They are being combined. Your links even show that. Not sure exactly what you are seeing.
(dozens of tiny inputs) -> 1HMERtWN7Y34irfnYEzdWgxNf8g89LP2vA 0.0054321 BTC
You now have a single unspent output worth 0.0054321 BTC @ 1HMERtWN7Y34irfnYEzdWgxNf8g89LP2vA
Topic: Uh, support for combining balances? - page 2. (Read 2135 times)
Thought I'd add that I was under the assumption that 'sendmany' would combine these 0.0000001's into a single balance on the '1HMER' address.
Knowing it doesn't work that way, for what reason would you pay double fees to use 'sendmany'?
(oh, and why would it send these balances of 0.000001 when the HMER account had received a deposit that would have covered the transferred amount one hundred fold three transactions earlier?)
Knowing it doesn't work that way, for what reason would you pay double fees to use 'sendmany'?
(oh, and why would it send these balances of 0.000001 when the HMER account had received a deposit that would have covered the transferred amount one hundred fold three transactions earlier?)
So stuff like this doesn't occur:
https://blockchain.info/tx-index/15918620/e3ac2968a25312d693e4946f713bd3ad7bf7792f62c9e5d9dc1b6da8522fc779
Why weren't all the 0.00000001 payments to 1HMERtWN7Y34irfnYEzdWgxNf8g89LP2vA consolidated into a single amt? What is the purpose of sendmany?
part 2:
https://blockchain.info/tx-index/15919627/2df34a1b002cb7be1e3787b36aa834b53abb591f83a8a5f4dbea0b6b985c2309
https://blockchain.info/tx-index/15918620/e3ac2968a25312d693e4946f713bd3ad7bf7792f62c9e5d9dc1b6da8522fc779
Why weren't all the 0.00000001 payments to 1HMERtWN7Y34irfnYEzdWgxNf8g89LP2vA consolidated into a single amt? What is the purpose of sendmany?
part 2:
https://blockchain.info/tx-index/15919627/2df34a1b002cb7be1e3787b36aa834b53abb591f83a8a5f4dbea0b6b985c2309
Jump to: