu on April 16, 2019, 03:13:29 AM

I foresee a situation where the Trust score will begin to serve as the new requirement for members to rank up. Honestly, Theymos could be harbouring this thought. It's over a year now since the sMerit system was instituted and his silence so far in creating another level after the "Legendary" rank portends something, I should think. What do you guys think?

I don't think the same way and I really hope theymos didn't too. Merit system is doing fine, the shitposters and spammers as well as the good mediocre members (unfortunately) are perished already what more if your suggestion would be implemented? Yeah! The brighter side would be a total eradication of toxic members lurking but at the same time there's a high tendency that most of the members might stop growing (of course, not all of us are as good as the veterans here Grin

).

I'm not saying that it wasn't a good idea at all but for me it was not feasible. I will agree more if there will only be a new rank above Legendary.

hilariousetc

legendary

Activity: 2786

Merit: 3029

Join the world-leading crypto sportsbook NOW!

I dunno. I think this will just lead to people trying to farm their feedback to try achieve the rank. I think there should be a new level above Legendary though. There's a big difference now between a new user signing up and eventually achieving legendary and someone who signed up a few years ago and just got it by being here a while. Maybe the activity to get Legendary should be changed so it all has to be earned merit and not airdropped and anyone who doesn't have sufficient merit is demoted to Hero. There's not really any benefits to being a Legendary over Hero anyway other than in name so it won't matter much. That would then at least give the rank some meaning. There's far too many Legendaries about now and there's probably not gonna be many more made naturally so I think there should be some distinction between those who just go lucky.

I've spoke about a new rank before. Fixing Legendary to 960 merit or upping it drastically would still be a good idea:

Quote from: hilariousetc on August 15, 2018, 05:17:27 AM

Quote from: suchmoon on August 14, 2018, 10:07:11 PM

Holy crap... 2000+ activity should definitely be a new rank, Legendary just doesn't cut it. And 2000+ merits of course.

Or perhaps remove the rank name altogether at that level. Leave the newbies guessing who they're dealing with. Sort of like debadging a car.

There should be an addition rank made. It could supersede Legendary and Legendary is bumped up to a higher activity requirement. Legendary is becoming far too common now and will only become more so as time passes. I have suggested fixing Legendary at 960 activity and the new rank is double that at 1920. You could also make the merit requirement very high for this rank so it's only for the very highest contributors. 2000 merit would probably do as that would be very difficult to achieve and would only be likely done so by the very top percentile of contributors here.

Mpamaegbu

legendary

Activity: 2674

Merit: 1208

Once a man, twice a child!

Quote from: LoyceV on April 16, 2019, 06:22:04 AM

Seriously though: 2000+ Activity and Merit would be good for a new rank.

I guess apart from users Theymos and Satoshi, you will be the first to hit that new rank.

Your Merit pours...

darklus123

hero member

Activity: 1246

Merit: 588

I also don't think so and if so I woudn't agree with it. Being untrustworthy can't define how good you make quality post or being neutral doesn't you can't contribute good quality post.

Trust is on a different category and having a trust alone can already be a trademark. Plus this can be very subjective , you can't force anyone to trust you same as you do to them.

Plus currently I found trust system quite complicated in which not everyone can understand.

Edit: We can't simply relate two equal level of system. The ranking system was created having the same level of trust system. Therefore whatever would be your trust score will not affect your ranking system. Unlike merit system in which its main purpose why it was created is to become a requirement for the ranking system.

Plus all the trust dramas that you will see in which you can't really tell whos right. Where are you going to put QS for example on the ranking system if this becomes a requirement? Even tho this user has a lot of issues. We can somehow consider him/her atleast giving some good informations

ryap12

member

Activity: 700

Merit: 14

Quote from: samcrypto on April 16, 2019, 03:38:59 AM

That's actually a good idea, to create a new rank after the LEGENDARY, and the TRUST requirement should only be applicable to them.
So its just like the rankings on DOTA2.

Legendary
Ancient
Divine
Immortal

Well, this is just an example of ranking names but I know if ever Theymos can think for a better name of the rankings.

This is just to much and probably they will not spend too much time working on new ranks. I mean getting into legendary is already difficult for those who just signed-up. I know it is fun to think about it and it's going to be a challenge for those who ranked top already.

LoyceV

legendary

Activity: 3290

Merit: 16489

Thick-Skinned Gang Leader and Golden Feather 2021

Quote from: LFC_Bitcoin on April 16, 2019, 03:42:59 AM

I think there could possibly be a new rank, something like this -

Activity: 2000
Merit: 2000

Make it a hybrid: Merit + Activity > 4000: Legend. And yes, I choose this so that I qualify Tongue

Seriously though: 2000+ Activity and Merit would be good for a new rank.

lobcmt2

full member

Activity: 462

Merit: 155

Quote from: samcrypto on April 16, 2019, 03:38:59 AM

That's actually a good idea, to create a new rank after the LEGENDARY, and the TRUST requirement should only be applicable to them.
So its just like the rankings on DOTA2.

Legendary
Ancient
Divine
Immortal

Well, this is just an example of ranking names but I know if ever Theymos can think for a better name of the rankings.

It is too complicated, I don't think theymos has interests with it, and me too.
Over time, trust system and rank system are different and they also have difference roles in the forum ,since their beginnings. I don't see overlaps between them, and don't think the forum should adjust them to have such complex overlaps.
Personally, only one new rank above Legendary is enough. If more and more ranks added over time, the forum will turn into almost same with what we can see in games. Ranks and levels of games' characters added overtime, and years later become overload. But, they are games, and gaming companies need such overload to get income. The forum is totally different, so I don't think theymos will add many more ranks

If new ranks added, I suggested to add only one more rank, like Maharishi.
To get that rank, users have to collect 4000 merits in minimum. It will take even outstanding users 4 to 5 years to hit that rank. It also means that we only should think of a next new rank 10 years later.

logfiles

copper member

Activity: 1960

Merit: 1638

Top Crypto Casino

Quote from: Mpamaegbu on April 16, 2019, 03:13:29 AM

I foresee a situation where the Trust score will begin to serve as the new requirement for members to rank up.

I don't think it will ever happen.
Not all members here care about trust or do things that require trust such as trading.
Some of them just come to discuss about different topics or help other members. so what happens to them?

TMAN

legendary

Activity: 1414

Merit: 1808

Exchange Bitcoin quickly-https://blockchain.com.do

Quote from: Pmalek on April 16, 2019, 05:42:57 AM

Trust and knowledge of bitcoin and the ability to create quality posts are not correlated in any way.
You can know everything there is to know about bitcoin and have 3000 merits but that doesn't necessarily mean that you must have or will have positive trust.
Likewise, you can have negative trust but still be very knowledgeable on different topic and that is why trust and rank requirement (merits+activity) shouldn't be mixed.

QS is a prime example of this, the bloke knows his shit but his trust score is fucked. Him and I don’t get on but his level of knowledge is admirable.

Pmalek

legendary

Activity: 2730

Merit: 7065

Farewell, Leo. You will be missed!

Trust and knowledge of bitcoin and the ability to create quality posts are not correlated in any way.
You can know everything there is to know about bitcoin and have 3000 merits but that doesn't necessarily mean that you must have or will have positive trust.
Likewise, you can have negative trust but still be very knowledgeable on different topic and that is why trust and rank requirement (merits+activity) shouldn't be mixed.

El duderino_

legendary

Activity: 2492

Merit: 11937

BTC + Crossfit, living life.

Quote from: LFC_Bitcoin on April 16, 2019, 04:11:14 AM

Quote from: El duderino_ on April 16, 2019, 03:56:34 AM

Quote from: LFC_Bitcoin on April 16, 2019, 03:42:59 AM

I think there could possibly be a new rank, something like this -

Activity: 2000
Merit: 2000

I don’t think trust rating should have anything to do with it though.

Sssjjj LFC, activity 2000 Shocked

LOL!

Just because the Legendary Rank was somewhere between 750 or 780 & 1030. The Merit required to become Legendary 1000 so 2000 for both is double. That seems about right?

Dammit my activity is only 658 but then again i'm only here from 2017 so of-course your right, you are here a long time already talking BTC and everything around it, trying to provide people this healthy space to talk and speak free mind.... so 2000 and 2000 is very very legit.

But damn the Long way I need to go

"but I don't mind its just another HODL"

LFC_Bitcoin

legendary

Activity: 3528

Merit: 9525

#1 VIP Crypto Casino

Quote from: El duderino_ on April 16, 2019, 03:56:34 AM

Quote from: LFC_Bitcoin on April 16, 2019, 03:42:59 AM

I think there could possibly be a new rank, something like this -

Activity: 2000
Merit: 2000

I don’t think trust rating should have anything to do with it though.

Sssjjj LFC, activity 2000 Shocked

LOL!

Just because the Legendary Rank was somewhere between 750 or 780 & 1030. The Merit required to become Legendary 1000 so 2000 for both is double. That seems about right?

CryptopreneurBrainboss

legendary

Activity: 2240

Merit: 4133

eXch.cx - Automatic crypto Swap Exchange.

I was onces advocating for some challenges involving new rank after legendary status but after reading some reply and considering the time frame it takes even a quality posters to achieve that status I don't think Introducing a new rank will be fair for them (newly rank-up user). The merit system have stabilize everything only deserving members can now achieve that status.

Concerning OP's prediction, I don't think that'll even be considered as an option. The trust system is already filled with drama introducing it into the rank-up system will just make the case worst. We don't want another ~~merit~~ sorry trust broke my life trend.

erikalui

legendary

Activity: 2618

Merit: 1094

It can't be possible right now as unlike merits, we have to take into account negative trust feedback. If a user gets positive trust, he ranks up so if he gets negative trust, he'll rank down? That's really weird.

Topic: Trust: The New Rank requirement? (Read 443 times)