Topic: Twitter seems likely to integrate tipping using Bitcoin. (Read 337 times)

So here we go. The ball has started rolling. The tipping feature is now available on Twitter. For now, it could only be accessed by some iOS users. Android will follow in the coming weeks.

The feature is presumed to be compatible with Strike, Cash App, Muun, and other third-party Bitcoin payment solutions. Of course, Square's upcoming hardware wallet will also be supported by this feature.^[1]

With this new service offered, Twitter has somehow become a hybrid platform, serving both as a social networking site and as a remittance app. One could now freely and instantly send money to anybody on Twitter all over the world.

[1] https://bitcoinmagazine.com/culture/jack-dorsey-twitter-rolls-out-bitcoin-lightning-tips-for-ios-users

As long as they do not make it difficult for people to withdraw a few satoshis or dollars every now and then,,, then it is fine. But imagine if you allowed 10 satoshi tipping or okay 20 satoshi (over US 1 cent now) and then discover you need min 30,000 satoshi to withdraw, plus fee.

I can foresee a lot of abandoned accounts making money for Twitter.

Assuming that they are only going to allow you display Lightning invoices. I'd be very surprised if there was no option to display a standard Bitcoin address, especially if the information about allowing users to display Ethereum addresses is accurate.

I never even thought of that. How often will the average Twitter user visit their own profile to double check the address/invoice hasn't been changed. Even worse considering a hacker could have days to generate a look-alike address using a vanity generator so it is not immediately obvious.

I agree. If you are careless enough to believe a fake Elon Musk Twitter profile will send back double whatever you send to the address they post, then you are also careless enough to follow a link saying the same thing.

PayPal, etc transactions are reversible, so if a twitter account hack results in someone sending payments to one of these types of accounts, the payments can be reversed. This is not true for bitcoin nor LN payments.

Like I mentioned, twitter reduced the future potential benefit to a similar hack as what took place in 2020 by preventing users from being able to post bitcoin addresses.

Yeah, he is not connected with Twitter. He's just a self-proclaimed leaker. But it seems he's got access to some beta versions. Perhaps he was one of those who also made tests on certain versions. It seems he's also gathering screenshots from those who had the opportunity to made the test themselves.


https://twitter.com/alex193a/status/1433537509523214337

Even Twitter's product lead developer, Kayvon Beykpour, confirmed the truth of one of his tweets.^[1]


Well, it seems the direction is toward integrating Bitcoin to the social media platform. There are always risks, of course. But a hack is a hack and even if there is no Bitcoin address on the profile, just like when the 2020 hack happened, the risk is still existent and damage could still be done. Even the current Tip Jar feature is risky enough if a hack occurs. The hacker could also change the user's PayPal, Cash App, Venmo, and other addresses.

[1] https://twitter.com/kayvz/status/1433115154028187650

This person does not appear to be associated with Twitter, beyond having a Twitter account. I am not sure why news outlets are citing this person. Most likely, this person was speculating as to what using bitcoin via twitter would look like.

I would also find it very unlikely that Twitter will encourage using bitcoin on its platform. Doing so would create a lot of risks, one of which being that it gives people direct financial incentives to hack Twitter accounts. After Twitter was hacked last year, they prevented (verified?) users from posting bitcoin addresses in their tweets.

Twitter is far from a "non-evil" company for many reasons. They allow terrorists who want to commit mass murder to publish propaganda to get more people to join them, while they censor people they disagree with.

If people are displaying LN invoices as a means to receive payment, there should not be a major de-anonymization issue, as it is not trivial to get a lot of information about transaction history from a LN invoice, and is even more difficult if you are not actively monitoring a channel.

It has the potential to be even worse than what you describe. Accounts can get hijacked, and new addresses/invoices can be changed in a profile without someone creating even a single fraudulent tweet.

Sorry, am I missing something here? You need to use Strike, which requires KYC, and connect that to your Twitter profile to display a Lightning invoice for other users to send tips to. And what exactly is stopping me just using a non-custodial non-KYC wallet and generating my own Lightning invoice and putting that on my Twitter profile, bypassing their system and their KYC altogether?

This seems like a privacy nightmare. Potentially millions of people are about to de-anonymize themselves by linking their very public names and social media accounts to their bitcoin wallets. Also, the amount of Twitter scams I can see coming is going to be ridiculous. Now fake Elon Musk accounts can just ask people to send donations directly to the bitcoin address listed on their profile.

Strike only requires the receiver to be KYC'd but anybody can send them BTC from any wallet that supports Lightning Network. I don't know why it would be necessary for the sender to go through KYC. I don't want to have to be asked for ID when supporting a charity or even for personal transactions where I send money to friends. Bitcoin is designed to be permissionless so if they add all these requirements then it would be a huge disappointment and it will keep many people excluded from their payment platform.

Twitter being among one of the preferred platforms by most  influencers this should be a good way to showcase some of bitcoins strengths such as being able to send micro payments (tips) a thing not so popular with fiat and also remove the burden of user verification another stressful process about fiat systems. Honestly this is a win win for bitcoin and crypto just hope if btc is used fees don't jump high like it's counter part Ethereum.

Regardless if a certain company/platform is "trusted" or not, it's still a great move to decrease the usage of AML/KYC as much as possible. Twitter could be the best non-evil company in the world, but if their database gets breached, good luck erasing your personal information from the web.

Well maybe yes they will implement that since knowing we are dealing money for using twitter but we shouldn't get afraid for that requirements if they require their user to do that since Twitter is a strong platform which is now registered to the government. For sure they think about legalities for implementing that so there's no really big thing to afraid regarding unto this since for sure the one we see is great thing addition usage of bitcoin if twitter would really add up that feature.

Maybe, or maybe not. What's good is that people have the option to do so if they want to. And not only that, the fact that Twitter users can use bitcoin itself is good news, as it sorts of gives more "legitimacy" to bitcoin as an asset to those who still think in 2021 that bitcoin is a scam.

They would surely be cleaning their hands from the start and if its needed to imply KYC then it is something not surprising. Just like what others been saying then this is something not that interesting nor
giving out some positive effect.

In regards with exposure then it would somehow give that awareness specially to those people who havent able to meet or aware about bitcoins existence specially if they do saw that it can
be used in tipping when its already integrated and we know that when curiosity strikes then people would search or dig deeper about it.

It's very positive news but at the same time the trouble that user has to go through doesn't worth and in this case I mean, you have to create account, get KYC verified, deposit bitcoins and then fund others. Will people really do that just for twitter? Maybe yes if Strike will partner with Google, Apple, Facebook and other companies that will share the same provider for tips.

Idk, since they are going to do that, there would be a lot of research behind this and most likely they expect that this service will work and it will benefit their business well.

Using Strike should be only temporary during testing phase, and I think their service is only available in United States and El Salvador (sorry rest of the world).
They mention using Blue Wallet, Wallet of Satoshi as LN custodial wallets and Breez, Muun, Phoenix and Zap as non-custodial wallets, so there are plans to add other options for tips maybe even upcoming Square hardware.
Jack is now like octopus working on everything related with Bitcoin and he also plans to use BTC for Twitter Super Follows and subscriptions.
I wouldn't pass any KYC for this but if you do you can order Strike card and earn some cashback for purchasing stuff.

That for now may mean anything. As I wrote yesterday too on a similar topic , while strike is custodial, the news is not that great, not yet, not "for now".

Twitter will be hit by its government if there's an issue with its compliance towards KYC/AML. In all exchanges that are catering their users in the US, they're requiring KYC and that's why many have been having issues about it.

But we'll see how Twitter will implement such thing and if there's a concern about KYC. Because I'm sure that they're going to be compliant with the governments rule about it as there's still 'money' involve.

"I fought the law and the law won." Well, perhaps Jack's a fan of The Clash and has learned a precious lesson from them.



Same here. Agreed. This might still be net positive to me as well. This is still more like a step forward rather than a step backward. Although I must say there has to be even just a mild resistance. Wouldn't you think? Or are we just to nod, yield, say yes, and avoid displeasing them all the way?

Of course, it is easier said than done. It is easy to say this because I don't own Twitter. However, when are we to stop walking on eggshells and start pushing for a little privacy? After all, this is just about a social media platform and small amounts of tips in Bitcoin. Surely, the fears upon which KYC in line with AML and CFT policies are founded could hardly be applicable here.