Topic: Tucker Interviews Putin - page 2. (Read 518 times)

Okay, think about this. We knew it all along, but we just didn't have any incentive to focus on it before.

If a guy from New York City talks to a guy from Abilene, Texas, they both understand each other, but it is difficult for them because the dialects of English are different. If you add a mountain man from the mountains in Tennessee, it becomes more difficult, still, because the Tennessee dialect is different than both of the others. Add a guy from the State of Georgia, and it becomes even more difficult. The languages of these people are all English. They are simply a different form of English... dialects.

Ukrainian is essentially a dialect of Russian. Even though there are several different languages spoken in Ukraine, the real Slavic language of Ukraine is simply a dialect of Russian. But you could say that Russian is a dialect of Ukrainian.

Something like 29% of Ukrainians (before the war) spoke Russian as their first language.

But that's not even the point. The point is that the Ukraine government was attacking their own people who spoke Russian... starting in and even before 2014. Putin simply protected these people when it became necessary.

The situation is different between China and Taiwan. China isn't trying to protect Taiwanese from a warmongering Taiwan government as Putin was protecting Ukrainians from a warmongering Ukraine government.


What NO ONE is saying about Tucker Carlson's Putin Interview

---

https://off-guardian.org/2024/02/10/what-no-one-is-saying-about-tucker-carlsons-putin-interview/
Everyone is talking about Tucker Carlson's interview with Russian President Vladimir Putin.

The two-hour long conversation was live-streamed on twitter. Every major news outlet has had some form of coverage.

You can watch the whole thing here:


After eight years of covering the Ukraine coup/civil War, and more specifically Western propaganda on Russia, I could pretty much tell you everything Putin was going to say before he said it.

Anybody who has covered Russia or Ukraine could tell you that.

He was always going to detail, in cogent and historically literate terms, Russia's position on Ukraine.

He was always going  to  cite  the (very real) broken promises Western diplomats made about NATO's Eastward expansion.
...

---

You seem to agree with Putin that Ukraine is properly party of Russia (thus justifying Russia's attack on Ukraine).

So would you agree with China as well with respect to Taiwan?

You are among those who I don't seem to agree with. You used the word 'too' in your question, but you didn't explain what you are referring to when using it.

I know. It would take more typing, and that would be work, right?

I must admit though, It was quite amusing when Tucker Carlson asked Puting if he knew who actually blew up the Nordstream gas pipeline back several months ago, as if Putin was willing to give such an privileged information to Tucker's public so easily, Puting even joked about the question itself before talking about it kind of seriously.
What did Tucker actually expect from that question? Did he expected to Putin to say who was the actual responsible of the sabotage of the gas pipeline based on their own intelligence work? I thought not. Giving away that information right now is not convenient for Russian interests in this war. On the other hand, I could realistically imagine Putin accusing Ukraine or the United States of it in the future, in order to create more division between Ukraine and Europe or between USA and Europe. I am sure Germany does not take that kind of sabotage on their infrastructure slightly, but seeing how Trump seems to be in a possible path to win the presidency of the United States again, Puting may not be in need to play that card on the table.
Let us see what happens, it was a multimillion dollar project, after all, are we supposed to wait for nobody to be punished for it?

Just out of curiosity, when China says that Taiwan is part of China--presumably justifying a forthcoming invasion of that country by them--do you agree with them too?

I don’t think you can believe much of what Putin say, much like with any political leader. The interview is fascinating though regardless. I don’t want to get into conspiracy theories but I have also long suspected that certain leaders are just a pawn in the game, a puppet with the strings controlled by others in the background. I can’t think of a more obvious time of this potentially happening than currently with Biden. The guy doesn’t have the cognitive levels required to run the most powerful country in the world. We’ll never know what is going on behind closed doors but I do think Putin speaks some truth there. Fascinating insight into the mind of Putin.

Ukraine's never been anything other than a battleground to attack Russia... ever. There isn't any stable Ukrainian history. Ukraine has always been bounced around like a ping-pong ball. And since it's mostly made up of Russians, it's Russians who are being hurt.

You get denser as time goes on.

Ruzzia has never been anyone's ally dumBAss. They play their own game and were very happy to receive weapons and supplies under the lend and lease during WWII, but Stalin an his successors have always had very clear in their minds that the capitalist US was the biggest threat to their future power because it shows how a different world is possible and better.

Putin is well know to lie - e.g. "I am not going to invade Ukraine" and even to the point of not recognising Ruzzia is at war.

Went right over your head, didn't it.

Of course, you weren't around when Russia was our ally in WW2. And you don't remember that it was the US and the US wealthy elite who financed the Bolshevik Revolution to topple Russia - even though it backfired. And you have been sucking down all the BS US propaganda that Russia is an enemy. And you forgot to remember how loads of US politicians over the years have wanted to get their hands on Russian lands... and said so.

And you like it when the US banking system creates loads of more money so that they become wealthy, and average Americans become poorer. You just enjoy it when the world sits by and watches Americans getting screwed by their own country and banking system, and nobody does anything about it.

Putin didn't say much of this directly. But he would have liked to wake the American people up. So, he is doing it through the formation of BRICS, a system that will bring down our enemy, the banking system. Even Trump might not understand it... the criminality of the US and EU banking systems.

https://duckduckgo.com/?t=ffab&q=Tom+Schauf%2C+bank+freedom&ia=web

Wake up and die right.

Oh, it wasn't very quiet. In fact it was the central theme of the interview.

Putin's objective for this interview is to signal to the 40% of Americans who already want to vote for Trump that he's on their side, and against the other side.

Trump is surely the first major presidential candidate in the history of the USA who will have benefitted from the endorsement of one of our country's primary enemies.

Strange times indeed...

The point is, now you have a source to see what Russia is all about. Some folks will say, "Lies, lies, lies. Putin lies." But if Putin is telling the truth, you at least now can have an understanding of it... if you are interested. Much of the history that Putin talked about in the first half hour is common knowledge, even though you have to dig for it a bit in libraries around the world.

One of the most important points quietly coming out of this interview is (read between the lines), Trump is right on. We are being played by the wealthy banker and bank owner cabal. The West banking system is thieving from us all.

The Transcript - https://redstatenation.com/read-it-here-the-transcripts-from-tucker-carlsons-exclusive-interview-with-president-vladimir-putin-in-moscow-are-released/

That's not what I am saying at all. Putin is that well educated teacher who knows so much, bombing you with information and it gets as boring as watching the demented fool's mumbling.

He said it in the first minutes of the interview though. "Is this going to be a show or the real thing?" That's when I understood he was gonna go "too" serious...

Trump is the king of entertainment in politics, once you watch him everyone else looks underwhelming.

Look at this:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TyrHqJdgU7w

That's AWESOME.

He's a trained KGB agent, he's not going to give the CIA anything new.

Please show me a similar interview with Biden or Boris from the UK so that I can watch with interest.

It may very well be propaganda (of course Putin is going to talk in Russia's interest), but it's also important to know his state of mind. Since he rarely gets interviews from the West, as least from my understanding, this one is important because now there is a conversation which people can draw conclusions from.

A little intelligence goes a long way. Which seems to be lacking worldwide unfortunately.

I thought that would be an interesting interview to watch but it was a 2 hour snoozefest. The interview sent me back to the high school history class where I was sleeping with my eyes open. I usually like to listen to Putin’s speeches because he usually says something interesting which you don’t hear in the mainstream media but this interview wasn’t like that except for a few minutes.

He is saying the same stuff which he has always been saying… “The NATO expands to our doorsteps and we don’t want to get surrounded by them…” it is not just that he doesn’t want it, he says there was an agreement on the subject and it was violated 5 times.

Another thing he says which I find fairly interesting is that the European countries have no free will or whatsoever and I agree with that statement somehow. Basically every NATO member is a bitch of the US and even though they don’t agree with the US on some topics at first, eventually they all agree because they don’t have the courage to go against the US politics. (or else) You can’t call them independent nations anymore.

Seems that history shows us that Putin's evaluation of Ukraine being a created State for the economic achievements of some group, is rather correct. What economic achievements? To steal land from Russia. The US even talks like this... stealing the lands from Russia.



Tucker's formal following isn't all that big. But big isn't what counts. What counts is who listens to Tucker, and why. However, it may have all been coincidence, right?

Do not give so much credit to Putin, though. Regardless whether politicians are from the west or the east, they will always have something in common, most of the have to resort to lies to keep their positions of power. Putin just happens to have learnt a lot of his time as an agent of the defunct Soviet Union, and what he learnt he is applying it in Russia as president to slowly brainwash the population of Russia to defend him and the ideas he represents. I have read on the internet Russia is the kind of country where homophobia is very implanted in society in general, to the extent people of the LGBT community have had to flee from there to other European countries as refugees.
It is not a coincidence much of the Kremlin propaganda want to white wash the prosecution against people based in their sexual preferences, their political standing and the brutality going on in Ukraine.


Do you have an actual explanation on what they could be happening or are we supposed to speculate on it? I believe you are overestimating the influence Tucker Carlson could actually have over the behavior of the price of Bitcoin, specially with an interview which does not focus on Bitcoin. This increase in the price is likely because other factors which do not have anything to do with Russia or Tucker Carlson at all.

All it took was the release of this interview to bump Bitcoin to well over $47,000, and even spike to over $48,000 for a moment or two.

If you have not heard the "other side of the story" AKA as Putin's bag of shit, is because you did not want to hear it. This is 2 hours of political propaganda and my only takeaway from it is that it is becoming more clear where the financing to MAGA friendly media comes from.

Is just braindead rhetoric for the weaklings of MAGA. "We are not your enemy", "we do not seek conflict"... it just collides head on with the last 20 years of Ruzzia's doing.


Nor by being honest.