They wont show thier dev. They wont tell any1 when they will ship.
Haw You did it??
Topic: Ufasoft Miner - Windows/Linux, x86/x64, SSE2/OpenCL, Open Source - page 23. (Read 631117 times)
January 08, 2012, 03:15:43 AM
Haw You did it: "Support of BitForce devices" ??
They wont show thier dev. They wont tell any1 when they will ship.
Haw You did it??
They wont show thier dev. They wont tell any1 when they will ship.
Haw You did it??
January 07, 2012, 08:23:36 PM
successfully built, enjoy 
http://darkgamex.ch/ufasoft/
EDIT: ive edited my signature so i dont have to post the link always
http://darkgamex.ch/ufasoft/
EDIT: ive edited my signature so i dont have to post the link always
January 07, 2012, 08:19:07 PM
pooler-minerd is marginally faster on all of my I7 and Core2 platforms ........for me anyways. Unfortunately, I don't have any AMD CPUs to test with.
January 07, 2012, 06:49:28 PM
atm it cant be built with gcc4.4 (stable) so im waiting until ufasoft fixes this (im in contact with him), if he fixed it il release the 0.24
fixed for GCC 4.4. Thank you!
your welcome
EDIT: building + packaging = done.
January 07, 2012, 12:10:18 PM
atm it cant be built with gcc4.4 (stable) so im waiting until ufasoft fixes this (im in contact with him), if he fixed it il release the 0.24
fixed for GCC 4.4. Thank you!
January 07, 2012, 09:30:46 AM
atm it cant be built with gcc4.4 (stable) so im waiting until ufasoft fixes this (im in contact with him), if he fixed it il release the 0.24 portable build you can find them here: http://darkgamex.ch/ufasoft/
i think ufasoft should link that to the first page because compiling it on linux, if you dont know the dependencys, is horror and the x86 AMD SDK package is buged (x86 package got x64 libs? retarded amd/ati...).
even when you got the AMD SDK package installed youl have to copy over libs to the builddir and another thing (cant remember it, was trial and error) until it works, this due to a failure in the AMD libs (libatical*).
if i build the 0.24 successfully with gcc4.4 (atm you need 4.5, so every person would have to install additional libs so this isnt nice for a portable build!) and the mining works (may take a time, i only got a CPU to test on) then il release the 0.24 portable build. i will write a post when this is done
PS: excuse my spelling, im in a hurry
you can find them here: http://darkgamex.ch/ufasoft/i think ufasoft should link that to the first page because compiling it on linux, if you dont know the dependencys, is horror and the x86 AMD SDK package is buged (x86 package got x64 libs? retarded amd/ati...).
even when you got the AMD SDK package installed youl have to copy over libs to the builddir and another thing (cant remember it, was trial and error) until it works, this due to a failure in the AMD libs (libatical*).
if i build the 0.24 successfully with gcc4.4 (atm you need 4.5, so every person would have to install additional libs so this isnt nice for a portable build!) and the mining works (may take a time, i only got a CPU to test on) then il release the 0.24 portable build. i will write a post when this is done
PS: excuse my spelling, im in a hurry
January 07, 2012, 07:43:45 AM
alright.
I attemted to compile the source, but failed in the configuration step, some of the packages in my centos6 box are too old, and I'm afraid upgrading manually may corrupt something....
I attemted to compile the source, but failed in the configuration step, some of the packages in my centos6 box are too old, and I'm afraid upgrading manually may corrupt something....
January 07, 2012, 07:29:23 AM
Is your pooler's cpuminer built for x64?
My implementation uses only 8 SSE registers available on x86.
x64 has 16 SSE registers. May be that is the reason of performance difference.
yes! pooler's miner is built for x64,
when I use 4 thread, the hashrates are simillar.
btw, did you make a "x64 builds for Linux" in 0.24?
I didn't find the binary executable in the lzma package.
before some ppl made buils of 0.20 and 0.21 and nothing more, atm now im making portable builds but havent done the 0.24 yet, will do this now
January 07, 2012, 06:45:35 AM
btw, did you make a "x64 builds for Linux" in 0.24?
I didn't find the binary executable in the lzma package.
I didn't find the binary executable in the lzma package.
You can build source code to x64 linux, but anyway it uses only 8 SSE registers currently. So it will not increase performance.
Just wait v0.25 for x64 improvements...
January 07, 2012, 04:33:41 AM
Is your pooler's cpuminer built for x64?
My implementation uses only 8 SSE registers available on x86.
x64 has 16 SSE registers. May be that is the reason of performance difference.
yes! pooler's miner is built for x64,
when I use 4 thread, the hashrates are simillar.
btw, did you make a "x64 builds for Linux" in 0.24?
I didn't find the binary executable in the lzma package.
January 07, 2012, 04:16:46 AM
old version of pooler's cpuminer was optimized for intel cpu only, but the recent version is also optimized for AMD cpu.
on my [email protected](a dell-M6500 notebook),8 thread
Is your pooler's cpuminer built for x64?on my [email protected](a dell-M6500 notebook),8 thread
My implementation uses only 8 SSE registers available on x86.
x64 has 16 SSE registers. May be that is the reason of performance difference.
January 07, 2012, 02:35:31 AM
old version of pooler's cpuminer was optimized for intel cpu only, but the recent version is also optimized for AMD cpu.
on my [email protected](a dell-M6500 notebook),8 thread
pooler's miner is around 24kh,
while ufaminer is about 0.016mh
0.016mh are the same as 16kh on my [email protected](a dell-M6500 notebook),8 thread
pooler's miner is around 24kh,
while ufaminer is about 0.016mh
January 07, 2012, 02:22:25 AM
old version of pooler's cpuminer was optimized for intel cpu only, but the recent version is also optimized for AMD cpu.
on my [email protected](a dell-M6500 notebook),8 thread
pooler's miner is around 24kh,
while ufaminer is about 0.016mh
on my [email protected](a dell-M6500 notebook),8 thread
pooler's miner is around 24kh,
while ufaminer is about 0.016mh
January 06, 2012, 10:13:53 PM
it seems to be slower than minerd, anyone confirm? 6khash compared to 10 khash (minerd)
Please tell me what CPU/number of threads?I think pooler-cpuminer is optimized for AMD.
On Intel Core 2 results are more similar.
January 06, 2012, 09:20:48 PM
0.24 released
ADDED:
LiteCoin/TeneBrix CPU mining (option -a scrypt)
it seems to be slower than minerd, anyone confirm? 6khash compared to 10 khash (minerd) ADDED:
LiteCoin/TeneBrix CPU mining (option -a scrypt)
January 06, 2012, 08:38:02 PM
litecoin with your miner? i guess this is now the fastest miner for litecoin ^^
il make the binary builds later, im to busy atm sry
il make the binary builds later, im to busy atm sry
January 06, 2012, 08:09:56 PM
Sweet, thanks!
January 05, 2012, 08:37:23 PM
0.24 released
ADDED:
LiteCoin/TeneBrix CPU mining (option -a scrypt)
ADDED:
LiteCoin/TeneBrix CPU mining (option -a scrypt)
December 29, 2011, 07:11:09 AM
Quote
Mining solo works just fine with these arguements with no quotes
Fixed
Great! works fine!Fixed
Code:
start bitcoin-miner -t 4 -v -g no -u xxx -p xxx -o http://127.0.0.1:8332
Thanks!
December 26, 2011, 09:46:19 PM
i made the packages
miner now fully working if no crashes occurs then its the new stable
miner now fully working
if no crashes occurs then its the new stable Jump to: