running GUIminer, getting 289 mhash/s I have four of these running
Topic: Two 5830 @ 280Mhash/s, can I get more out of it? - page 2. (Read 3675 times)
975/300 (-v -w128 -f0) f0 really makes a 1% diff i think (not sure tho)
running GUIminer, getting 289 mhash/s I have four of these running
running GUIminer, getting 289 mhash/s I have four of these running
yeah just finally switched to phoenix + phatk and now getting 307 out of my 5830 @ 990/330.
with identical flags as before
poclbm - 295
phatk - 307
with identical flags as before
poclbm - 295
phatk - 307
You might get more out of a linux install running hashkill or phoenix. The difference is fairly negligible at this point though.
add "worksize=256" and maybe try "phatk" kernel
Getting 295 out of my sapphire 5830 @ 981/327 on Slush using poclbm 4/28
-v VECTORS BFI_INT FASTLOOP=false AGGRESSION=12 WORKSIZE=256
-v VECTORS BFI_INT FASTLOOP=false AGGRESSION=12 WORKSIZE=256
I get 280Mh/s on my 5830 using only a 970 Mhz OC
poclbm with flags -v -w 128
I hear you're supposed to get more with Phoenix, so maybe you're doing something wrong.
Also, you could try mining in Linux, I hear that helps.
poclbm with flags -v -w 128
I hear you're supposed to get more with Phoenix, so maybe you're doing something wrong.
Also, you could try mining in Linux, I hear that helps.
I just got my XFX 5830 last night and got it in my rig. I underclocked the ram down to 500Mhz and overclocked the GPU from 800Mhz to 980Mhz. I was getting about 290 using GUIMiner with the flags -v -w 256 but I had some odd problems staying connected to BTCGuild while using it. I decided to try the phoenix miner for the first time.
My current settings with phoenix miner are the following:
-k poclbm DEVICE=0 VECTORS BFI_INT FASTLOOP=false AGGRESSION=11
Are there any additional or different settings I can play with to get past 280Mhash/s?
My current settings with phoenix miner are the following:
-k poclbm DEVICE=0 VECTORS BFI_INT FASTLOOP=false AGGRESSION=11
Are there any additional or different settings I can play with to get past 280Mhash/s?
Jump to: