I mined 18.87% of the chain that won. I stopped mining, because I believed my point had been proven. There were three fights for control of the chain. I won 3, and lost 2, I believe.
Well, I was hoping to try to clarify what EXACTLY the definition of a successful attack is, with the developer. But, he was not interested in facts, just hand waving 'pay no attention to the man behind the curtain' when I tried to nail stuff down. See logs pasted earlier.
So, I got to define what a successful attack was. No-one's laughed at me, apart from the unat co-scammers, so I think that's pretty much a success.
OH. MY. FUCKING. GOD This is EXACTLY MY POINT. Are you NOT PAYING ATTENTION? SERIOUSLY?
I controlled the chain, with 18.7% of the blocks found.
Well, that at least we are in agreement on.
No. Now that's an out and out lie. I wrote it. 100%. Myself. I quoted two things, which I highlited, indented, and cited. This has been accused of me several times, without proof. And I know that it's not provable because I wrote it myself.
I'm skipping bits here, because you're ranting off about things that aren't really relevant.
Oh, really? I'd love for you to prove that - link to an orphaned block in the block explorer.
Here, here's a little place for you to link to it:
I'm skipping a pile of other stuff, because it's all dependent on this fallacy. Feel free to prove yourself right, and I'll address them all, but, as I know you can't, the rest of it is rubbish.
('He' is referring to the Dev in this context)
No. I asked the dev, specifically, if he will increase the block time, if I proved it was insecure. He refused to answer that. He vaguely answered that he will fix 'problems'. He has, however, been adamant that he will never change the block time. That's why I wanted him to answer that.
What pisses me off is this:
Is there any other reason you can provide for continuing to hype a provably broken coin?
Let's take a step back. If we take your view that my attack (which was attack 2) didn't work, and is infeasible, then the coin is still broken for many other reasons. (Attack 1, Attack 3, Difficulty heterodyne, and Oracle are the four that jump immediately to mind).
If I were the dev, I'd think about a legal action against Rob Thomas now.
Yep. That's what I'm saying. Here, let me clarify: I believe the dev of Unattainium is planning to steal coins, money, or other valuables, from people.
Is that clear enough for you? Would you like me to write it down and take a photo of me holding it? I'm quite happy to stand up and be visible. I don't skulk around in the shadows and steal from people.
Well. If you look like shit, smell like shit, and act like shit, you're going to have to expect people to assume you are shit. And so far, the coin and the dev has proven itself to be exactly that.