- snip -
Why did the referee award a penalty when the Fenerbahce player didn't tackle the Sivasspor player and also the Fenerbahce goalkeeper didn't tackle the Sivasspor player?
Yes, the penalty was controversial, but after looking at replays and some screenshots from Google, there were actually two direct contacts.
And from the first picture it looks like it was a foul, there was a kick/push to the back knee of Sivasspor player no 9/Rey Manaj.
I don't like talking about referees because some situations are gray areas. It's impossible for us to interpret gray areas neutrally. I don't think I can ever be neutral because I am a Fenerbahçe supporter, but I do have a comment on this situation.
In the first photo, it appears that Dijiku made a move towards Manaj before Manaj took a shot on goal. If there was any interference with Manaj in this move, Manaj wouldn't have been able to take the shot and would have fallen before shooting.
In the second photo, Livakovic's move towards Manaj is visible, but this move was made after Manaj took the shot.
Fenerbahçe players may have disrupted Manaj's balance in both photos, but I don't believe these interventions prevented Manaj from taking the shot. The match referee used his discretion in favor of the penalty. I can't blame him for that. If Fenerbahçe had won a penalty in such a situation, I wouldn't have objected to it.